[PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
devices.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows specifying
    *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules as pointed
    by Felx.
    Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
    Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1c82c16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Common IEEE 802.11 properties
+
+This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for all wireless
+devices.
+
+Optional properties:
+ - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz. This can be
+	used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used antennas
+	or power amplifiers.
+
+Example:
+
+pcie@0,0 {
+	reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
+	wifi@0,0 {
+		reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
+		ieee80211-freq-limit = <2402000 2482000>,
+				       <5170000 5250000>;
+	};
+};
-- 
2.10.1

[PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>

This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
devices.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
---
V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows specifying
    *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules as pointed
    by Felx.
    Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
    Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1c82c16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Common IEEE 802.11 properties
+
+This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for all wireless
+devices.
+
+Optional properties:
+ - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz. This can be
+	used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used antennas
+	or power amplifiers.
+
+Example:
+
+pcie@0,0 {
+	reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
+	wifi@0,0 {
+		reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
+		ieee80211-freq-limit = <2402000 2482000>,
+				       <5170000 5250000>;
+	};
+};
-- 
2.10.1

[PATCH V5 2/3] cfg80211: move function checking range fit to util.c

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

It is needed for another cfg80211 helper that will be out of reg.c so
move it to common util.c file and make it non-static.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
V5: Add this patch as suggested by Arend
---
 net/wireless/core.h |  3 +++
 net/wireless/reg.c  | 27 +++++++--------------------
 net/wireless/util.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h
index af6e023..bc8ba6e 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ int cfg80211_change_iface(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 void cfg80211_process_rdev_events(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev);
 void cfg80211_process_wdev_events(struct wireless_dev *wdev);
 
+bool cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
+				u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz);
+
 /**
  * cfg80211_chandef_dfs_usable - checks if chandef is DFS usable
  * @wiphy: the wiphy to validate against
diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
index 5dbac37..753efcd 100644
--- a/net/wireless/reg.c
+++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
@@ -748,21 +748,6 @@ static bool is_valid_rd(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool reg_does_bw_fit(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
-			    u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz)
-{
-	u32 start_freq_khz, end_freq_khz;
-
-	start_freq_khz = center_freq_khz - (bw_khz/2);
-	end_freq_khz = center_freq_khz + (bw_khz/2);
-
-	if (start_freq_khz >= freq_range->start_freq_khz &&
-	    end_freq_khz <= freq_range->end_freq_khz)
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 /**
  * freq_in_rule_band - tells us if a frequency is in a frequency band
  * @freq_range: frequency rule we want to query
@@ -1070,7 +1055,7 @@ freq_reg_info_regd(u32 center_freq,
 		if (!band_rule_found)
 			band_rule_found = freq_in_rule_band(fr, center_freq);
 
-		bw_fits = reg_does_bw_fit(fr, center_freq, bw);
+		bw_fits = cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(fr, center_freq, bw);
 
 		if (band_rule_found && bw_fits)
 			return rr;
@@ -1138,11 +1123,13 @@ static uint32_t reg_rule_to_chan_bw_flags(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd
 		max_bandwidth_khz = reg_get_max_bandwidth(regd, reg_rule);
 
 	/* If we get a reg_rule we can assume that at least 5Mhz fit */
-	if (!reg_does_bw_fit(freq_range, MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
-			     MHZ_TO_KHZ(10)))
+	if (!cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(freq_range,
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(10)))
 		bw_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_10MHZ;
-	if (!reg_does_bw_fit(freq_range, MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
-			     MHZ_TO_KHZ(20)))
+	if (!cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(freq_range,
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(20)))
 		bw_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_20MHZ;
 
 	if (max_bandwidth_khz < MHZ_TO_KHZ(10))
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 2cf7df8..62dc214 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -1847,6 +1847,21 @@ void cfg80211_free_nan_func(struct cfg80211_nan_func *f)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_free_nan_func);
 
+bool cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
+				u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz)
+{
+	u32 start_freq_khz, end_freq_khz;
+
+	start_freq_khz = center_freq_khz - (bw_khz / 2);
+	end_freq_khz = center_freq_khz + (bw_khz / 2);
+
+	if (start_freq_khz >= freq_range->start_freq_khz &&
+	    end_freq_khz <= freq_range->end_freq_khz)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* See IEEE 802.1H for LLC/SNAP encapsulation/decapsulation */
 /* Ethernet-II snap header (RFC1042 for most EtherTypes) */
 const unsigned char rfc1042_header[] __aligned(2) =
-- 
2.10.1

