All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Fernando Apesteguía" <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@gmail.com>,
	driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: replace DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD macro
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:40:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018064018.GB7796@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2YfAKsifsjXr9fydMfVV+Obv-1mBebXwXAWrNHSNJt+mg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:46:36PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:22:57PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguia wrote:
> >> The patch replaces the macro with a function (dgnc_get_board) and
> >> substitutes the macro statement with a call to that function and a
> >> comparison on the returned value.
> >>
> >> This removes a checkpatch warning.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> index 290bf6e..3ea23a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> @@ -90,17 +90,21 @@ void dgnc_remove_driver_sysfiles(struct pci_driver *dgnc_driver)
> >>       driver_remove_file(driverfs, &driver_attr_pollrate);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -#define DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD(p, bd)                             \
> >> -     do {                                                    \
> >> -             if (!p)                                         \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -                                                             \
> >> -             bd = dev_get_drvdata(p);                        \
> >> -             if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC)       \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -             if (bd->state != BOARD_READY)                   \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -     } while (0)
> >> +static struct dgnc_board *dgnc_get_board(struct device *p)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct dgnc_board *bd;
> >> +
> >> +     if (!p)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +     bd = dev_get_drvdata(p);
> >> +     if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +     if (bd->state != BOARD_READY)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +     return bd;
> >> +}
> >
> > No, this macro should be removed entirely as what it does is pointless
> > in some parts, wrong in others, and not needed at all in the rest :(
> >
> > I've asked others to fix this up properly in the past, but it doesn't
> > seem like anyone wants to do the work...
> >
> 
> I tried to find the discussion the relevant mails in lkml.org but
> couldn't find them. Could  you point me to them so I can have a look?

Last time I mentioned this, it was on the outreachy-kernel mailing list.

Just walk through the code for yourself and see which, if any, of these
things could ever actually cause the function to "fail".  I think you
will find that none of them can ever happen...

The first test is a huge proof that the original author didn't
understand how sysfs or "container_of()" works, given that it is
impossible to ever have happen.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Fernando Apesteguía" <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@gmail.com>,
	driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: replace DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD macro
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:40:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018064018.GB7796@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2YfAKsifsjXr9fydMfVV+Obv-1mBebXwXAWrNHSNJt+mg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:46:36PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:22:57PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguia wrote:
> >> The patch replaces the macro with a function (dgnc_get_board) and
> >> substitutes the macro statement with a call to that function and a
> >> comparison on the returned value.
> >>
> >> This removes a checkpatch warning.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> index 290bf6e..3ea23a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c
> >> @@ -90,17 +90,21 @@ void dgnc_remove_driver_sysfiles(struct pci_driver *dgnc_driver)
> >>       driver_remove_file(driverfs, &driver_attr_pollrate);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -#define DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD(p, bd)                             \
> >> -     do {                                                    \
> >> -             if (!p)                                         \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -                                                             \
> >> -             bd = dev_get_drvdata(p);                        \
> >> -             if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC)       \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -             if (bd->state != BOARD_READY)                   \
> >> -                     return 0;                               \
> >> -     } while (0)
> >> +static struct dgnc_board *dgnc_get_board(struct device *p)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct dgnc_board *bd;
> >> +
> >> +     if (!p)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +     bd = dev_get_drvdata(p);
> >> +     if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +     if (bd->state != BOARD_READY)
> >> +             return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +     return bd;
> >> +}
> >
> > No, this macro should be removed entirely as what it does is pointless
> > in some parts, wrong in others, and not needed at all in the rest :(
> >
> > I've asked others to fix this up properly in the past, but it doesn't
> > seem like anyone wants to do the work...
> >
> 
> I tried to find the discussion the relevant mails in lkml.org but
> couldn't find them. Could  you point me to them so I can have a look?

Last time I mentioned this, it was on the outreachy-kernel mailing list.

Just walk through the code for yourself and see which, if any, of these
things could ever actually cause the function to "fail".  I think you
will find that none of them can ever happen...

The first test is a huge proof that the original author didn't
understand how sysfs or "container_of()" works, given that it is
impossible to ever have happen.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-14 17:22 [PATCH] staging: dgnc: replace DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD macro Fernando Apesteguia
2016-10-14 17:22 ` Fernando Apesteguia
2016-10-17  8:29 ` Greg KH
2016-10-17  8:29   ` Greg KH
2016-10-17 21:46   ` Fernando Apesteguía
2016-10-17 21:46     ` Fernando Apesteguía
2016-10-18  6:40     ` Greg KH [this message]
2016-10-18  6:40       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161018064018.GB7796@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com \
    --cc=lidza.louina@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.