All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: vkuznets@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com,
	haiyangz@microsoft.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:25:58 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160110.172558.367101858392871618.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452159189-11473-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2016 10:33:09 +0100

> Recent changes to 'struct flow_keys' (e.g commit d34af823ff40 ("net: Add
>  VLAN ID to flow_keys")) introduced a performance regression in netvsc
> driver. Is problem is, however, not the above mentioned commit but the
> fact that netvsc_set_hash() function did some assumptions on the struct
> flow_keys data layout and this is wrong. We need to extract the data we
> need (src/dst addresses and ports) after the dissect.
> 
> The issue could also be solved in a completely different way: as suggested
> by Eric instead of our own homegrown netvsc_set_hash() we could use
> skb_get_hash() which does more or less the same. Unfortunately, the
> testing done by Simon showed that Hyper-V hosts are not happy with our
> Jenkins hash, selecting the output queue with the current algorithm based
> on Toeplitz hash works significantly better.
> 
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Stop using this Toeplitz thing and just use the proper hash the stack
is already calculating for you.

There is no way this is faster, and the continued attempts to
shoe-horn Toeplitz usage into this driver is resulting in incredibly
ugly and rediculous code.

I'm not applying any patches that further the use of Toeplitz as the
hash function in this driver.  You must use the clean,
efficient, facilities the kernel has already for packet hashing.

If every driver did what you guys are doing, we'd be in a heap of
trouble, and I'm simply not going to allow this to continue any
longer.

Thanks.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: vkuznets@redhat.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	haiyangz@microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:25:58 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160110.172558.367101858392871618.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452159189-11473-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2016 10:33:09 +0100

> Recent changes to 'struct flow_keys' (e.g commit d34af823ff40 ("net: Add
>  VLAN ID to flow_keys")) introduced a performance regression in netvsc
> driver. Is problem is, however, not the above mentioned commit but the
> fact that netvsc_set_hash() function did some assumptions on the struct
> flow_keys data layout and this is wrong. We need to extract the data we
> need (src/dst addresses and ports) after the dissect.
> 
> The issue could also be solved in a completely different way: as suggested
> by Eric instead of our own homegrown netvsc_set_hash() we could use
> skb_get_hash() which does more or less the same. Unfortunately, the
> testing done by Simon showed that Hyper-V hosts are not happy with our
> Jenkins hash, selecting the output queue with the current algorithm based
> on Toeplitz hash works significantly better.
> 
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Stop using this Toeplitz thing and just use the proper hash the stack
is already calculating for you.

There is no way this is faster, and the continued attempts to
shoe-horn Toeplitz usage into this driver is resulting in incredibly
ugly and rediculous code.

I'm not applying any patches that further the use of Toeplitz as the
hash function in this driver.  You must use the clean,
efficient, facilities the kernel has already for packet hashing.

If every driver did what you guys are doing, we'd be in a heap of
trouble, and I'm simply not going to allow this to continue any
longer.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-10 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-07  9:33 [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-01-07  9:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-01-07 12:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-07 13:28   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-01-07 13:28     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-01-08  1:02     ` John Fastabend
2016-01-08  3:49       ` KY Srinivasan
2016-01-08  3:49         ` KY Srinivasan
2016-01-08  6:16         ` John Fastabend
2016-01-08  6:16           ` John Fastabend
2016-01-08 18:01           ` KY Srinivasan
2016-01-08 21:07     ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-08 21:07       ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-09  0:17   ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-09  0:17     ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-10 22:25 ` David Miller [this message]
2016-01-10 22:25   ` David Miller
2016-01-13 23:10   ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-13 23:10     ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14  4:56     ` David Miller
2016-01-14  4:56       ` David Miller
2016-01-14 17:14     ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 17:14       ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 17:53       ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-14 17:53         ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-14 18:24         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-14 18:24           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-14 18:35           ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 18:35             ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 18:48             ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 19:15               ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 19:15                 ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 19:41                 ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 20:23                   ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 20:23                     ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 21:44                     ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 21:44                       ` Tom Herbert
2016-01-14 22:06                       ` David Miller
2016-01-14 22:08                     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-14 22:08                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-14 22:29                       ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 22:29                         ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-01-14 17:53     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160110.172558.367101858392871618.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.