[PATCH V5 2/3] cfg80211: move function checking range fit to util.c

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>

It is needed for another cfg80211 helper that will be out of reg.c so
move it to common util.c file and make it non-static.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
---
V5: Add this patch as suggested by Arend
---
 net/wireless/core.h |  3 +++
 net/wireless/reg.c  | 27 +++++++--------------------
 net/wireless/util.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h
index af6e023..bc8ba6e 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ int cfg80211_change_iface(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 void cfg80211_process_rdev_events(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev);
 void cfg80211_process_wdev_events(struct wireless_dev *wdev);
 
+bool cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
+				u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz);
+
 /**
  * cfg80211_chandef_dfs_usable - checks if chandef is DFS usable
  * @wiphy: the wiphy to validate against
diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
index 5dbac37..753efcd 100644
--- a/net/wireless/reg.c
+++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
@@ -748,21 +748,6 @@ static bool is_valid_rd(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool reg_does_bw_fit(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
-			    u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz)
-{
-	u32 start_freq_khz, end_freq_khz;
-
-	start_freq_khz = center_freq_khz - (bw_khz/2);
-	end_freq_khz = center_freq_khz + (bw_khz/2);
-
-	if (start_freq_khz >= freq_range->start_freq_khz &&
-	    end_freq_khz <= freq_range->end_freq_khz)
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 /**
  * freq_in_rule_band - tells us if a frequency is in a frequency band
  * @freq_range: frequency rule we want to query
@@ -1070,7 +1055,7 @@ freq_reg_info_regd(u32 center_freq,
 		if (!band_rule_found)
 			band_rule_found = freq_in_rule_band(fr, center_freq);
 
-		bw_fits = reg_does_bw_fit(fr, center_freq, bw);
+		bw_fits = cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(fr, center_freq, bw);
 
 		if (band_rule_found && bw_fits)
 			return rr;
@@ -1138,11 +1123,13 @@ static uint32_t reg_rule_to_chan_bw_flags(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd
 		max_bandwidth_khz = reg_get_max_bandwidth(regd, reg_rule);
 
 	/* If we get a reg_rule we can assume that at least 5Mhz fit */
-	if (!reg_does_bw_fit(freq_range, MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
-			     MHZ_TO_KHZ(10)))
+	if (!cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(freq_range,
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(10)))
 		bw_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_10MHZ;
-	if (!reg_does_bw_fit(freq_range, MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
-			     MHZ_TO_KHZ(20)))
+	if (!cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(freq_range,
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					MHZ_TO_KHZ(20)))
 		bw_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_20MHZ;
 
 	if (max_bandwidth_khz < MHZ_TO_KHZ(10))
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 2cf7df8..62dc214 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -1847,6 +1847,21 @@ void cfg80211_free_nan_func(struct cfg80211_nan_func *f)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_free_nan_func);
 
+bool cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
+				u32 center_freq_khz, u32 bw_khz)
+{
+	u32 start_freq_khz, end_freq_khz;
+
+	start_freq_khz = center_freq_khz - (bw_khz / 2);
+	end_freq_khz = center_freq_khz + (bw_khz / 2);
+
+	if (start_freq_khz >= freq_range->start_freq_khz &&
+	    end_freq_khz <= freq_range->end_freq_khz)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* See IEEE 802.1H for LLC/SNAP encapsulation/decapsulation */
 /* Ethernet-II snap header (RFC1042 for most EtherTypes) */
 const unsigned char rfc1042_header[] __aligned(2) =
-- 
2.10.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

This patch adds a helper for reading that new property and applying
limitations or supported channels specified this way.
It may be useful for specifying single band devices or devices that
support only some part of the whole band. It's common that tri-band
routers have separated radios for lower and higher part of 5 GHz band.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
V2: Put main code in core.c as it isn't strictly part of regulatory - pointed
    by Arend.
    Update to support ieee80211-freq-limit (new property).
V3: Introduce separated wiphy_read_of_freq_limits function.
    Add extra sanity checks for DT data.
    Move code back to reg.c as suggested by Johannes.
V4: Move code to of.c
    Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
    Modify orig_flags
V5: Make wiphy_read_of_freq_limits return void as there isn't much point of
    handling errors.
---
 include/net/cfg80211.h |  25 +++++++++
 net/wireless/Makefile  |   1 +
 net/wireless/of.c      | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 net/wireless/of.c

diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index ca2ac1c..a58cdc9 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -311,6 +311,31 @@ struct ieee80211_supported_band {
 	struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap vht_cap;
 };
 
