From: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
dev@linux-sunxi.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721172712.GA10640@weiser.dinsnail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721163153.GO6509@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> version and submit it.
That's my point: There don't seem to be any.
v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html
v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html
I can't find any comments on v5 or v6.
--
Thanks,
Michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Olliver Schinagl <oliver-dxLnbx3+1qmEVqv0pETR8A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dev-3kdeTeqwOZ9EV1b7eY7vFQ@public.gmane.org,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721172712.GA10640@weiser.dinsnail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721163153.GO6509-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> version and submit it.
That's my point: There don't seem to be any.
v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html
v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html
I can't find any comments on v5 or v6.
--
Thanks,
Michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: michael.weiser@gmx.de (Michael Weiser)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721172712.GA10640@weiser.dinsnail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721163153.GO6509@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> version and submit it.
That's my point: There don't seem to be any.
v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html
v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html
I can't find any comments on v5 or v6.
--
Thanks,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-08 19:41 [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-08 19:41 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-08 19:41 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-08 19:41 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-08 19:41 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-08 19:41 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-07-21 11:27 ` Michael Weiser
2016-07-21 11:27 ` Michael Weiser
2016-07-21 11:27 ` Michael Weiser
2016-07-21 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 17:27 ` Michael Weiser [this message]
2016-07-21 17:27 ` Michael Weiser
2016-07-21 17:27 ` Michael Weiser
[not found] ` <20160721172712.GA10640-kvmrdUZdB1uagOi/AmBnLNHuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-21 18:03 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-07-21 18:15 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 18:15 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 18:15 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 18:20 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 18:20 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-21 18:20 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160721172712.GA10640@weiser.dinsnail.net \
--to=michael.weiser@gmx.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dev@linux-sunxi.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.