From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Nils Holland <nholland@tisys.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM: Better, but still there on
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:57:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161223125728.GE23109@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161223121851.GA27413@ppc-nas.fritz.box>
On Fri 23-12-16 13:18:51, Nils Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > TL;DR
> > drop the last patch, check whether memory cgroup is enabled and retest
> > with cgroup_disable=memory to see whether this is memcg related and if
> > it is _not_ then try to test with the patch below
>
> Right, it seems we might be looking in the right direction! So I
> removed the previous patch from my kernel and verified if memory
> cgroup was enabled, and indeed, it was. So I booted with
> cgroup_disable=memory and ran my ordinary test again ... and in fact,
> no ooms!
OK, thanks for confirmation. I could have figured that earlier. The
pagecache differences in such a short time should have raised the red
flag and point towards memcgs...
[...]
> > I would appreciate to stick with your setup to not pull new unknows into
> > the picture.
>
> No problem! It's just likely that I won't be able to test during the
> following days until Dec 27th, but after that I should be back to
> normal and thus be able to run further tests in a timely fashion. :-)
no problem at all. I will try to cook up a patch in the mean time.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Nils Holland <nholland@tisys.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM: Better, but still there on
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:57:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161223125728.GE23109@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161223121851.GA27413@ppc-nas.fritz.box>
On Fri 23-12-16 13:18:51, Nils Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > TL;DR
> > drop the last patch, check whether memory cgroup is enabled and retest
> > with cgroup_disable=memory to see whether this is memcg related and if
> > it is _not_ then try to test with the patch below
>
> Right, it seems we might be looking in the right direction! So I
> removed the previous patch from my kernel and verified if memory
> cgroup was enabled, and indeed, it was. So I booted with
> cgroup_disable=memory and ran my ordinary test again ... and in fact,
> no ooms!
OK, thanks for confirmation. I could have figured that earlier. The
pagecache differences in such a short time should have raised the red
flag and point towards memcgs...
[...]
> > I would appreciate to stick with your setup to not pull new unknows into
> > the picture.
>
> No problem! It's just likely that I won't be able to test during the
> following days until Dec 27th, but after that I should be back to
> normal and thus be able to run further tests in a timely fashion. :-)
no problem at all. I will try to cook up a patch in the mean time.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-23 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 22:57 OOM: Better, but still there on 4.9 Nils Holland
2016-12-16 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` OOM: Better, but still there on Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: consolidate GFP_NOFAIL checks in the allocator slowpath Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, oom: do not enfore OOM killer for __GFP_NOFAIL automatically Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 17:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-12-16 17:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-12-16 22:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 22:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-17 11:17 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-17 11:17 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-18 16:37 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-18 16:37 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 18:47 ` OOM: Better, but still there on Nils Holland
2016-12-16 18:47 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 0:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-17 0:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-17 12:59 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 12:59 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 14:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-17 14:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-17 17:11 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 17:11 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 21:06 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-17 21:06 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-18 5:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-18 5:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-19 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-19 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-20 2:08 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-20 2:08 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-21 7:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 7:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 11:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-21 11:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-21 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 14:04 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-21 14:04 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-22 10:10 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-22 10:10 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-22 10:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 10:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 10:35 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-22 10:35 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-22 10:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-22 10:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-12-22 19:17 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 19:17 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 21:46 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-22 21:46 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-23 10:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 10:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 12:18 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-23 12:18 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-23 12:57 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-12-23 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH] mm, memcg: fix (Re: OOM: Better, but still there on) Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 14:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 22:26 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-23 22:26 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-26 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 18:57 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-26 18:57 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-27 8:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 8:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 11:23 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-27 11:23 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-27 11:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 11:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 15:55 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 15:55 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 16:28 ` [PATCH] mm, vmscan: consider eligible zones in get_scan_count kbuild test robot
2016-12-28 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-28 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH] mm, memcg: fix (Re: OOM: Better, but still there on) Nils Holland
2016-12-27 19:33 ` Nils Holland
2016-12-28 8:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-28 8:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-29 1:20 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 1:20 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-29 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 2:05 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-30 2:05 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-30 10:40 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 10:40 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-29 0:31 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 0:31 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2016-12-29 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-29 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 10:19 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 10:19 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 11:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 11:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 12:43 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 12:43 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-25 22:25 ` [lkp-developer] [mm, memcg] d18e2b2aca: WARNING:at_mm/memcontrol.c:#mem_cgroup_update_lru_size kernel test robot
2016-12-25 22:25 ` kernel test robot
2016-12-26 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-18 0:28 ` OOM: Better, but still there on Xin Zhou
2016-12-16 18:15 ` OOM: Better, but still there on 4.9 Chris Mason
2016-12-16 18:15 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-16 22:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 22:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 22:47 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-16 22:47 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-16 23:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 23:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-16 19:50 ` Chris Mason
2016-12-16 19:50 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161223125728.GE23109@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nholland@tisys.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.