+/**
+ * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device tree
+ *
+ * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
+ *
+ * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may be useful
+ * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due to board
+ * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
+ *
+ * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels (disable
+ * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers with
+ * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
+ *
+ * As this function access device node it has to be called after set_wiphy_dev.
+ * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy);
+#else /* CONFIG_OF */
+static inline void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+{
+}
+#endif /* !CONFIG_OF */
+
+
 /*
  * Wireless hardware/device configuration structures and methods
  */
diff --git a/net/wireless/Makefile b/net/wireless/Makefile
index 4c9e39f..95b4c09 100644
--- a/net/wireless/Makefile
+++ b/net/wireless/Makefile
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_WEXT_PRIV) += wext-priv.o
 
 cfg80211-y += core.o sysfs.o radiotap.o util.o reg.o scan.o nl80211.o
 cfg80211-y += mlme.o ibss.o sme.o chan.o ethtool.o mesh.o ap.o trace.o ocb.o
+cfg80211-$(CONFIG_OF) += of.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_DEBUGFS) += debugfs.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_WEXT) += wext-compat.o wext-sme.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB) += regdb.o
diff --git a/net/wireless/of.c b/net/wireless/of.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..70b21e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/wireless/of.c
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
+ *
+ * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
+ * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
+ * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
+ * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
+ * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
+ * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
+ * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
+ * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include "core.h"
+
+static bool wiphy_freq_limits_valid_chan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+					 struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits,
+					 unsigned int n_freq_limits,
+					 struct ieee80211_channel *chan)
+{
+	u32 bw = MHZ_TO_KHZ(20);
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n_freq_limits; i++) {
+		struct ieee80211_freq_range *limit = &freq_limits[i];
+
+		if (cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(limit,
+					       MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					       bw))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void wiphy_freq_limits_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+				    struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits,
+				    unsigned int n_freq_limits)
+{
+	enum nl80211_band band;
+	int i;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!n_freq_limits))
+		return;
+
+	for (band = 0; band < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; band++) {
+		struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband = wiphy->bands[band];
+
+		if (!sband)
+			continue;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < sband->n_channels; i++) {
+			struct ieee80211_channel *chan = &sband->channels[i];
+
+			if (chan->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
+				continue;
+
+			if (!wiphy_freq_limits_valid_chan(wiphy, freq_limits,
+							  n_freq_limits,
+							  chan)) {
+				pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as it's out of OF limits\n",
+					 chan->center_freq);
+				chan->orig_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+{
+	struct device *dev = wiphy_dev(wiphy);
+	struct device_node *np;
+	struct property *prop;
+	struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits;
+	unsigned int n_freq_limits;
+	const __be32 *p;
+	int len, i;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	if (!dev)
+		return;
+	np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	if (!np)
+		return;
+
+	prop = of_find_property(np, "ieee80211-freq-limit", &len);
+	if (!prop)
+		return;
+
+	if (!len || len % sizeof(u32) || len / sizeof(u32) % 2) {
+		dev_err(dev, "ieee80211-freq-limit wrong format");
+		return;
+	}
+	n_freq_limits = len / sizeof(u32) / 2;
+
+	freq_limits = kcalloc(n_freq_limits, sizeof(*freq_limits), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!freq_limits) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_kfree;
+	}
+
+	p = NULL;
+	for (i = 0; i < n_freq_limits; i++) {
+		struct ieee80211_freq_range *limit = &freq_limits[i];
+
+		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &limit->start_freq_khz);
+		if (!p) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+
+		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &limit->end_freq_khz);
+		if (!p) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+
+		if (!limit->start_freq_khz ||
+		    !limit->end_freq_khz ||
+		    limit->start_freq_khz >= limit->end_freq_khz) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+	}
+
+	wiphy_freq_limits_apply(wiphy, freq_limits, n_freq_limits);
+
+out_kfree:
+	kfree(freq_limits);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get limits: %d\n", err);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wiphy_read_of_freq_limits);
-- 
2.10.1

[PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>

This patch adds a helper for reading that new property and applying
limitations or supported channels specified this way.
It may be useful for specifying single band devices or devices that
support only some part of the whole band. It's common that tri-band
routers have separated radios for lower and higher part of 5 GHz band.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
---
V2: Put main code in core.c as it isn't strictly part of regulatory - pointed
    by Arend.
    Update to support ieee80211-freq-limit (new property).
V3: Introduce separated wiphy_read_of_freq_limits function.
    Add extra sanity checks for DT data.
    Move code back to reg.c as suggested by Johannes.
V4: Move code to of.c
    Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
    Modify orig_flags
V5: Make wiphy_read_of_freq_limits return void as there isn't much point of
    handling errors.
---
 include/net/cfg80211.h |  25 +++++++++
 net/wireless/Makefile  |   1 +
 net/wireless/of.c      | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 net/wireless/of.c

diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index ca2ac1c..a58cdc9 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -311,6 +311,31 @@ struct ieee80211_supported_band {
 	struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap vht_cap;
 };
 
