All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: wharms@bfs.de, "Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	"SF Markus Elfring" <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:58:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160822145807.4b8fb1cb.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38bba070-d157-dc49-b428-47768ad647ca@redhat.com>

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:55:11 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> This is _not_ premature optimization.  (k)calloc tells the reader that
> it's safe not to initialize part of the array.  kmalloc_array says the
> opposite.  Using the right function adds important hints in the
> code---which unlike comments cannot get stale without also introducing
> visible bugs.

Ack. I'd accept a patch changing this to use kmalloc_array.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: wharms@bfs.de, "Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	"SF Markus Elfring" <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:58:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160822145807.4b8fb1cb.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38bba070-d157-dc49-b428-47768ad647ca@redhat.com>

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:55:11 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> This is _not_ premature optimization.  (k)calloc tells the reader that
> it's safe not to initialize part of the array.  kmalloc_array says the
> opposite.  Using the right function adds important hints in the
> code---which unlike comments cannot get stale without also introducing
> visible bugs.

Ack. I'd accept a patch changing this to use kmalloc_array.


  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-17 18:02 [PATCH 0/4] KVM-S390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:02 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:06   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-18  7:25   ` walter harms
2016-08-18  7:25     ` walter harms
2016-08-18  9:02     ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-18  9:02       ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-18  9:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-18  9:48         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-18 10:52         ` walter harms
2016-08-18 10:52           ` walter harms
2016-08-18 10:55           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-18 10:55             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-22 12:58             ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2016-08-22 12:58               ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-24 12:10         ` Replacing specific kmalloc() calls by kmalloc_array()? SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 12:10           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 15:00           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-24 15:00             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:08   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 13:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 13:02     ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 13:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 13:05     ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-24 15:19   ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-24 15:19     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-24 18:30     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 18:30       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 18:36       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 18:36         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 16:10         ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 16:10           ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 16:45           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 16:45             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 17:34           ` Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 17:34             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 17:40             ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 17:40               ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 17:54               ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 17:54                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 18:14             ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-25 18:14               ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-25 18:20               ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 18:20                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 18:23                 ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-25 18:23                   ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-25 21:04                   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 21:04                     ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-24 18:40       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-24 18:40         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 16:11         ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-25 16:11           ` Cornelia Huck
2016-10-03 12:11         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 12:11           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 12:28           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-03 12:28             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-03 13:10             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 13:10               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 13:47               ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-03 13:47                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-03 14:00                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 14:00                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-03 14:25                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-03 14:25                     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 16:12       ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-25 16:12         ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-17 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:10   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 12:58   ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 12:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 13:00   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 13:00     ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 16:56     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 16:56       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 19:37       ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 19:37         ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 21:17         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 21:17           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 21:28           ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 21:28             ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-31 12:29           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-31 12:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-24 15:10   ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-24 15:10     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-08-27 16:12     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-27 16:12       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for a buffer variable SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-17 18:12   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-22 12:59   ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 12:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-22 13:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-08-22 13:01     ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160822145807.4b8fb1cb.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.