All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kernel-team@fb.com, axboe@fb.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 11/15] blk-throttle: add interface to configure think time threshold
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:08:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128220818.GA12948@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161124010629.GB4724@ksenks-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

Hello, Shaohua.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:06:30PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be a per-cgroup setting along with latency target?
> > These two are the parameters which define how the cgroup should be
> > treated time-wise.
> 
> It should be easy to make it per-cgroup. Just not sure if it should be
> per-cgroup. The logic is if the disk is faster, wait time should be shorter to
> not harm performance. So it sounds like a per-disk characteristic.

Yes, this is something dependent on the device, but also on the
workload.  For both this parameter and the latency target, it seems
that they should be specified along with the actual device limits so
that they follow the same convention and can be specified per cgroup *
block device.  What do you think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-14 22:22 [PATCH V4 00/15] blk-throttle: add .high limit Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 01/15] blk-throttle: prepare support multiple limits Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 02/15] blk-throttle: add .high interface Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 20:02   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 23:08     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 21:11       ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 03/15] blk-throttle: configure bps/iops limit for cgroup in high limit Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 20:16   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 23:11     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 04/15] blk-throttle: add upgrade logic for LIMIT_HIGH state Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 05/15] blk-throttle: add downgrade logic Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 21:21   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 21:42     ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 23:38       ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 06/15] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isn't too big Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 07/15] blk-throttle: make throtl_slice tunable Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 21:27   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 23:18     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 21:17       ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 08/15] blk-throttle: detect completed idle cgroup Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 09/15] blk-throttle: make bandwidth change smooth Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 21:23   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-24  0:59     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 10/15] blk-throttle: add a simple idle detection Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 21:46   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-24  1:15     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-28 22:21       ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-28 23:10         ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-29 17:08           ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 11/15] blk-throttle: add interface to configure think time threshold Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 21:32   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-24  1:06     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-28 22:08       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-11-28 22:14         ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 12/15] blk-throttle: ignore idle cgroup limit Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 13/15] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 23:40   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-15  3:57   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-29 17:24   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 18:30     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-29 22:36       ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 14/15] blk-throttle: add interface for per-cgroup target latency Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:22 ` [PATCH V4 15/15] blk-throttle: add latency target support Shaohua Li
2016-11-29 17:31   ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 18:14     ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-29 22:54       ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 23:39         ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-14 22:46 ` [PATCH V4 00/15] blk-throttle: add .high limit Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15  0:05   ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-15  0:41     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15  0:49       ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-15  1:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15  1:28           ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-15 19:53             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15 21:31               ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161128220818.GA12948@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.