+/**
+ * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device tree
+ *
+ * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
+ *
+ * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may be useful
+ * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due to board
+ * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
+ *
+ * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels (disable
+ * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers with
+ * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
+ *
+ * As this function access device node it has to be called after set_wiphy_dev.
+ * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy);
+#else /* CONFIG_OF */
+static inline void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+{
+}
+#endif /* !CONFIG_OF */
+
+
 /*
  * Wireless hardware/device configuration structures and methods
  */
diff --git a/net/wireless/Makefile b/net/wireless/Makefile
index 4c9e39f..95b4c09 100644
--- a/net/wireless/Makefile
+++ b/net/wireless/Makefile
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_WEXT_PRIV) += wext-priv.o
 
 cfg80211-y += core.o sysfs.o radiotap.o util.o reg.o scan.o nl80211.o
 cfg80211-y += mlme.o ibss.o sme.o chan.o ethtool.o mesh.o ap.o trace.o ocb.o
+cfg80211-$(CONFIG_OF) += of.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_DEBUGFS) += debugfs.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_WEXT) += wext-compat.o wext-sme.o
 cfg80211-$(CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB) += regdb.o
diff --git a/net/wireless/of.c b/net/wireless/of.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..70b21e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/wireless/of.c
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
+ *
+ * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
+ * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
+ * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
+ * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
+ * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
+ * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
+ * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
+ * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include "core.h"
+
+static bool wiphy_freq_limits_valid_chan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+					 struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits,
+					 unsigned int n_freq_limits,
+					 struct ieee80211_channel *chan)
+{
+	u32 bw = MHZ_TO_KHZ(20);
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n_freq_limits; i++) {
+		struct ieee80211_freq_range *limit = &freq_limits[i];
+
+		if (cfg80211_does_bw_fit_range(limit,
+					       MHZ_TO_KHZ(chan->center_freq),
+					       bw))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void wiphy_freq_limits_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+				    struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits,
+				    unsigned int n_freq_limits)
+{
+	enum nl80211_band band;
+	int i;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!n_freq_limits))
+		return;
+
+	for (band = 0; band < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; band++) {
+		struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband = wiphy->bands[band];
+
+		if (!sband)
+			continue;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < sband->n_channels; i++) {
+			struct ieee80211_channel *chan = &sband->channels[i];
+
+			if (chan->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
+				continue;
+
+			if (!wiphy_freq_limits_valid_chan(wiphy, freq_limits,
+							  n_freq_limits,
+							  chan)) {
+				pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as it's out of OF limits\n",
+					 chan->center_freq);
+				chan->orig_flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+void wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+{
+	struct device *dev = wiphy_dev(wiphy);
+	struct device_node *np;
+	struct property *prop;
+	struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_limits;
+	unsigned int n_freq_limits;
+	const __be32 *p;
+	int len, i;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	if (!dev)
+		return;
+	np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	if (!np)
+		return;
+
+	prop = of_find_property(np, "ieee80211-freq-limit", &len);
+	if (!prop)
+		return;
+
+	if (!len || len % sizeof(u32) || len / sizeof(u32) % 2) {
+		dev_err(dev, "ieee80211-freq-limit wrong format");
+		return;
+	}
+	n_freq_limits = len / sizeof(u32) / 2;
+
+	freq_limits = kcalloc(n_freq_limits, sizeof(*freq_limits), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!freq_limits) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_kfree;
+	}
+
+	p = NULL;
+	for (i = 0; i < n_freq_limits; i++) {
+		struct ieee80211_freq_range *limit = &freq_limits[i];
+
+		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &limit->start_freq_khz);
+		if (!p) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+
+		p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &limit->end_freq_khz);
+		if (!p) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+
+		if (!limit->start_freq_khz ||
+		    !limit->end_freq_khz ||
+		    limit->start_freq_khz >= limit->end_freq_khz) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_kfree;
+		}
+	}
+
+	wiphy_freq_limits_apply(wiphy, freq_limits, n_freq_limits);
+
+out_kfree:
+	kfree(freq_limits);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get limits: %d\n", err);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wiphy_read_of_freq_limits);
-- 
2.10.1

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Johannes Berg]

> V4: Move code to of.c
>     Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
>     Modify orig_flags


> +/**
> + * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device
> tree
> + *
> + * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
> + *
> + * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may
> be useful
> + * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due
> to board
> + * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
> + *
> + * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels
> (disable
> + * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers
> with
> + * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
> + *
> + * As this function access device node it has to be called after
> set_wiphy_dev.
> + * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
> + */

It should also be called before wiphy_register(), I think? And I
suppose you should add a comment about not being able to use shared
channels.

