* Is PWM subsystem maintainable?
@ 2017-01-16 14:50 Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-16 21:58 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-01-16 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-pwm; +Cc: Thierry Reding, Linus Torvalds, Mika Westerberg
Hi!
I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he responsive?
We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?
2017-01-16 14:50 Is PWM subsystem maintainable? Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-01-16 21:58 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-16 22:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2017-01-16 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pwm, Linus Torvalds, Mika Westerberg
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he
> responsive?
Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December
and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like.
> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
>
> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.
I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just
need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push.
"Uncountable" is maybe a little strong, though.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?
2017-01-16 21:58 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2017-01-16 22:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-01-16 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pwm, Linus Torvalds, Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he
>> responsive?
>
> Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December
> and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like.
Good you are here!
>> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
>> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
>> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
>>
>> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
>> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.
>
> I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just
> need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push.
Thanks! It's indeed important to us.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-16 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-16 14:50 Is PWM subsystem maintainable? Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-16 21:58 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-16 22:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.