From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>, LKP <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:58:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815125801.GA21083@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwYcjXn7kpLFWQ=jF0sSrhEfZhqNsjR+6O89OOH9qRNOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:03:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't recall having ever seen the mapping tree_lock as a contention
>>> point before, but it's not like I've tried that load either. So it
>>> might be a regression (going back long, I suspect), or just an unusual
>>> load that nobody has traditionally tested much.
>>>
>>> Single-threaded big file write one page at a time, was it?
>>
>> Yup. On a 4 node NUMA system.
>
>Ok, I can't see any real contention on my single-node workstation
>(running ext4 too, so there may be filesystem differences), but I
>guess that shouldn't surprise me. The cacheline bouncing just isn't
>expensive enough when it all stays on-die.
>
>I can see the tree_lock in my profiles (just not very high), and at
>least for ext4 the main caller ssems to be
>__set_page_dirty_nobuffers().
>
>And yes, looking at that, the biggest cost by _far_ inside the
>spinlock seems to be the accounting.
>
>Which doesn't even have to be inside the mapping lock, as far as I can
>tell, and as far as comments go.
>
>So a stupid patch to just move the dirty page accounting to outside
>the spinlock might help a lot.
>
>Does this attached patch help your contention numbers?
Hi Linus,
The 1BRD tests finished and there are no conclusive changes.
The overall aim7 jobs-per-min slightly decreases and
the overall fsmark files_per_sec slightly increases,
however both are small enough (less than 1%), which are kind of
expected numbers.
NUMA test results should be available tomorrow.
99091700659f4df9 1b5f2eb4a752e1fa7102f37545 testcase/testparams/testbox
---------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
71443 71286 GEO-MEAN aim7.jobs-per-min
972 961 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-creat-clo-4-performance/ivb44
52205 51525 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_cp-1500-performance/ivb44
2184471 ± 4% -6% 2051740 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
47049 46630 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rr-1500-performance/ivb44
24932 -4% 23812 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rw-1500-performance/ivb44
5884 5856 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_src-500-performance/ivb44
51430 51286 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_wrt-1500-performance/ivb44
218 220 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-sync_disk_rw-10-performance/ivb44
22777 23199 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-creat-clo-1000-performance/ivb44
130085 128991 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
2434088 ± 3% -8% 2232211 ± 4% aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
130351 128977 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
73280 74044 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
277035 -3% 268057 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
127584 4% 132639 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
10571 10659 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
36924 ± 7% 36327 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-creat-clo-1500-performance/ivb44
117238 119130 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
2340512 ± 5% 2352619 ± 10% aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
107506 ± 9% 7% 114869 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
105642 106835 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
26900 ± 3% 26442 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
117124 ± 3% 117678 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
3689 3616 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
70897 72758 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-creat-clo-1500-performance/ivb44
267649 ± 3% 270867 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
485217 ± 3% 489403 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
360451 359042 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
338114 336838 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
60130 ± 5% 4% 62663 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
403144 401476 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
26327 26513 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
99091700659f4df9 1b5f2eb4a752e1fa7102f37545
---------------- --------------------------
2117 2138 GEO-MEAN fsmark.files_per_sec
4325 4379 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_32G-btrfs-4K-4G-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
9466 ± 3% 4% 9804 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_32G-ext4-4K-4G-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
433 ± 5% 424 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
185 ± 6% 5% 194 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
368 ± 3% -4% 355 ± 6% fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
191 191 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
393 ± 4% 397 ± 4% fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
200 201 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
924 -3% 896 ± 3% fsmark/1x-1t-1HDD-xfs-4K-400M-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
488 ± 3% 6% 516 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
559 564 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
1130 1111 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
526 ± 7% 6% 557 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
1583 ± 3% 1620 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
33202 33208 fsmark/8-1SSD-16-ext4-8K-75G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
33889 33784 fsmark/8-1SSD-16-ext4-9B-48G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
25576 25509 fsmark/8-1SSD-32-xfs-9B-30G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
9117 9079 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-btrfs-8K-24G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
13288 13261 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-btrfs-9B-16G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
18851 ± 11% 11% 21013 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-f2fs-8K-72G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
24343 -4% 23473 ± 4% fsmark/8-1SSD-4-f2fs-9B-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:58:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815125801.GA21083@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwYcjXn7kpLFWQ=jF0sSrhEfZhqNsjR+6O89OOH9qRNOw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7847 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:03:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't recall having ever seen the mapping tree_lock as a contention
>>> point before, but it's not like I've tried that load either. So it
>>> might be a regression (going back long, I suspect), or just an unusual
>>> load that nobody has traditionally tested much.
