All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	rkrcmar-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org,
	catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
	lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org,
	robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	lv.zheng-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	nkaje-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	eun.taik.lee-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	shijie.huang-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	rruigrok-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	paul.gortmaker-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
	tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	bristot-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 spec adds a new version of the generic data structure.

which data structure? HEST?

> Add support to handle the new structure as well as properly verify
> and iterate through the generic data entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

This is clearly a new version of the patch so Reviewed-by tags don't
apply anymore. Ditto for the next one. Remember to remove such tags in
the future when the patches are changed non-trivially in a following
iteration.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  6 +++---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/acpi/ghes.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6d87ab7..dfb7dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
>  	int flags = -1;
>  	int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>  	struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -	mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
> +	mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

        struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

while you're at it.

>  	if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
>  		return;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -			mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
> +			mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto

+ add a \n here.

>  			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>  
>  			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
> -			pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
> +			pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  			if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d425374..8328a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP	" "
>  
> @@ -386,8 +387,9 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>  	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>  }
>  
> -static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> -	const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
> +static void
> +cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> +			   int sec_no)
>  {
>  	uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -403,14 +405,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
>  	if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
> +
> +		proc_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
>  			cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> +
> +		mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >=
>  		    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> @@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
> +
> +		pcie = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
>  			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
> @@ -438,7 +446,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
> -	unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> +	unsigned int data_len;
>  	int sec_no = 0;
>  	char newpfx[64];
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -452,11 +460,10 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;

<-- \n here while you're at it.

We have to start making this code more readable. It looks write-only
right now.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
>  		cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  		sec_no++;
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -486,12 +493,12 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  		return rc;
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
> -		if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))

Ditto.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> +		gedata_len = acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata);
> +		if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_get_size(gdata))
>  			return -EINVAL;

<-- \n here too

> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  	}
>  	if (data_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 68f088a..b89361a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
>  #define GHES_TO_CLEAR		0x0001
>  #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
>  
> +#define acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata)	\
> +	(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
> +#define acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)		\
> +	((acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) >= 3) ?	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) :	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata)	\
> +	(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) +		\
> +	acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_next(gdata)		\
> +	((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_version(gdata)			\
> +	(gdata->revision >> 8)

Make all those inline functions.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
	robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org,
	zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com,
	labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com,
	rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
	tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
	Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com,
	harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
	john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, joe@perches.com,
	rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, gengdongjiu@huawei.com,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 spec adds a new version of the generic data structure.

which data structure? HEST?

> Add support to handle the new structure as well as properly verify
> and iterate through the generic data entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

This is clearly a new version of the patch so Reviewed-by tags don't
apply anymore. Ditto for the next one. Remember to remove such tags in
the future when the patches are changed non-trivially in a following
iteration.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  6 +++---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/acpi/ghes.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6d87ab7..dfb7dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
>  	int flags = -1;
>  	int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>  	struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -	mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
> +	mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

        struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

while you're at it.

>  	if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
>  		return;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -			mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
> +			mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto

+ add a \n here.

>  			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>  
>  			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
> -			pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
> +			pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  			if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d425374..8328a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP	" "
>  
> @@ -386,8 +387,9 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>  	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>  }
>  
> -static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> -	const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
> +static void
> +cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> +			   int sec_no)
>  {
>  	uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -403,14 +405,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
>  	if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
> +
> +		proc_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
>  			cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> +
> +		mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >=
>  		    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> @@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
> +
> +		pcie = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
>  			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
> @@ -438,7 +446,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
> -	unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> +	unsigned int data_len;
>  	int sec_no = 0;
>  	char newpfx[64];
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -452,11 +460,10 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;

<-- \n here while you're at it.

We have to start making this code more readable. It looks write-only
right now.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
>  		cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  		sec_no++;
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -486,12 +493,12 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  		return rc;
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
> -		if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))

Ditto.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> +		gedata_len = acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata);
> +		if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_get_size(gdata))
>  			return -EINVAL;

<-- \n here too

> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  	}
>  	if (data_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 68f088a..b89361a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
>  #define GHES_TO_CLEAR		0x0001
>  #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
>  
> +#define acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata)	\
> +	(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
> +#define acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)		\
> +	((acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) >= 3) ?	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) :	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata)	\
> +	(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) +		\
> +	acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_next(gdata)		\
> +	((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_version(gdata)			\
> +	(gdata->revision >> 8)

Make all those inline functions.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	rkrcmar-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org,
	catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
	lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org,
	robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	lv.zheng-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	nkaje-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	eun.taik.lee-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	shijie.huang-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	rruigrok-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	paul.gortmaker-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
	tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	bristot-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 spec adds a new version of the generic data structure.

which data structure? HEST?

> Add support to handle the new structure as well as properly verify
> and iterate through the generic data entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

This is clearly a new version of the patch so Reviewed-by tags don't
apply anymore. Ditto for the next one. Remember to remove such tags in
the future when the patches are changed non-trivially in a following
iteration.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  6 +++---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/acpi/ghes.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6d87ab7..dfb7dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
>  	int flags = -1;
>  	int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>  	struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -	mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
> +	mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

        struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

while you're at it.

>  	if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
>  		return;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -			mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
> +			mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto

+ add a \n here.