> +				pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as
> it's out of OF limits\n",
> +					 chan->center_freq);
> +				chan->orig_flags |=
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
> 
But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be overwritten
again by wiphy_register(), no?

johannes

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Johannes Berg]

> V4: Move code to of.c
>     Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
>     Modify orig_flags


> +/**
> + * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device
> tree
> + *
> + * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
> + *
> + * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may
> be useful
> + * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due
> to board
> + * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
> + *
> + * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels
> (disable
> + * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers
> with
> + * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
> + *
> + * As this function access device node it has to be called after
> set_wiphy_dev.
> + * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
> + */

It should also be called before wiphy_register(), I think? And I
suppose you should add a comment about not being able to use shared
channels.

> +				pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as
> it's out of OF limits\n",
> +					 chan->center_freq);
> +				chan->orig_flags |=
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
> 
But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be overwritten
again by wiphy_register(), no?

johannes

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 4 January 2017 at 14:26, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote=
:
>
>> V4: Move code to of.c
>>     Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
>>     Modify orig_flags
>
>
>> +/**
>> + * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device
>> tree
>> + *
>> + * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
>> + *
>> + * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may
>> be useful
>> + * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due
>> to board
>> + * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
>> + *
>> + * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels
>> (disable
>> + * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers
>> with
>> + * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
>> + *
>> + * As this function access device node it has to be called after
>> set_wiphy_dev.
>> + * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
>> + */
>
> It should also be called before wiphy_register(), I think? And I
> suppose you should add a comment about not being able to use shared
> channels.
>
>> +                             pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as
>> it's out of OF limits\n",
>> +                                      chan->center_freq);
>> +                             chan->orig_flags |=3D
>> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
>>
> But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be overwritten
> again by wiphy_register(), no?

I told you I successfully tested it, didn't I? Well, I quickly checked
wiphy_register and couldn't understand how it was possible it worked
for me...

OK, so after some debugging I understood why I got this working. It's
the way brcmfmac handles channels.

At the beginning all channels are disabled: see __wl_2ghz_channels &
__wl_5ghz_channels. They have IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set in "flags"
for every channel.

In early phase brcmfmac calls wiphy_read_of_freq_limits which sets
IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in "orig_flags" for unavailable channels.

Then brcmf_construct_chaninfo kicks in. Normally it removes
IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED from "flags" for most of channels, but it
doesn't happen anymore due to my change:
if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
        continue;

Then brcmfmac calls wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory which sets some bits
like IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ and IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_160MHZ in "flags".

Finally wiphy_register is called which copies "flags" to
"original_flags". As brcmfmac /respected/ IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set
in orig_flags, it also left IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in flags. This way
I got IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags after overwriting that
field inside wiphy_register.

That's quite crazy, right?

I guess you're right after all, I should set IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED
in "flags" field, let wiphy_register copy that to "orig_flags" and
sanitize brcmfmac.

--=20
Rafa=C5=82

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 4 January 2017 at 14:26, Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> V4: Move code to of.c
>>     Use one helper called at init time (no runtime hooks)
>>     Modify orig_flags
>
>
>> +/**
>> + * wiphy_read_of_freq_limits - read frequency limits from device
>> tree
>> + *
>> + * @wiphy: the wireless device to get extra limits for
>> + *
>> + * Some devices may have extra limitations specified in DT. This may
>> be useful
>> + * for chipsets that normally support more bands but are limited due
>> to board
>> + * design (e.g. by antennas or extermal power amplifier).
>> + *
>> + * This function reads info from DT and uses it to *modify* channels
>> (disable
>> + * unavailable ones). It's usually a *bad* idea to use it in drivers
>> with
>> + * shared channel data as DT limitations are device specific.
>> + *
>> + * As this function access device node it has to be called after
>> set_wiphy_dev.
>> + * It also modifies channels so they have to be set first.
>> + */
>
> It should also be called before wiphy_register(), I think? And I
> suppose you should add a comment about not being able to use shared
> channels.
>
>> +                             pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as
>> it's out of OF limits\n",
>> +                                      chan->center_freq);
>> +                             chan->orig_flags |=
>> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
>>
> But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be overwritten
> again by wiphy_register(), no?

I told you I successfully tested it, didn't I? Well, I quickly checked
wiphy_register and couldn't understand how it was possible it worked
for me...