>>>
>>> Single-threaded big file write one page at a time, was it?
>>
>> Yup. On a 4 node NUMA system.
>
>Ok, I can't see any real contention on my single-node workstation
>(running ext4 too, so there may be filesystem differences), but I
>guess that shouldn't surprise me. The cacheline bouncing just isn't
>expensive enough when it all stays on-die.
>
>I can see the tree_lock in my profiles (just not very high), and at
>least for ext4 the main caller ssems to be
>__set_page_dirty_nobuffers().
>
>And yes, looking at that, the biggest cost by _far_ inside the
>spinlock seems to be the accounting.
>
>Which doesn't even have to be inside the mapping lock, as far as I can
>tell, and as far as comments go.
>
>So a stupid patch to just move the dirty page accounting to outside
>the spinlock might help a lot.
>
>Does this attached patch help your contention numbers?
Hi Linus,
The 1BRD tests finished and there are no conclusive changes.
The overall aim7 jobs-per-min slightly decreases and
the overall fsmark files_per_sec slightly increases,
however both are small enough (less than 1%), which are kind of
expected numbers.
NUMA test results should be available tomorrow.
99091700659f4df9 1b5f2eb4a752e1fa7102f37545 testcase/testparams/testbox
---------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
71443 71286 GEO-MEAN aim7.jobs-per-min
972 961 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-creat-clo-4-performance/ivb44
52205 51525 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_cp-1500-performance/ivb44
2184471 ± 4% -6% 2051740 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
47049 46630 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rr-1500-performance/ivb44
24932 -4% 23812 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_rw-1500-performance/ivb44
5884 5856 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_src-500-performance/ivb44
51430 51286 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-disk_wrt-1500-performance/ivb44
218 220 aim7/1BRD_48G-btrfs-sync_disk_rw-10-performance/ivb44
22777 23199 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-creat-clo-1000-performance/ivb44
130085 128991 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
2434088 ± 3% -8% 2232211 ± 4% aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
130351 128977 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
73280 74044 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
277035 -3% 268057 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
127584 4% 132639 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
10571 10659 aim7/1BRD_48G-ext4-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
36924 ± 7% 36327 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-creat-clo-1500-performance/ivb44
117238 119130 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
2340512 ± 5% 2352619 ± 10% aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
107506 ± 9% 7% 114869 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
105642 106835 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
26900 ± 3% 26442 ± 3% aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
117124 ± 3% 117678 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
3689 3616 aim7/1BRD_48G-f2fs-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
70897 72758 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-creat-clo-1500-performance/ivb44
267649 ± 3% 270867 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_cp-3000-performance/ivb44
485217 ± 3% 489403 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rd-9000-performance/ivb44
360451 359042 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rr-3000-performance/ivb44
338114 336838 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_rw-3000-performance/ivb44
60130 ± 5% 4% 62663 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_src-3000-performance/ivb44
403144 401476 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-disk_wrt-3000-performance/ivb44
26327 26513 aim7/1BRD_48G-xfs-sync_disk_rw-600-performance/ivb44
99091700659f4df9 1b5f2eb4a752e1fa7102f37545
---------------- --------------------------
2117 2138 GEO-MEAN fsmark.files_per_sec
4325 4379 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_32G-btrfs-4K-4G-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
9466 ± 3% 4% 9804 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_32G-ext4-4K-4G-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
433 ± 5% 424 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
185 ± 6% 5% 194 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
368 ± 3% -4% 355 ± 6% fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
191 191 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
393 ± 4% 397 ± 4% fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
200 201 fsmark/1x-1t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
924 -3% 896 ± 3% fsmark/1x-1t-1HDD-xfs-4K-400M-fsyncBeforeClose-1fpd-performance/ivb43
488 ± 3% 6% 516 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-btrfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
559 564 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
1130 1111 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
526 ± 7% 6% 557 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-NoSync-performance/ivb44
1583 ± 3% 1620 fsmark/1x-64t-1BRD_48G-xfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-performance/ivb44
33202 33208 fsmark/8-1SSD-16-ext4-8K-75G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
33889 33784 fsmark/8-1SSD-16-ext4-9B-48G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
25576 25509 fsmark/8-1SSD-32-xfs-9B-30G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
9117 9079 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-btrfs-8K-24G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
13288 13261 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-btrfs-9B-16G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
18851 ± 11% 11% 21013 fsmark/8-1SSD-4-f2fs-8K-72G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
24343 -4% 23473 ± 4% fsmark/8-1SSD-4-f2fs-9B-40G-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd-performance/lkp-hsw-ep4
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-15 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 219+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-09 14:33 [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression kernel test robot
2016-08-09 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2016-08-10 18:24 ` [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-10 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-10 23:08 ` [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-10 23:08 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-10 23:51 ` [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-10 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-10 23:58 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-10 23:58 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 0:11 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 0:11 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 0:23 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 0:33 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 0:33 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 1:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 4:46 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 4:46 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 17:22 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-15 17:22 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-16 0:08 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 15:57 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 16:55 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 17:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 17:51 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 19:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 20:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 20:35 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 22:16 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Al Viro
2016-08-11 22:16 ` Al Viro
