* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property @ 2015-11-30 17:00 Lucas Stach 2015-11-30 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI Lucas Stach 2015-12-02 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2015-11-30 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This has been moved to the reg property where it belongs for quite some time. The range has been unused by the kernel since then and with kernel 4.4 it's flagged as an unparsable range, as it does not comply to the PCI ranges DT binding. Fix this by removing the superfluous range. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index 2b6cc8bf3c5c..a5a731519d9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ #address-cells = <3>; #size-cells = <2>; device_type = "pci"; - ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x01f00000 0x01f00000 0 0x00080000 /* configuration space */ - 0x81000000 0 0 0x01f80000 0 0x00010000 /* downstream I/O */ + ranges = <0x81000000 0 0 0x01f80000 0 0x00010000 /* downstream I/O */ 0x82000000 0 0x01000000 0x01000000 0 0x00f00000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */ num-lanes = <1>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 120 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; -- 2.6.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2015-11-30 17:00 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Lucas Stach @ 2015-11-30 17:00 ` Lucas Stach 2015-12-02 8:03 ` Shawn Guo 2016-04-14 15:13 ` Tim Harvey 2015-12-02 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2015-11-30 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> --- arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y CONFIG_PCI=y +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y -- 2.6.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2015-11-30 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI Lucas Stach @ 2015-12-02 8:03 ` Shawn Guo 2016-04-14 15:13 ` Tim Harvey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2015-12-02 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:00:11PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Applied, thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2015-11-30 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI Lucas Stach 2015-12-02 8:03 ` Shawn Guo @ 2016-04-14 15:13 ` Tim Harvey 2016-04-15 8:21 ` Lucas Stach 1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2016-04-14 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > --- > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y > CONFIG_PCI=y > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y > CONFIG_SMP=y > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y > -- > 2.6.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel Lucas, Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on IMX6. I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? Regards, Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2016-04-14 15:13 ` Tim Harvey @ 2016-04-15 8:21 ` Lucas Stach 2017-03-30 23:42 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2016-04-15 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no > > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared > > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y > > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y > > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y > > CONFIG_PCI=y > > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y > > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y > > CONFIG_SMP=y > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y > > -- > > 2.6.2 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > Lucas, > > Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? > > Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling > MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on > IMX6. > > I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers > that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never > fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the > IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? > No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this only applies to the EP part of the core. We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI support until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types work when only one EP is connected. I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use them. Regards, Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2016-04-15 8:21 ` Lucas Stach @ 2017-03-30 23:42 ` Tim Harvey 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2017-03-30 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no >> > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared >> > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >> > --- >> > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >> > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y >> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y >> > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y >> > CONFIG_PCI=y >> > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y >> > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y >> > CONFIG_SMP=y >> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y >> > -- >> > 2.6.2 >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >> >> Lucas, >> >> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? >> >> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling >> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on >> IMX6. >> >> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers >> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never >> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the >> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? >> > No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states > that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this > only applies to the EP part of the core. > > We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI support > until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types > work when only one EP is connected. > I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where > some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use > them. > > Regards, > Lucas > Lucas, I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default it to disabled for compatibility. Regards, Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-03-30 23:42 ` Tim Harvey @ 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2017-03-31 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joao Pinto, Jingoo Han Cc: linux-pci, patchwork-lst, Krzysztof Hałasa, Sascha Hauer, Shawn Guo, linux-arm-kernel, Lucas Stach On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no >>> > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared >>> > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >>> > --- >>> > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + >>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> > >>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 >>> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y >>> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y >>> > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y >>> > CONFIG_PCI=y >>> > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y >>> > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y >>> > CONFIG_SMP=y >>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y >>> > -- >>> > 2.6.2 >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list >>> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >>> >>> Lucas, >>> >>> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? >>> >>> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling >>> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on >>> IMX6. >>> >>> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers >>> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never >>> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the >>> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? >>> >> No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states >> that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this >> only applies to the EP part of the core. >> >> We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI support >> until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types >> work when only one EP is connected. >> I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where >> some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use >> them. >> >> Regards, >> Lucas >> > > Lucas, > > I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > > To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > > Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > it to disabled for compatibility. > Joao / Jingoo, (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe core drivers) Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). Regards, Tim _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2017-03-31 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no >>> > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared >>> > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >>> > --- >>> > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + >>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> > >>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 >>> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y >>> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y >>> > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y >>> > CONFIG_PCI=y >>> > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y >>> > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y >>> > CONFIG_SMP=y >>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y >>> > -- >>> > 2.6.2 >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list >>> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >>> >>> Lucas, >>> >>> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? >>> >>> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling >>> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on >>> IMX6. >>> >>> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers >>> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never >>> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the >>> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? >>> >> No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states >> that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this >> only applies to the EP part of the core. >> >> We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI support >> until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types >> work when only one EP is connected. >> I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where >> some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use >> them. >> >> Regards, >> Lucas >> > > Lucas, > > I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > > To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > > Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > it to disabled for compatibility. > Joao / Jingoo, (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe core drivers) Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). Regards, Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey @ 2017-04-04 20:54 ` Jingoo Han -1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Jingoo Han @ 2017-04-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Tim Harvey', 'Joao Pinto' Cc: linux-pci, patchwork-lst, 'Krzysztof Hałasa', 'Sascha Hauer', 'Shawn Guo', linux-arm-kernel, 'Lucas Stach' On Friday, March 31, 2017 12:05 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: > >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > wrote: > >>> > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no > >>> > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared > >>> > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > >>> > --- > >>> > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > >>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > > >>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 > >>> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y > >>> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y > >>> > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y > >>> > CONFIG_PCI=y > >>> > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y > >>> > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y > >>> > CONFIG_SMP=y > >>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y > >>> > -- > >>> > 2.6.2 > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > >>> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > >>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > >>> > >>> Lucas, > >>> > >>> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? > >>> > >>> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling > >>> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on > >>> IMX6. > >>> > >>> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers > >>> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never > >>> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the > >>> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? > >>> > >> No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states > >> that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this > >> only applies to the EP part of the core. > >> > >> We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI > support > >> until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types > >> work when only one EP is connected. > >> I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where > >> some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use > >> them. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lucas > >> > > > > Lucas, > > > > I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > > drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > > wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > > driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > > mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > > many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > > limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > > > > To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > > it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > > > > Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > > controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > > If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > > it to disabled for compatibility. > > > > Joao / Jingoo, > > (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > core drivers) > > Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy and another controller can be used for MSI. But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device and legacy interrupt device at the same time. To Joao Pinto, Will you confirm this? Or if there is anyone who knows this well, please share your knowledge. :-) Thanks. Best regards, Jingoo Han > > Regards, > > Tim _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-04-04 20:54 ` Jingoo Han 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Jingoo Han @ 2017-04-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Friday, March 31, 2017 12:05 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: > >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > wrote: > >>> > This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no > >>> > reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared > >>> > IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > >>> > --- > >>> > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > >>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > > >>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 > >>> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > >>> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y > >>> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y > >>> > CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y > >>> > CONFIG_PCI=y > >>> > +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y > >>> > CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y > >>> > CONFIG_SMP=y > >>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y > >>> > -- > >>> > 2.6.2 > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > >>> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > >>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > >>> > >>> Lucas, > >>> > >>> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? > >>> > >>> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling > >>> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on > >>> IMX6. > >>> > >>> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers > >>> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never > >>> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the > >>> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? > >>> > >> No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states > >> that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this > >> only applies to the EP part of the core. > >> > >> We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI > support > >> until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types > >> work when only one EP is connected. > >> I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where > >> some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use > >> them. