All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, rafal@milecki.pl, xow@google.com,
	joel@jms.id.au, jon.mason@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pgynther@google.com, jaedon.shin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: phy: bcm7xxx: add support for 28nm EPHY
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:06:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314010651.GO15842@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314004142.4746-3-opendmb@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:41:32PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_01_afe_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Set current trim values INT_trim = -1, Ext_trim =0 */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_BIAS_TRIM, 0x3BE0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Cal reset */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_TL4);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

Hi Doug

It would be nice to have a few blank lines here and there...

> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_TL4_RST_MSK, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Cal reset disable */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_TL4);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

... just to break things up into readable chunks.

> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			       0, MII_BCM7XXX_TL4_RST_MSK);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +reset_shadow_mode:
> +	/* reset shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

How about:

	return phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
	       		        MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);

> +/* The 28nm EPHY does not support Clause 45 (MMD) used by bcm-phy-lib */
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_apd_enable(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 1 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Enable auto-power down */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_SHDW_AUXSTAT2,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_SHDW_AS2_APDE, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* reset shadow mode 1 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

How about just

    return phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST, 0,
    	   		       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE);


> +}
> +
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_eee_enable(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Advertise supported modes */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_AN_EEE_ADV);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

blank...

> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MDIO_EEE_100TX);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Restore Defaults */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_PCS_CTRL_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_PCS_CTRL_2_DEF);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_EEE_THRESH);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_EEE_THRESH_DEF);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Enable EEE autonegotiation */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_AN_STAT);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			(MII_BCM7XXX_AN_NULL_MSG_EN | MII_BCM7XXX_AN_EEE_EN));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +reset_shadow_mode:
> +	/* reset shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Restart autoneg */
> +	phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR,
> +		  (BMCR_SPEED100 | BMCR_ANENABLE | BMCR_ANRESTART));
> +
> +	return 0;

  return phy_write(.....); ?

> +}

  Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
To: Doug Berger <opendmb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org,
	rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org,
	xow-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	joel-U3u1mxZcP9KHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org,
	jon.mason-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	pgynther-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	jaedon.shin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: phy: bcm7xxx: add support for 28nm EPHY
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:06:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314010651.GO15842@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314004142.4746-3-opendmb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:41:32PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_01_afe_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Set current trim values INT_trim = -1, Ext_trim =0 */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_BIAS_TRIM, 0x3BE0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Cal reset */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_TL4);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

Hi Doug

It would be nice to have a few blank lines here and there...

> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_TL4_RST_MSK, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Cal reset disable */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_TL4);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

... just to break things up into readable chunks.

> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			       0, MII_BCM7XXX_TL4_RST_MSK);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +reset_shadow_mode:
> +	/* reset shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

How about:

	return phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
	       		        MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);

> +/* The 28nm EPHY does not support Clause 45 (MMD) used by bcm-phy-lib */
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_apd_enable(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 1 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Enable auto-power down */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_SHDW_AUXSTAT2,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_SHDW_AS2_APDE, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* reset shadow mode 1 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

How about just

    return phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BRCM_FET_BRCMTEST, 0,
    	   		       MII_BRCM_FET_BT_SRE);


> +}
> +
> +static int bcm7xxx_28nm_ephy_eee_enable(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* set shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Advertise supported modes */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_AN_EEE_ADV);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;

blank...

> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MDIO_EEE_100TX);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Restore Defaults */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_PCS_CTRL_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_PCS_CTRL_2_DEF);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_EEE_THRESH);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_EEE_THRESH_DEF);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +	/* Enable EEE autonegotiation */
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_ADDR_CTRL,
> +			MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_3_AN_STAT);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +	ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_2_CTRL_STAT,
> +			(MII_BCM7XXX_AN_NULL_MSG_EN | MII_BCM7XXX_AN_EEE_EN));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto reset_shadow_mode;
> +
> +reset_shadow_mode:
> +	/* reset shadow mode 2 */
> +	ret = phy_set_clr_bits(phydev, MII_BCM7XXX_TEST, 0,
> +			       MII_BCM7XXX_SHD_MODE_2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Restart autoneg */
> +	phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR,
> +		  (BMCR_SPEED100 | BMCR_ANENABLE | BMCR_ANRESTART));
> +
> +	return 0;

  return phy_write(.....); ?

> +}

  Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  0:41 [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: bcmgenet: add support for GENETv5 Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:41 ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] net: phy: bcm-phylib: replace obsolete EEE macro references Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:49   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:49     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: phy: bcm7xxx: add support for 28nm EPHY Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:50   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:50     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  1:06   ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2017-03-14  1:06     ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-14  2:06     ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14  2:43       ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-14  2:43         ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-14 17:23         ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14 17:23           ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net: bcmgenet: simplify circular pointer arithmetic Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] net: bcmgenet: remove meaningless lines Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:55   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:55     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] net: bcmgenet: manage dma interrupts in napi code Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:55   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: bcmgenet: remove handling of wol interrupts from isr0 Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:41   ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:56     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] net: bcmgenet: clear status to reduce spurious interrupts Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:56     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: bcmgenet: correct return value of __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:57   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] net: bcmgenet: return EOPNOTSUPP for unknown ioctl commands Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:57   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14 11:04   ` David Laight
2017-03-14 17:31     ` Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] dt-bindings: net: document bcmgenet WoL interrupt Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:58   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:58     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-20 22:09   ` Rob Herring
2017-03-20 22:09     ` Rob Herring
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] dt-bindings: net: update bcmgenet binding for GENETv5 Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:58   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: bcmgenet: add support for the GENETv5 hardware Doug Berger
2017-03-14  0:59   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  0:59     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-03-14  4:53 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: bcmgenet: add support for GENETv5 David Miller
2017-03-14  4:53   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314010651.GO15842@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaedon.shin@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=jon.mason@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
    --cc=pgynther@google.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=xow@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.