All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gandhar Dighe <gdighe@nvidia.com>,
	"Stuart Yates" <syates@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:01:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FD6CF7.5080909@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160331183130.GR2350@sirena.org.uk>


On Friday 01 April 2016 12:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:17:38PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> HW and chip team did simulation with tegra and PMIC and found that the board
>> needs more capacitance then what Vendor recommended for proper signal
>> conditioning on interface. So they put the difference capactitance value and
>> this causes deviation in ramp delay from advertised value. In out design, we
>> measured the ramp time as 50mv/us when PMIC is configured for 100mV/us.
>> So for all settling time, we need to use the ramp as 50mV/us.
>>  From DT, I will provide regulator-ramp-delay as 50mv/us.
>> But I do not have property for saying 100mv/us for PMIC configurations and
>> this is what makes need of 2nd property.
> So the PMIC actually has a setting for the rate you're seeing but for
> some resaon you can't use it?

PMIC has the different rate setting what I am seeing on platform (measured).
HW team measured the ramp dealy with specific configuration of rate 
setting on PMIC which is not default (OTP-One time programmed from Vendor).

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn-UYDU3/A3LUY@public.gmane.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson
	<bjorn.andersson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Ian Campbell
	<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Gandhar Dighe <gdighe-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Stuart Yates <syates-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:01:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FD6CF7.5080909@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160331183130.GR2350-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>


On Friday 01 April 2016 12:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:17:38PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> HW and chip team did simulation with tegra and PMIC and found that the board
>> needs more capacitance then what Vendor recommended for proper signal
>> conditioning on interface. So they put the difference capactitance value and
>> this causes deviation in ramp delay from advertised value. In out design, we
>> measured the ramp time as 50mv/us when PMIC is configured for 100mV/us.
>> So for all settling time, we need to use the ramp as 50mV/us.
>>  From DT, I will provide regulator-ramp-delay as 50mv/us.
>> But I do not have property for saying 100mv/us for PMIC configurations and
>> this is what makes need of 2nd property.
> So the PMIC actually has a setting for the rate you're seeing but for
> some resaon you can't use it?

PMIC has the different rate setting what I am seeing on platform (measured).
HW team measured the ramp dealy with specific configuration of rate 
setting on PMIC which is not default (OTP-One time programmed from Vendor).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: " Bjorn Andersson
2016-02-29 17:47   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-01  2:23   ` Mark Brown
2016-03-01  2:23     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-01  3:48     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-01  3:48       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  3:38       ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  3:38         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  3:35         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  3:35           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  4:35           ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  4:35             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02  6:12             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02  6:12               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 13:41             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 13:41               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:48               ` Mark Brown
2016-03-15 14:48                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-16 11:30                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-16 11:30                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-19  4:31               ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-19  8:35                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 13:29                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 18:16                     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31  7:06                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 16:51                         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:13                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:13                             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:47                             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:47                               ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:47                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:47                                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:31                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:31                                   ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2016-03-31 18:31                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:45                                     ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:39                                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:39                                         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:59                                         ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:59                                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:59                                             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 19:22                                             ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 19:48                                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 20:39                                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 20:39                                                   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-01  7:15                                                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-01  7:15                                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-01 16:11                                                     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-05  8:01                                                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-05  8:01                                                         ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-12  1:02                                                         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12  1:02                                                           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12 13:29                                                           ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-13  6:53                                                             ` Mark Brown
2016-04-13  6:53                                                               ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:01                                                               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 10:55                                                                 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:56                                                                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 10:56                                                                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 15:47                                                                     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FD6CF7.5080909@nvidia.com \
    --to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kryo.se \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gdighe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=syates@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.