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Lucas > >> > > > > Lucas, > > > > I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > > drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > > wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > > driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > > mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > > many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > > limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > > > > To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > > it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > > > > Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > > controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > > If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > > it to disabled for compatibility. > > > > Joao / Jingoo, > > (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > core drivers) > > Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy and another controller can be used for MSI. But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device and legacy interrupt device at the same time. To Joao Pinto, Will you confirm this? Or if there is anyone who knows this well, please share your knowledge. :-) Thanks. Best regards, Jingoo Han > > Regards, > > Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-04-04 20:54 ` Jingoo Han @ 2017-04-05 12:07 ` Joao Pinto -1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-04-05 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jingoo Han, 'Tim Harvey', 'Joao Pinto' Cc: linux-pci, patchwork-lst, 'Krzysztof Hałasa', 'Sascha Hauer', 'Shawn Guo', linux-arm-kernel, 'Lucas Stach' w4BzIDk6NTQgUE0gZGUgNC80LzIwMTcsIEppbmdvbyBIYW4gZXNjcmV2ZXU6Cj4gT24gRnJpZGF5 LCBNYXJjaCAzMSwgMjAxNyAxMjowNSBQTSwgVGltIEhhcnZleSB3cm90ZToKPj4gT24gVGh1LCBN YXIgMzAsIDIwMTcgYXQgNDo0MiBQTSwgVGltIEhhcnZleSA8dGhhcnZleUBnYXRld29ya3MuY29t PiB3cm90ZToKPj4+IE9uIEZyaSwgQXByIDE1LCAyMDE2IGF0IDE6MjEgQU0sIEx1Y2FzIFN0YWNo IDxsLnN0YWNoQHBlbmd1dHJvbml4LmRlPgo+PiB3cm90ZToKPj4+PiBBbSBEb25uZXJzdGFnLCBk ZW4gMTQuMDQuMjAxNiwgMDg6MTMgLTA3MDAgc2NocmllYiBUaW0gSGFydmV5Ogo+Pj4+PiBPbiBN b24sIE5vdiAzMCwgMjAxNSBhdCA5OjAwIEFNLCBMdWNhcyBTdGFjaCA8bC5zdGFjaEBwZW5ndXRy b25peC5kZT4KPj4gd3JvdGU6Cj4+Pj4+PiBUaGlzIGhhcyBiZWVuIHN0YWJsZSBvbiBpLk1YNiBm b3IgYSBnb29kIHdoaWxlIG5vdyBhbmQgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8KPj4+Pj4+IHJlYXNvbiB0byBrZWVw IGl0IGRpc2FibGVkLCBhcyBpdCBhbGxvd3MgdG8gYWxsb2NhdGUgbm9uLXNoYXJlZAo+Pj4+Pj4g SVJRcyBpZiBzZXZlcmFsIFBDSWUgZGV2aWNlcyBhcmUgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRvIGEgc2luZ2xlIGhv c3QuCj4+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+Pj4gU2lnbmVkLW9mZi1ieTogTHVjYXMgU3RhY2ggPGwuc3RhY2hAcGVu Z3V0cm9uaXguZGU+Cj4+Pj4+PiAtLS0KPj4+Pj4+ICBhcmNoL2FybS9jb25maWdzL2lteF92Nl92 N19kZWZjb25maWcgfCAxICsKPj4+Pj4+ICAxIGZpbGUgY2hhbmdlZCwgMSBpbnNlcnRpb24oKykK Pj4+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4+PiBkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvYXJjaC9hcm0vY29uZmlncy9pbXhfdjZfdjdfZGVm Y29uZmlnCj4+IGIvYXJjaC9hcm0vY29uZmlncy9pbXhfdjZfdjdfZGVmY29uZmlnCj4+Pj4+PiBp bmRleCA0MTg3ZjY5ZjY2MzAuLmUyY2U2MGQwMGU4YSAxMDA2NDQKPj4+Pj4+IC0tLSBhL2FyY2gv YXJtL2NvbmZpZ3MvaW14X3Y2X3Y3X2RlZmNvbmZpZwo+Pj4+Pj4gKysrIGIvYXJjaC9hcm0vY29u Zmlncy9pbXhfdjZfdjdfZGVmY29uZmlnCj4+Pj4+PiBAQCAtNDUsNiArNDUsNyBAQCBDT05GSUdf U09DX0lNWDdEPXkKPj4+Pj4+ICBDT05GSUdfU09DX0xTMTAyMUE9eQo+Pj4+Pj4gIENPTkZJR19T T0NfVkY2MTA9eQo+Pj4+Pj4gIENPTkZJR19QQ0k9eQo+Pj4+Pj4gK0NPTkZJR19QQ0lfTVNJPXkK Pj4+Pj4+ICBDT05GSUdfUENJX0lNWDY9eQo+Pj4+Pj4gIENPTkZJR19TTVA9eQo+Pj4+Pj4gIENP TkZJR19QUkVFTVBUX1ZPTFVOVEFSWT15Cj4+Pj4+PiAtLQo+Pj4+Pj4gMi42LjIKPj4+Pj4+Cj4+ Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+Pj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X18KPj4+Pj4+IGxpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJuZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4+Pj4+PiBsaW51eC1hcm0t a2VybmVsQGxpc3RzLmluZnJhZGVhZC5vcmcKPj4+Pj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vdXJsZGVmZW5zZS5wcm9v ZnBvaW50LmNvbS92Mi91cmw/dT1odHRwLTNBX19saXN0cy5pbmZyYWRlYWQub3JnX21haWxtYW5f bGlzdGluZm9fbGludXgtMkRhcm0tMkRrZXJuZWwmZD1Ed0lDYVEmYz1EUEw2X1hfNkprWEZ4N0FY V3FCMHRnJnI9czJmTzBoaWkwT0dOT3Y5cVF5X0hSWHkteEFKVUQxTk5vRWNjM2lvX2t4MCZtPXlR eDd5YnUtSkdjUFBoNlpsUXl4a0M2X1V3NjJjdUJLTGI3bzN6cEs3aFEmcz1vLXRSMG1aNXlLTlRU WEtYMU1SN051RExwSGZ2U0hJanppNDdZTHVlMGFBJmU9IAo+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+PiBMdWNhcywKPj4+ Pj4KPj4+Pj4gQW55IHRob3VnaHRzIG9uIHdoeSBlbmFibGluZyBNU0kgb24gSU1YNiBicmVha3Mg bGVnYWN5IGludGVycnVwdHM/Cj4+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4+IEFnYWluLCBtYW55IFBDSSBkZXZpY2VzL2Ry aXZlcnMgZG9uJ3Qgc3VwcG9ydCBNU0kgYW5kIHRodXMgZW5hYmxpbmcKPj4+Pj4gTVNJIGFzIHRo aXMgcGF0Y2ggZG9lcyBtYWtlcyB0aGlzIGNvbmZpZyBicmVhayBtYW55IFBDSSBkZXZpY2VzIG9u Cj4+Pj4+IElNWDYuCj4+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4+IEkgaGF2ZSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IE1TSSBkb2VzIGluZGVl ZCB3b3JrIG9uIHRoZSBJTVg2IGZvciBjYXJkcy9kcml2ZXJzCj4+Pj4+IHRoYXQgdXNlIE1TSSwg YnV0IGZvciB0aG9zZSB0aGF0IGRvbid0IHRoZSBsZWdhY3kgaW50ZXJydXB0cyBuZXZlcgo+Pj4+ PiBmaXJlIHJlZ2FyZGxlc3Mgb2YgZ29pbmcgdGhyb3VnaCBhIGJyaWRnZSBvciBkaXJlY3RseSBo YW5naW5nIG9mZiB0aGUKPj4+Pj4gSU1YNi4gSSBhc3N1bWUgeW91IGNhbiBjb25maXJtIHRoaXMg b24geW91ciBib2FyZHMvZGV2aWNlcyBhcyB3ZWxsPwo+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+IE5vLCB0aGlzIHNlZW1z IHRvIGJlIGFuIGVycmF0YSBpbiB0aGUgRFcgUENJZSBjb3JlLiBUaGUgbWFudWFsIHN0YXRlcwo+ Pj4+IHRoYXQgbGVnYWN5IElSUXMgYW5kIE1TSXMgY2FuJ3QgYmUgdXNlZCB0b2dldGhlciwgYnV0 IEkgdGhvdWdodCB0aGlzCj4+Pj4gb25seSBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoZSBFUCBwYXJ0IG9mIHRoZSBj b3JlLgo+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4gV2UgY2FuIHByb2JhYmx5IGZpeCB0aGUgc2ltcGxlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRp b24gYnkgbm90IGVuYWJsaW5nIE1TSQo+PiBzdXBwb3J0Cj4+Pj4gdW50aWwgc29tZW9uZSBhY3R1 YWxseSByZXF1ZXN0cyB0byBzZXQgdXAgYW4gTVNJIElSUSwgc28gYm90aCBJUlEgdHlwZXMKPj4+ PiB3b3JrIHdoZW4gb25seSBvbmUgRVAgaXMgY29ubmVjdGVkLgo+Pj4+IEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBh bnkgaWRlYSB5ZXQgaG93IHRvIGZpeCBzZXR1cHMgd2l0aCBhIFBDSWUgc3dpdGNoIHdoZXJlCj4+ Pj4gc29tZSBjb25uZWN0ZWQgRVBzIG1pZ2h0IGxpa2UgdG8gdXNlIE1TSXMgd2hpbGUgc29tZSBv dGhlcnMgY2FuJ3QgdXNlCj4+Pj4gdGhlbS4KPj4+Pgo+Pj4+IFJlZ2FyZHMsCj4+Pj4gTHVjYXMK Pj4+Pgo+Pj4KPj4+IEx1Y2FzLAo+Pj4KPj4+IEkgZmVlbCBhIGJpdCBkdW1iIGhlcmUgZm9yIGZv cmdldHRpbmcgYWJvdXQgdGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBhbmQgbGV0dGluZyBpdAo+Pj4gZHJvcCwgYnV0IEkn dmUganVzdCBzcGVudCBhIGRheSBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgYW4gaXNzdWUgd2l0aCB0aGUgYXRoOWsKPj4+ IHdpcmVsZXNzIGRyaXZlciBvbmx5IHRvIHJlYWxpemUgaXQgd2FzIHRoYXQgdGhlIGF0aDlrIGNh cmQgYW5kL29yCj4+PiBkcml2ZXIgZG9lc24ndCBzdXBwb3J0IE1TSSBpbnRlcnJ1cHRzIGFuZCB0 aHVzIG5vIGxvbmdlciB3b3JrIG9uCj4+PiBtYWlubGluZSBrZXJuZWxzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBNU0kg ZW5hYmxlZC4gVG8gYmUgaG9uZXN0IEknbSBub3Qgc3VyZSBob3cKPj4+IG1hbnkgUENJZSBkZXZp Y2VzIG91dCB0aGVyZSBjYW4ndCBzdXBwb3J0IE1TSSBiZWNhdXNlIG9mIGhhcmR3YXJlCj4+PiBs aW1pdGF0aW9ucyB2cyBkcml2ZXJzIHRoYXQgc2ltcGx5IGhhdmUgbm90IGltcGxlbWVudGVkIGl0 Lgo+Pj4KPj4+IFRvIG1ha2UgbWF0dGVycyB3b3JzZSAzZWU4MDM2NDFlNzZiZWE3NmVjNzMwYzgw ZGNjNjQ3MzlhOTkxOWZmIG1ha2VzCj4+PiBpdCBzdWNoIHRoYXQgeW91IGNhbid0IGRpc2FibGUg TVNJIG9uIHRoZSBJTVg2Lgo+Pj4KPj4+IElzIHRoZXJlIHNvbWUgZml4IHlvdSBjYW4gdGhpbmsg b2YgdG8gbWFrZSB0aGUgSU1YNiBQQ0llIGhvc3QKPj4+IGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgcmFpc2UgYW4gaW50 ZXJydXB0IGZvciBjYXJkcy9kcml2ZXJzIHRoYXQgdXNlIGxlZ2FjeSBpcnEncz8KPj4+IElmIG5v dCwgdGhlbiB3ZSBuZWVkIHRvIGFsbG93IE1TSSB0byBiZSBkaXNhYmxlZCBmb3IgSU1YNiBhbmQg ZGVmYXVsdAo+Pj4gaXQgdG8gZGlzYWJsZWQgZm9yIGNvbXBhdGliaWxpdHkuCj4+Pgo+Pgo+PiBK b2FvIC8gSmluZ29vLAo+Pgo+PiAoQWRkaW5nIGxpbnV4LXBjaSB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCB0byBwaWNr IHVwIG1haW50YWluZXJzIG9mIG90aGVyIERXQyBQQ0llCj4+IGNvcmUgZHJpdmVycykKPj4KPj4g SXMgTHVjYSdzIHN0YXRlbWVudCB0aGF0ICdsZWdhY3kgSVJRcyBhbmQgTVNJcyBjYW4ndCBiZSB1 c2VkIHRvZ2V0aGVyJwo+PiB0cnVlIGluIGdlbmVyYWwgZm9yIHRoZSBEVyBQQ0llIGNvcmU/IElm IGFueSBvZiB0aGUgaG9zdCBjb250cm9sbGVycwo+PiB1c2luZyB0aGlzIGNvcmUgY2FuJ3Qgc3Vw cG9ydCBib3RoIGxlZ2FjeSBhbmQgTVNJIGlycXMgdG9nZXRoZXIgSQo+PiBzdGlsbCBiZWxpZXZl IHdlIHNob3VsZG4ndCBlbmFibGUvcmVxdWlyZSBNU0kgYXMgaXQgYnJlYWtzIGFueQo+PiBjYXJk L2RyaXZlciB0aGF0IG9ubHkgc3VwcG9ydHMgbGVnYWN5IGludGVycnVwdHMgKHN1Y2ggYXMgYXRo OWspLgo+IAo+IElmIHRoZXJlIGFyZSAyIERXIFBDSWUgY29udHJvbGxlcnMsIG9uZSBjb250cm9s bGVyIGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIGZvciBsZWdhY3kKPiBhbmQgYW5vdGhlciBjb250cm9sbGVyIGNhbiBi ZSB1c2VkIGZvciBNU0kuCj4gCj4gQnV0LCBJIGFtIG5vdCBzdXJlIHRoYXQgb25lIERXIFBDSWUg Y29udHJvbGxlciBjYW4gc3VwcG9ydCBib3RoIE1TSSBkZXZpY2UKPiBhbmQgbGVnYWN5IGludGVy cnVwdCBkZXZpY2UgYXQgdGhlIHNhbWUgdGltZS4KPiAKPiBUbyBKb2FvIFBpbnRvLAo+IFdpbGwg eW91IGNvbmZpcm0gdGhpcz8KPiAKCkhpIEppbmdvbywKSSBjb25maXJtIHRoYXQgaWYgYSBSQyBo YXMgTVNJIGVuYWJsZSwgaXQgd29uJ3Qgc3VwcG9ydCBsZWdhY3kgaW50ZXJydXB0cy4KClJlZ2Fy ZHMsCkpvYW8KCj4gT3IgaWYgdGhlcmUgaXMgYW55b25lIHdobyBrbm93cyB0aGlzIHdlbGwsIHBs ZWFzZSBzaGFyZSB5b3VyIGtub3dsZWRnZS4gOi0pCj4gVGhhbmtzLgo+IAo+IEJlc3QgcmVnYXJk cywKPiBKaW5nb28gSGFuCj4gCj4+Cj4+IFJlZ2FyZHMsCj4+Cj4+IFRpbQo+IAoKCl9fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmxpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJuZWwg bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CmxpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJuZWxAbGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZwpodHRwOi8v bGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2xpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJuZWwK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-04-05 12:07 ` Joao Pinto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-04-05 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel ?s 9:54 PM de 4/4/2017, Jingoo Han escreveu: > On Friday, March 31, 2017 12:05 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >> wrote: >>>> Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2016, 08:13 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >> wrote: >>>>>> This has been stable on i.MX6 for a good while now and there is no >>>>>> reason to keep it disabled, as it allows to allocate non-shared >>>>>> IRQs if several PCIe devices are connected to a single host. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >> b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>>>>> index 4187f69f6630..e2ce60d00e8a 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig >>>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D=y >>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A=y >>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_VF610=y >>>>>> CONFIG_PCI=y >>>>>> +CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y >>>>>> CONFIG_PCI_IMX6=y >>>>>> CONFIG_SMP=y >>>>>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.6.2 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >>>>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_mailman_listinfo_linux-2Darm-2Dkernel&d=DwICaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=yQx7ybu-JGcPPh6ZlQyxkC6_Uw62cuBKLb7o3zpK7hQ&s=o-tR0mZ5yKNTTXKX1MR7NuDLpHfvSHIjzi47YLue0aA&e= >>>>> >>>>> Lucas, >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts on why enabling MSI on IMX6 breaks legacy interrupts? >>>>> >>>>> Again, many PCI devices/drivers don't support MSI and thus enabling >>>>> MSI as this patch does makes this config break many PCI devices on >>>>> IMX6. >>>>> >>>>> I have found that MSI does indeed work on the IMX6 for cards/drivers >>>>> that use MSI, but for those that don't the legacy interrupts never >>>>> fire regardless of going through a bridge or directly hanging off the >>>>> IMX6. I assume you can confirm this on your boards/devices as well? >>>>> >>>> No, this seems to be an errata in the DW PCIe core. The manual states >>>> that legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together, but I thought this >>>> only applies to the EP part of the core. >>>> >>>> We can probably fix the simple configuration by not enabling MSI >> support >>>> until someone actually requests to set up an MSI IRQ, so both IRQ types >>>> work when only one EP is connected. >>>> I don't have any idea yet how to fix setups with a PCIe switch where >>>> some connected EPs might like to use MSIs while some others can't use >>>> them. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Lucas >>>> >>> >>> Lucas, >>> >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. >>> >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. >>> >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default >>> it to disabled for compatibility. >>> >> >> Joao / Jingoo, >> >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe >> core drivers) >> >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). > > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy > and another controller can be used for MSI. > > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. > > To Joao Pinto, > Will you confirm this? > Hi Jingoo, I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. Regards, Joao > Or if there is anyone who knows this well, please share your knowledge. :-) > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Jingoo Han > >> >> Regards, >> >> Tim > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-04-05 12:07 ` Joao Pinto @ 2017-04-05 12:16 ` Lucas Stach -1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2017-04-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joao Pinto, Tim Harvey Cc: Jingoo Han, patchwork-lst, 'Krzysztof Hałasa', 'Sascha Hauer', linux-pci, 'Shawn Guo', linux-arm-kernel Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: [...] > >>> Lucas, > >>> > >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > >>> > >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > >>> > >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > >>> it to disabled for compatibility. > >>> > >> > >> Joao / Jingoo, > >> > >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > >> core drivers) > >> > >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). > > > > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy > > and another controller can be used for MSI. > > > > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device > > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. > > > > To Joao Pinto, > > Will you confirm this? > > > > Hi Jingoo, > I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually requests an MSI irq. Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting requirements connected to the RC in that case. I'll cook up some patches to implement this. Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-04-05 12:16 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2017-04-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: [...] > >>> Lucas, > >>> > >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > >>> > >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > >>> > >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > >>> it to disabled for compatibility. > >>> > >> > >> Joao / Jingoo, > >> > >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > >> core drivers) > >> > >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). > > > > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy > > and another controller can be used for MSI. > > > > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device > > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. > > > > To Joao Pinto, > > Will you confirm this? > > > > Hi Jingoo, > I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually requests an MSI irq. Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting requirements connected to the RC in that case. I'll cook up some patches to implement this. Regards, Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-04-05 12:16 ` Lucas Stach @ 2017-04-11 16:05 ` Tim Harvey -1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2017-04-11 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Joao Pinto, Jingoo Han, patchwork-lst, Krzysztof Hałasa, Sascha Hauer, linux-pci, Shawn Guo, linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: > [...] >> >>> Lucas, >> >>> >> >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it >> >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k >> >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or >> >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on >> >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how >> >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware >> >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. >> >>> >> >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes >> >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. >> >>> >> >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host >> >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? >> >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default >> >>> it to disabled for compatibility. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Joao / Jingoo, >> >> >> >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe >> >> core drivers) >> >> >> >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' >> >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers >> >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I >> >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any >> >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). >> > >> > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy >> > and another controller can be used for MSI. >> > >> > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device >> > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. >> > >> > To Joao Pinto, >> > Will you confirm this? >> > >> >> Hi Jingoo, >> I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. > > Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at > the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually > requests an MSI irq. > > Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up > during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting > requirements connected to the RC in that case. > > I'll cook up some patches to implement this. > Lucas, Any thoughts yet? I'll likely want to backport this to stable although the restructuring to drivers/pci/dwc and subsequent changes since 4.10 will likely require a re-written patch. Best regards, Tim _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-04-11 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Tim Harvey @ 2017-04-11 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: > [...] >> >>> Lucas, >> >>> >> >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it >> >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k >> >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or >> >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on >> >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how >> >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware >> >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. >> >>> >> >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes >> >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. >> >>> >> >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host >> >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? >> >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default >> >>> it to disabled for compatibility. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Joao / Jingoo, >> >> >> >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe >> >> core drivers) >> >> >> >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' >> >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers >> >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I >> >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any >> >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). >> > >> > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy >> > and another controller can be used for MSI. >> > >> > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device >> > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. >> > >> > To Joao Pinto, >> > Will you confirm this? >> > >> >> Hi Jingoo, >> I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. > > Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at > the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually > requests an MSI irq. > > Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up > during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting > requirements connected to the RC in that case. > > I'll cook up some patches to implement this. > Lucas, Any thoughts yet? I'll likely want to backport this to stable although the restructuring to drivers/pci/dwc and subsequent changes since 4.10 will likely require a re-written patch. Best regards, Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI 2017-04-11 16:05 ` Tim Harvey @ 2017-04-26 11:50 ` Lucas Stach -1 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2017-04-26 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Harvey Cc: Joao Pinto, Jingoo Han, patchwork-lst, Krzysztof Hałasa, Sascha Hauer, linux-pci, Shawn Guo, linux-arm-kernel Hi Tim, Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2017, 09:05 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: > > [...] > >> >>> Lucas, > >> >>> > >> >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > >> >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > >> >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > >> >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > >> >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > >> >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > >> >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > >> >>> > >> >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > >> >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > >> >>> > >> >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > >> >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > >> >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > >> >>> it to disabled for compatibility. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Joao / Jingoo, > >> >> > >> >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > >> >> core drivers) > >> >> > >> >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > >> >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > >> >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > >> >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > >> >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). > >> > > >> > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy > >> > and another controller can be used for MSI. > >> > > >> > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device > >> > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. > >> > > >> > To Joao Pinto, > >> > Will you confirm this? > >> > > >> > >> Hi Jingoo, > >> I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. > > > > Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at > > the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually > > requests an MSI irq. > > > > Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up > > during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting > > requirements connected to the RC in that case. > > > > I'll cook up some patches to implement this. > > > > Lucas, > > Any thoughts yet? I'll likely want to backport this to stable although > the restructuring to drivers/pci/dwc and subsequent changes since 4.10 > will likely require a re-written patch. I have a fix for this, that I'm currently testing on different setups. I'll probably send it out in a few hours. Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI @ 2017-04-26 11:50 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2017-04-26 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Tim, Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2017, 09:05 -0700 schrieb Tim Harvey: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 05.04.2017, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Joao Pinto: > > [...] > >> >>> Lucas, > >> >>> > >> >>> I feel a bit dumb here for forgetting about this issue and letting it > >> >>> drop, but I've just spent a day debugging an issue with the ath9k > >> >>> wireless driver only to realize it was that the ath9k card and/or > >> >>> driver doesn't support MSI interrupts and thus no longer work on > >> >>> mainline kernels that have MSI enabled. To be honest I'm not sure how > >> >>> many PCIe devices out there can't support MSI because of hardware > >> >>> limitations vs drivers that simply have not implemented it. > >> >>> > >> >>> To make matters worse 3ee803641e76bea76ec730c80dcc64739a9919ff makes > >> >>> it such that you can't disable MSI on the IMX6. > >> >>> > >> >>> Is there some fix you can think of to make the IMX6 PCIe host > >> >>> controller raise an interrupt for cards/drivers that use legacy irq's? > >> >>> If not, then we need to allow MSI to be disabled for IMX6 and default > >> >>> it to disabled for compatibility. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Joao / Jingoo, > >> >> > >> >> (Adding linux-pci to the list to pick up maintainers of other DWC PCIe > >> >> core drivers) > >> >> > >> >> Is Luca's statement that 'legacy IRQs and MSIs can't be used together' > >> >> true in general for the DW PCIe core? If any of the host controllers > >> >> using this core can't support both legacy and MSI irqs together I > >> >> still believe we shouldn't enable/require MSI as it breaks any > >> >> card/driver that only supports legacy interrupts (such as ath9k). > >> > > >> > If there are 2 DW PCIe controllers, one controller can be used for legacy > >> > and another controller can be used for MSI. > >> > > >> > But, I am not sure that one DW PCIe controller can support both MSI device > >> > and legacy interrupt device at the same time. > >> > > >> > To Joao Pinto, > >> > Will you confirm this? > >> > > >> > >> Hi Jingoo, > >> I confirm that if a RC has MSI enable, it won't support legacy interrupts. > > > > Okay, so the only way to solve this in a generic way, that I can see at > > the moment is to defer MSI enable until the downstream device actually > > requests an MSI irq. > > > > Also we need to disable the MSI capability if any bridge device turns up > > during the bus topology scan, as we can have devices with conflicting > > requirements connected to the RC in that case. > > > > I'll cook up some patches to implement this. > > > > Lucas, > > Any thoughts yet? I'll likely want to backport this to stable although > the restructuring to drivers/pci/dwc and subsequent changes since 4.10 > will likely require a re-written patch. I have a fix for this, that I'm currently testing on different setups. I'll probably send it out in a few hours. Regards, Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property 2015-11-30 17:00 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Lucas Stach 2015-11-30 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI Lucas Stach @ 2015-12-02 8:01 ` Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2015-12-02 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:00:10PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > This has been moved to the reg property where it belongs for quite some > time. The range has been unused by the kernel since then and with kernel > 4.4 it's flagged as an unparsable range, as it does not comply to the > PCI ranges DT binding. Fix this by removing the superfluous range. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Changed patch prefix to 'ARM: dts: imx6: ...', and applied. Shawn > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi > index 2b6cc8bf3c5c..a5a731519d9e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi > @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ > #address-cells = <3>; > #size-cells = <2>; > device_type = "pci"; > - ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x01f00000 0x01f00000 0 0x00080000 /* configuration space */ > - 0x81000000 0 0 0x01f80000 0 0x00010000 /* downstream I/O */ > + ranges = <0x81000000 0 0 0x01f80000 0 0x00010000 /* downstream I/O */ > 0x82000000 0 0x01000000 0x01000000 0 0x00f00000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */ > num-lanes = <1>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 120 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > -- > 2.6.2 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-26 11:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-11-30 17:00 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Lucas Stach 2015-11-30 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: enable PCI_MSI Lucas Stach 2015-12-02 8:03 ` Shawn Guo 2016-04-14 15:13 ` Tim Harvey 2016-04-15 8:21 ` Lucas Stach 2017-03-30 23:42 ` Tim Harvey 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 2017-03-31 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 2017-04-04 20:54 ` Jingoo Han 2017-04-04 20:54 ` Jingoo Han 2017-04-05 12:07 ` Joao Pinto 2017-04-05 12:07 ` Joao Pinto 2017-04-05 12:16 ` Lucas Stach 2017-04-05 12:16 ` Lucas Stach 2017-04-11 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 2017-04-11 16:05 ` Tim Harvey 2017-04-26 11:50 ` Lucas Stach 2017-04-26 11:50 ` Lucas Stach 2015-12-02 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx6: remove config space from PCIe controller ranges property Shawn Guo
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.