OK, so after some debugging I understood why I got this working. It's
the way brcmfmac handles channels.

At the beginning all channels are disabled: see __wl_2ghz_channels &
__wl_5ghz_channels. They have IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set in "flags"
for every channel.

In early phase brcmfmac calls wiphy_read_of_freq_limits which sets
IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in "orig_flags" for unavailable channels.

Then brcmf_construct_chaninfo kicks in. Normally it removes
IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED from "flags" for most of channels, but it
doesn't happen anymore due to my change:
if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
        continue;

Then brcmfmac calls wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory which sets some bits
like IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ and IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_160MHZ in "flags".

Finally wiphy_register is called which copies "flags" to
"original_flags". As brcmfmac /respected/ IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set
in orig_flags, it also left IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in flags. This way
I got IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags after overwriting that
field inside wiphy_register.

That's quite crazy, right?

I guess you're right after all, I should set IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED
in "flags" field, let wiphy_register copy that to "orig_flags" and
sanitize brcmfmac.

-- 
Rafał

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Johannes Berg]

> > But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be
> > overwritten again by wiphy_register(), no?
> 
> I told you I successfully tested it, didn't I? Well, I quickly
> checked wiphy_register and couldn't understand how it was possible it
> worked for me...

I guess I didn't believe it ;-)

> OK, so after some debugging I understood why I got this working. It's
> the way brcmfmac handles channels.
> 
> At the beginning all channels are disabled: see __wl_2ghz_channels &
> __wl_5ghz_channels. They have IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set in "flags"
> for every channel.
> 
> In early phase brcmfmac calls wiphy_read_of_freq_limits which sets
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in "orig_flags" for unavailable channels.
> 
> Then brcmf_construct_chaninfo kicks in. Normally it removes
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED from "flags" for most of channels, but it
> doesn't happen anymore due to my change:
> if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
>         continue;
> 
> Then brcmfmac calls wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory which sets some
> bits like IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ and IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_160MHZ in
> "flags".
> 
> Finally wiphy_register is called which copies "flags" to
> "original_flags". As brcmfmac /respected/ IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set
> in orig_flags, it also left IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in flags. This
> way I got IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags after overwriting
> that field inside wiphy_register.
> 
> That's quite crazy, right?

Yeah, that was pretty crazy.

> I guess you're right after all, I should set IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED
> in "flags" field, let wiphy_register copy that to "orig_flags" and
> sanitize brcmfmac.

Makes sense to me. That would also match the way it works when no
custom regulatory notifier is used, which makes the OF function more
widely applicable.

Thanks,
johannes

Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property

[Johannes Berg]

> > But just setting orig_flags also won't work, since it'd be
> > overwritten again by wiphy_register(), no?
> 
> I told you I successfully tested it, didn't I? Well, I quickly
> checked wiphy_register and couldn't understand how it was possible it
> worked for me...

I guess I didn't believe it ;-)

> OK, so after some debugging I understood why I got this working. It's
> the way brcmfmac handles channels.
> 
> At the beginning all channels are disabled: see __wl_2ghz_channels &
> __wl_5ghz_channels. They have IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set in "flags"
> for every channel.
> 
> In early phase brcmfmac calls wiphy_read_of_freq_limits which sets
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in "orig_flags" for unavailable channels.
> 
> Then brcmf_construct_chaninfo kicks in. Normally it removes
> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED from "flags" for most of channels, but it
> doesn't happen anymore due to my change:
> if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
>         continue;
> 
> Then brcmfmac calls wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory which sets some
> bits like IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ and IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_160MHZ in
> "flags".
> 
> Finally wiphy_register is called which copies "flags" to
> "original_flags". As brcmfmac /respected/ IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED set
> in orig_flags, it also left IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in flags. This
> way I got IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags after overwriting
> that field inside wiphy_register.
> 
> That's quite crazy, right?

Yeah, that was pretty crazy.

> I guess you're right after all, I should set IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED
> in "flags" field, let wiphy_register copy that to "orig_flags" and
> sanitize brcmfmac.

Makes sense to me. That would also match the way it works when no
custom regulatory notifier is used, which makes the OF function more
widely applicable.

Thanks,
johannes

[PATCH V5 4/3] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to respect extra limits

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

There are some devices (e.g. Netgear R8000 home router) with one chipset
model used for different radios, some of them limited to subbands. NVRAM
entries don't contain any extra info on such limitations and firmware
reports full list of channels to us. We need to store extra limitation
info on DT to support such devices properly.

