From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, "Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, "David Hildenbrand" <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, "Walter Harms" <wharms@bfs.de> Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:25:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <da96837e-50bb-de1e-be42-0a22474edee8@users.sourceforge.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUS2aMd5B2nQOpQFdQGE7EvWMCea+dMzS7R7_yZ4LdONw@mail.gmail.com> >> * Does there really a probability remain that an inappropriate product >> would be calculated here (as the situation was before my two update steps >> for this software module)? > > Perhaps not. Hence my "Probably not an issue here, ...". Thanks for your clarification. >> * Can it be that you are looking for a variant of a function like "memdup_user" >> where values can be passed as separate parameters "count" and "size" so that >> the needed multiplication and corresponding overflow check would be performed >> together as desired? > > If there are enough uses, and people like it, adding memdup_user_array() > may be a good idea... How are the chances of such an addition for the Linux programming interface? > P.S. Why do your questions make me think of a scientific paper? ;-) Would you like to recommend any for further reading? ;-) Regards, Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, "Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, "David Hildenbrand" <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, "Walter Harms" <wharms@bfs.de> Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:25:34 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <da96837e-50bb-de1e-be42-0a22474edee8@users.sourceforge.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUS2aMd5B2nQOpQFdQGE7EvWMCea+dMzS7R7_yZ4LdONw@mail.gmail.com> >> * Does there really a probability remain that an inappropriate product >> would be calculated here (as the situation was before my two update steps >> for this software module)? > > Perhaps not. Hence my "Probably not an issue here, ...". Thanks for your clarification. >> * Can it be that you are looking for a variant of a function like "memdup_user" >> where values can be passed as separate parameters "count" and "size" so that >> the needed multiplication and corresponding overflow check would be performed >> together as desired? > > If there are enough uses, and people like it, adding memdup_user_array() > may be a good idea... How are the chances of such an addition for the Linux programming interface? > P.S. Why do your questions make me think of a scientific paper? ;-) Would you like to recommend any for further reading? ;-) Regards, Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 14:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-08-17 18:02 [PATCH 0/4] KVM-S390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:02 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:06 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-18 7:25 ` walter harms 2016-08-18 7:25 ` walter harms 2016-08-18 9:02 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-18 9:02 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-18 9:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-18 9:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-18 10:52 ` walter harms 2016-08-18 10:52 ` walter harms 2016-08-18 10:55 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-18 10:55 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-22 12:58 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 12:58 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-24 12:10 ` Replacing specific kmalloc() calls by kmalloc_array()? SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 12:10 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 15:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-24 15:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:08 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 13:05 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 13:05 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-24 15:19 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-24 15:19 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-24 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 18:30 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 18:36 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 16:10 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 16:10 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 16:45 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 16:45 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 17:34 ` Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 17:34 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 17:40 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 17:40 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 17:54 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 17:54 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 18:14 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-25 18:14 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-25 18:20 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 18:20 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 18:23 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-25 18:23 ` Julia Lawall 2016-08-25 21:04 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 21:04 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-24 18:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-24 18:40 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 16:11 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-25 16:11 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-10-03 12:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 12:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 12:28 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-10-03 12:28 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-10-03 13:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 13:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 13:47 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-10-03 13:47 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-10-03 14:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 14:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2016-10-03 14:25 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message] 2016-10-03 14:25 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-25 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data() Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-25 16:12 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-17 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:10 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 13:00 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 13:00 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 16:56 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 16:56 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 19:37 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 19:37 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 21:17 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 21:17 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 21:28 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 21:28 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-31 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-31 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-08-24 15:10 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-24 15:10 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-08-27 16:12 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-27 16:12 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for a buffer variable SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-17 18:12 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-08-22 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand 2016-08-22 13:01 ` Cornelia Huck 2016-08-22 13:01 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=da96837e-50bb-de1e-be42-0a22474edee8@users.sourceforge.net \ --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \ --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \ --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \ --cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \ --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \ --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \ --cc=wharms@bfs.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.