All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com,
	swarren@wwwdotorg.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:47:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160229174751.GQ21240@tuxbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456756829-2277-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>

On Mon 29 Feb 06:40 PST 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> It is observed that voltage change in given rail affected by the load
> and the capacitor in the rail. This may cause the slow ramp in voltage
> against what PMIC has programmed.
> 
> The property regulator-ramp-delay provides the ramp delay configuration
> for PMIC but actual voltage settling time may change based on platform.
> 
> Add new property "regulator-ramp-delay-scale" for platform specific scaling
> in final ramp delay calculation. On this case, final wait delay time
> for voltage change is calculated as the
>    DIV_ROUND_UP(ramp_delay * ramp_delay_scale, 100)
> 
> The value is provided in the term of percentage i.e. 300% means it will
> do the 3x delay of calculated value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> ---

The regulator-ramp-delay is a variable you can tweak on a board basis,
so I'm not sure what benefit it gives to be able to add a scaling
factor to this.

In my experience your HW engineer will say "you have to wait X ms", not
"you have to wait 125% of X ms".


Can you please elaborate on why the original knob isn't sufficient?

Regards,
Bjorn

>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> index 1d112fc..f2e8360 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> @@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ Optional properties:
>  - regulator-ramp-delay: ramp delay for regulator(in uV/uS)
>    For hardware which supports disabling ramp rate, it should be explicitly
>    initialised to zero (regulator-ramp-delay = <0>) for disabling ramp delay.
> +- regulator-ramp-delay-scale: Platform specific scaling in ramp delay to
> +  provide extra guard time to settle down voltage after its change. This will
> +  help to wait for extra time for voltage settling based on platform behavior.
> +  This is provided in terms of percentage scaling like 300% means final delay
> +  will become 3x of calculated ramp delay for voltage change.
> +  The final delay is calculated as:
> +	delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(ramp-delay * ramp-delay-scale, 100)
>  - regulator-enable-ramp-delay: The time taken, in microseconds, for the supply
>    rail to reach the target voltage, plus/minus whatever tolerance the board
>    design requires. This property describes the total system ramp time
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
	lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	bjorn.andersson-/MT0OVThwyLZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org,
	swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:47:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160229174751.GQ21240@tuxbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456756829-2277-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Mon 29 Feb 06:40 PST 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> It is observed that voltage change in given rail affected by the load
> and the capacitor in the rail. This may cause the slow ramp in voltage
> against what PMIC has programmed.
> 
> The property regulator-ramp-delay provides the ramp delay configuration
> for PMIC but actual voltage settling time may change based on platform.
> 
> Add new property "regulator-ramp-delay-scale" for platform specific scaling
> in final ramp delay calculation. On this case, final wait delay time
> for voltage change is calculated as the
>    DIV_ROUND_UP(ramp_delay * ramp_delay_scale, 100)
> 
> The value is provided in the term of percentage i.e. 300% means it will
> do the 3x delay of calculated value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---

The regulator-ramp-delay is a variable you can tweak on a board basis,
so I'm not sure what benefit it gives to be able to add a scaling
factor to this.

In my experience your HW engineer will say "you have to wait X ms", not
"you have to wait 125% of X ms".


Can you please elaborate on why the original knob isn't sufficient?

Regards,
Bjorn

>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> index 1d112fc..f2e8360 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> @@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ Optional properties:
>  - regulator-ramp-delay: ramp delay for regulator(in uV/uS)
>    For hardware which supports disabling ramp rate, it should be explicitly
>    initialised to zero (regulator-ramp-delay = <0>) for disabling ramp delay.
> +- regulator-ramp-delay-scale: Platform specific scaling in ramp delay to
> +  provide extra guard time to settle down voltage after its change. This will
> +  help to wait for extra time for voltage settling based on platform behavior.
> +  This is provided in terms of percentage scaling like 300% means final delay
> +  will become 3x of calculated ramp delay for voltage change.
> +  The final delay is calculated as:
> +	delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(ramp-delay * ramp-delay-scale, 100)
>  - regulator-enable-ramp-delay: The time taken, in microseconds, for the supply
>    rail to reach the target voltage, plus/minus whatever tolerance the board
>    design requires. This property describes the total system ramp time
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-29 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 17:47 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2016-02-29 17:47   ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: " Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-01  2:23   ` Mark Brown
2016-03-01  2:23     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-01  3:48     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-01  3:48       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  3:38       ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  3:38         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  3:35         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  3:35           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  4:35           ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  4:35             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  6:12             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  6:12               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 13:41             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 13:41               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:48               ` Mark Brown
2016-03-15 14:48                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-16 11:30                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-16 11:30                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-19  4:31               ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-19  8:35                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 13:29                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 18:16                     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31  7:06                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 16:51                         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:13                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:13                             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:47                             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:47                               ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:47                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:47                                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:31                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:31                                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:31                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:45                                     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:39                                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:39                                         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:59                                         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:59                                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:59                                             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 19:22                                             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 19:48                                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 20:39                                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 20:39                                                   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-01  7:15                                                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-01  7:15                                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-01 16:11                                                     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-05  8:01                                                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-05  8:01                                                         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-12  1:02                                                         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12  1:02                                                           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12 13:29                                                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-13  6:53                                                             ` Mark Brown
2016-04-13  6:53                                                               ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:01                                                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 10:55                                                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:56                                                                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 10:56                                                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 15:47                                                                     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160229174751.GQ21240@tuxbot \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.