Now there is a cfg80211 helper for reading such info use it in brcmfmac.
This patch adds check for channel being disabled with orig_flags which
is how this wiphy helper works.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
This patch should probably go through wireless-driver-next which is why
it got weird number 4/3. I'm sending it just as a proof of concept.
It was succesfully tested on SmartRG SR400ac with BCM43602.

V4: Respect IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags
V5: Update commit message
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
index ccae3bb..f95e316 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -5886,6 +5886,9 @@ static int brcmf_construct_chaninfo(struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg,
 						       band->band);
 		channel[index].hw_value = ch.control_ch_num;
 
+		if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
+			continue;
+
 		/* assuming the chanspecs order is HT20,
 		 * HT40 upper, HT40 lower, and VHT80.
 		 */
@@ -6477,6 +6480,7 @@ static int brcmf_setup_wiphy(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
 			wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] = band;
 		}
 	}
+	wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(wiphy);
 	err = brcmf_setup_wiphybands(wiphy);
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.10.1

[PATCH V5 4/3] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to respect extra limits

[Rafał Miłecki]

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>

There are some devices (e.g. Netgear R8000 home router) with one chipset
model used for different radios, some of them limited to subbands. NVRAM
entries don't contain any extra info on such limitations and firmware
reports full list of channels to us. We need to store extra limitation
info on DT to support such devices properly.

Now there is a cfg80211 helper for reading such info use it in brcmfmac.
This patch adds check for channel being disabled with orig_flags which
is how this wiphy helper works.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
---
This patch should probably go through wireless-driver-next which is why
it got weird number 4/3. I'm sending it just as a proof of concept.
It was succesfully tested on SmartRG SR400ac with BCM43602.

V4: Respect IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED in orig_flags
V5: Update commit message
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
index ccae3bb..f95e316 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -5886,6 +5886,9 @@ static int brcmf_construct_chaninfo(struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg,
 						       band->band);
 		channel[index].hw_value = ch.control_ch_num;
 
+		if (channel->orig_flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
+			continue;
+
 		/* assuming the chanspecs order is HT20,
 		 * HT40 upper, HT40 lower, and VHT80.
 		 */
@@ -6477,6 +6480,7 @@ static int brcmf_setup_wiphy(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
 			wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] = band;
 		}
 	}
+	wiphy_read_of_freq_limits(wiphy);
 	err = brcmf_setup_wiphybands(wiphy);
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.10.1

Re: [PATCH V5 4/3] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to respect extra limits

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 11:57:15PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> There are some devices (e.g. Netgear R8000 home router) with one chipset
> model used for different radios, some of them limited to subbands. NVRAM
> entries don't contain any extra info on such limitations and firmware
> reports full list of channels to us. We need to store extra limitation
> info on DT to support such devices properly.

This is the type of explanation that I'm looking for in the DT patch as 
well as the examples of where this data comes from now. Certainly, I 
think having per platform settings in userspace is not what you want.

Rob

Re: [PATCH V5 4/3] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to respect extra limits

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 11:57:15PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
> 
> There are some devices (e.g. Netgear R8000 home router) with one chipset
> model used for different radios, some of them limited to subbands. NVRAM
> entries don't contain any extra info on such limitations and firmware
> reports full list of channels to us. We need to store extra limitation
> info on DT to support such devices properly.

This is the type of explanation that I'm looking for in the DT patch as 
well as the examples of where this data comes from now. Certainly, I 
think having per platform settings in userspace is not what you want.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Rafał Miłecki]

Hi Rob,

On 01/03/2017 11:57 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows specifying
>     *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules as pointed
>     by Felx.
>     Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
>     Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
> V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
> V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1c82c16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +Common IEEE 802.11 properties
> +
> +This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for all wireless
> +devices.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> + - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz. This can be
> +	used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used antennas
> +	or power amplifiers.

Do you find this description sufficient now? I'm not sure how/if I could answer
"Where would this data normally come from?" question.

One vendor may hardcode choice of channels in their PHP web UI.
Another one may do it in Andoid app.
OpenWrt so far was describing this limitation on their wiki page.

It doesn't sound like any valuable info if I understand this correctly. We also
don't describe where to get information about amount o RAM. One may just check
the hardware, one may use vendor firmware, one could check product data sheet.

If I missed the point, could you help me get this?


> +Example:
> +
> +pcie@0,0 {
> +	reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
> +	wifi@0,0 {
> +		reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
> +		ieee80211-freq-limit = <2402000 2482000>,
> +				       <5170000 5250000>;
> +	};
> +};
>

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Rafał Miłecki]

Hi Rob,

On 01/03/2017 11:57 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
>
> This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows specifying
>     *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules as pointed
>     by Felx.
>     Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
>     Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
> V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
> V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1c82c16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +Common IEEE 802.11 properties
> +
> +This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for all wireless
> +devices.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> + - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz. This can be
> +	used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used antennas
> +	or power amplifiers.

