From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number.
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:13:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160530161350.GR29837@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574A063D.5030700@weinigel.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 498 bytes --]
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:57:33PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It is reasonable to provide and document something here but when there's
> > some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be doing it should
> > be those rather than the legacy stuff.
> So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead?
To repeat what Rob said adding a label property on the leaf device
nodes seems like a more sensible option.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Christer Weinigel <christer-rKHMIqA5R6gwFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand
<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number.
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:13:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160530161350.GR29837@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574A063D.5030700-rKHMIqA5R6gwFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 498 bytes --]
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:57:33PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It is reasonable to provide and document something here but when there's
> > some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be doing it should
> > be those rather than the legacy stuff.
> So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead?
To repeat what Rob said adding a label property on the leaf device
nodes seems like a more sensible option.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 16:39 [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number Christer Weinigel
2016-05-24 16:39 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-24 17:20 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-24 18:03 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-24 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-24 18:57 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-24 18:57 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-25 12:19 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 12:19 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 12:50 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 12:33 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 12:33 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-24 23:34 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-24 23:34 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 0:18 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 0:18 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 17:49 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-25 18:03 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 18:06 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 18:44 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 1:10 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-26 1:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-26 1:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-26 1:56 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-26 10:07 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 10:07 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 10:58 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-26 18:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 18:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 21:04 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-26 21:04 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-27 16:43 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-24 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-24 20:41 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 9:20 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 9:20 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 10:38 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 10:38 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 11:20 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-25 12:34 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 12:34 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 15:32 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 15:32 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 15:59 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 15:59 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 16:21 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 16:21 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 18:02 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 17:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 17:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 18:46 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-27 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-27 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-28 20:57 ` Christer Weinigel
2016-05-30 16:13 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-05-30 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 15:25 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 15:25 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 16:06 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 16:06 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-25 16:31 ` Frank Rowand
2016-05-25 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-25 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-25 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-25 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-05-26 8:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-05-26 8:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160530161350.GR29837@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.