2016-08-11 22:30 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 21:16 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 21:16 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 21:40 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-11 22:08 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 22:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-12 0:54 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 2:23 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 2:23 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 2:32 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 2:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 2:52 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-12 2:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-12 3:20 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 3:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 4:16 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 5:02 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 5:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 6:04 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 6:04 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 6:29 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-12 6:29 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-12 8:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-12 8:51 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-12 10:02 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 10:02 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 10:43 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-12 10:43 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 0:30 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 0:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 21:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 21:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 22:07 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 22:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 22:15 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 22:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-13 22:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 22:51 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-14 14:50 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-14 14:50 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-14 16:17 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-14 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-14 23:46 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-14 23:46 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-14 23:57 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-14 23:57 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-15 14:14 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-15 14:14 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-15 21:22 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 21:22 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 12:20 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-16 12:20 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-15 20:30 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-15 20:30 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-22 22:09 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-22 22:09 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 6:25 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 6:25 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 14:55 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-26 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 0:52 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-09-27 0:52 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-16 13:25 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-16 13:25 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 23:32 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-13 23:32 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 2:27 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 3:56 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 3:56 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 18:03 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-12 18:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-13 23:58 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-13 23:58 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-15 0:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 0:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 1:37 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 2:28 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 2:28 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 2:53 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 5:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 5:00 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwva2Xffai+Eqv1Jn_NGryk3YJ2i5JoHOQnbQv6qVPAsw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFy14nUnJQ_GdF=j8Fa9xiH70c6fY2G3q5HQ01+8z1z3qQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-15 5:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 22:22 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 22:42 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 22:42 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-15 23:20 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 23:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 23:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:44 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 15:05 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-16 15:05 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-16 17:47 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-17 15:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2016-08-17 15:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-17 16:42 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2016-08-17 16:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-17 15:49 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-17 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 0:45 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 0:45 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 7:11 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-18 7:11 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-18 13:24 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 13:24 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 17:55 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-18 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-18 21:19 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-18 21:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-18 22:25 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-18 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-19 9:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 9:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:49 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-19 10:49 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-19 23:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-19 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-20 1:08 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-20 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-20 12:16 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-20 12:16 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-19 15:08 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-19 15:08 ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-01 23:32 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-09-01 23:32 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-06 15:37 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-09-06 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-06 15:52 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-09-06 15:52 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-24 15:40 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-24 15:40 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-25 9:37 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mel Gorman
2016-08-25 9:37 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-18 2:44 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-18 2:44 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:15 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:38 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:38 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:50 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:19 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 1:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 1:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 22:02 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 22:02 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 23:23 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 23:01 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:17 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-16 0:45 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Linus Torvalds
2016-08-16 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-15 5:03 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Ingo Molnar
2016-08-15 5:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-17 16:24 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-17 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-15 12:58 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2016-08-15 12:58 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-11 1:16 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 1:32 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 1:32 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 2:36 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-11 2:36 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-08-11 3:05 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-11 3:05 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 1:26 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2016-08-12 1:26 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160815125801.GA21083@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.