Do you find this description sufficient now? I'm not sure how/if I could answer
"Where would this data normally come from?" question.

One vendor may hardcode choice of channels in their PHP web UI.
Another one may do it in Andoid app.
OpenWrt so far was describing this limitation on their wiki page.

It doesn't sound like any valuable info if I understand this correctly. We also
don't describe where to get information about amount o RAM. One may just check
the hardware, one may use vendor firmware, one could check product data sheet.

If I missed the point, could you help me get this?


> +Example:
> +
> +pcie@0,0 {
> +	reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
> +	wifi@0,0 {
> +		reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
> +		ieee80211-freq-limit = <2402000 2482000>,
> +				       <5170000 5250000>;
> +	};
> +};
>

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Arend Van Spriel]

On 4-1-2017 7:20, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 01/03/2017 11:57 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>> ---
>> V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows
>> specifying
>>     *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules
>> as pointed
>>     by Felx.
>>     Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
>>     Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
>> V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
>> V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1c82c16
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +Common IEEE 802.11 properties
>> +
>> +This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for
>> all wireless
>> +devices.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> + - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz.
>> This can be
>> +    used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used
>> antennas
>> +    or power amplifiers.
> 
> Do you find this description sufficient now? I'm not sure how/if I could
> answer
> "Where would this data normally come from?" question.
>
> One vendor may hardcode choice of channels in their PHP web UI.
> Another one may do it in Andoid app.
> OpenWrt so far was describing this limitation on their wiki page.
> 
> It doesn't sound like any valuable info if I understand this correctly.
> We also
> don't describe where to get information about amount o RAM. One may just
> check
> the hardware, one may use vendor firmware, one could check product data
> sheet.
> 
> If I missed the point, could you help me get this?


There is probably no easy answer. DT is used to describe device
properties that are not otherwise discoverable (at least that is my rule
of thumb). So what is the "device" in this context? You may consider
just the chip, but in this case it is combination of the chip and its RF
path that determine the frequency range that it can operate in.
Apparently this was assured in user-space due to lack of a better
option. Having this specified in DT seems a viable option getting rid of
having a particular platform impose a requirement upon user-space.

You could consider these properties global as they are describing the
platform, but again this depends on what you consider the "device". If
you want to do this global you may add a global node for wifi properties
and use references to the device.

Regards,
Arend

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property

[Arend Van Spriel]

On 4-1-2017 7:20, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 01/03/2017 11:57 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> This new file should be used for properties that apply to all wireless
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> V2: Switch to a single ieee80211-freq-limit property that allows
>> specifying
>>     *multiple* ranges. This resolves problem with more complex rules
>> as pointed
>>     by Felx.
>>     Make description implementation agnostic as pointed by Arend.
>>     Rename node to wifi as suggested by Martin.
>> V3: Use more real-life frequencies in the example.
>> V5: Describe hardware design as possible use for this property
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt   | 20
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1c82c16
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +Common IEEE 802.11 properties
>> +
>> +This provides documentation of common properties that are valid for
>> all wireless
>> +devices.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> + - ieee80211-freq-limit : list of supported frequency ranges in KHz.
>> This can be
>> +    used to specify extra hardware limitations caused by e.g. used
>> antennas
>> +    or power amplifiers.
> 
> Do you find this description sufficient now? I'm not sure how/if I could
> answer
> "Where would this data normally come from?" question.
>
> One vendor may hardcode choice of channels in their PHP web UI.
> Another one may do it in Andoid app.
> OpenWrt so far was describing this limitation on their wiki page.
> 
> It doesn't sound like any valuable info if I understand this correctly.
> We also
> don't describe where to get information about amount o RAM. One may just
> check
> the hardware, one may use vendor firmware, one could check product data
> sheet.
> 
> If I missed the point, could you help me get this?


There is probably no easy answer. DT is used to describe device
properties that are not otherwise discoverable (at least that is my rule
of thumb). So what is the "device" in this context? You may consider
just the chip, but in this case it is combination of the chip and its RF
path that determine the frequency range that it can operate in.
Apparently this was assured in user-space due to lack of a better
option. Having this specified in DT seems a viable option getting rid of
having a particular platform impose a requirement upon user-space.

You could consider these properties global as they are describing the
platform, but again this depends on what you consider the "device". If
you want to do this global you may add a global node for wifi properties
and use references to the device.

Regards,
Arend