>  			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>  
>  			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
> -			pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
> +			pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  			if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d425374..8328a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP	" "
>  
> @@ -386,8 +387,9 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>  	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>  }
>  
> -static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> -	const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
> +static void
> +cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> +			   int sec_no)
>  {
>  	uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -403,14 +405,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
>  	if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
> +
> +		proc_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
>  			cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> +
> +		mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >=
>  		    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> @@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
> +
> +		pcie = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
>  			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
> @@ -438,7 +446,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
> -	unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> +	unsigned int data_len;
>  	int sec_no = 0;
>  	char newpfx[64];
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -452,11 +460,10 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;

<-- \n here while you're at it.

We have to start making this code more readable. It looks write-only
right now.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
>  		cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  		sec_no++;
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -486,12 +493,12 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  		return rc;
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
> -		if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))

Ditto.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> +		gedata_len = acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata);
> +		if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_get_size(gdata))
>  			return -EINVAL;

<-- \n here too

> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  	}
>  	if (data_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 68f088a..b89361a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
>  #define GHES_TO_CLEAR		0x0001
>  #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
>  
> +#define acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata)	\
> +	(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
> +#define acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)		\
> +	((acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) >= 3) ?	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) :	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata)	\
> +	(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) +		\
> +	acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_next(gdata)		\
> +	((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_version(gdata)			\
> +	(gdata->revision >> 8)

Make all those inline functions.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 spec adds a new version of the generic data structure.

which data structure? HEST?

> Add support to handle the new structure as well as properly verify
> and iterate through the generic data entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

This is clearly a new version of the patch so Reviewed-by tags don't
apply anymore. Ditto for the next one. Remember to remove such tags in
the future when the patches are changed non-trivially in a following
iteration.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  6 +++---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/acpi/ghes.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6d87ab7..dfb7dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
>  	int flags = -1;
>  	int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>  	struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -	mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
> +	mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

        struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

while you're at it.

>  	if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
>  		return;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> -			mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
> +			mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto

+ add a \n here.

>  			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>  
>  			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>  		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>  				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>  			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
> -			pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
> +			pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  			if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
>  			    pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d425374..8328a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>  
>  #define INDENT_SP	" "
>  
> @@ -386,8 +387,9 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>  	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>  }
>  
> -static void cper_estatus_print_section(
> -	const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
> +static void
> +cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> +			   int sec_no)
>  {
>  	uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -403,14 +405,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
>  	if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
> +
> +		proc_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
>  			cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> +
> +		mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >=
>  		    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> @@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
>  		else
>  			goto err_section_too_small;
>  	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> -		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
> +		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
> +
> +		pcie = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);

Ditto.

>  		printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
>  		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
>  			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
> @@ -438,7 +446,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
> -	unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
> +	unsigned int data_len;
>  	int sec_no = 0;
>  	char newpfx[64];
>  	__u16 severity;
> @@ -452,11 +460,10 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
>  	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;

<-- \n here while you're@it.

We have to start making this code more readable. It looks write-only
right now.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
>  		cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  		sec_no++;
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -486,12 +493,12 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>  		return rc;
>  	data_len = estatus->data_length;
>  	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
> -	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
> -		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
> -		if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))

Ditto.

> +	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)) {
> +		gedata_len = acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata);
> +		if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_get_size(gdata))
>  			return -EINVAL;

<-- \n here too

> -		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
> -		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
> +		data_len -= acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata);
> +		gdata = acpi_hest_get_next(gdata);
>  	}
>  	if (data_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 68f088a..b89361a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
>  #define GHES_TO_CLEAR		0x0001
>  #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
>  
> +#define acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata)	\
> +	(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
> +#define acpi_hest_get_size(gdata)		\
> +	((acpi_hest_get_version(gdata) >= 3) ?	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) :	\
> +	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata)	\
> +	(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) +		\
> +	acpi_hest_get_error_length(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_next(gdata)		\
> +	((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_get_record_size(gdata))
> +#define acpi_hest_get_version(gdata)			\
> +	(gdata->revision >> 8)

Make all those inline functions.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-18 23:05 [PATCH V15 00/11] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 01/11] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-2-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 18:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]       ` <20170419183112.x7tmjzpoq7ds64s2-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 20:31         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:41           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20 11:14     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 12:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 12:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 12:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 16:04     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 16:04       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 16:04       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 17:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:08         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:08           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:08           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:12           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:12             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:12             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 17:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:22     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:22       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:22       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-24 17:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 17:52         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 17:52         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:05         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:05           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:05           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:31           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 05/11] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 06/11] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-25 17:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:41     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:28   ` James Morse
2017-05-08 17:28     ` James Morse
2017-05-08 17:28     ` James Morse
     [not found]     ` <5910AAB8.8070703-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-08 19:59       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:59         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:59         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-12 16:45         ` James Morse
2017-05-12 16:45           ` James Morse
2017-05-12 16:45           ` James Morse
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-7-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55   ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 07/11] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-28 13:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-28 13:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-28 13:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 08/11] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 13:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 13:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 13:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 09/11] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 17:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 17:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 17:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:44   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-05 18:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-05 18:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 11/11] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 19:54     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 20:22       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170420111451.6mo4o2oulwal3j33@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp-gina5biwoiwzqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bristot-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=eun.taik.lee-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nkaje-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rruigrok-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sandeepa.s.prabhu-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shijie.huang-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=zjzhang-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.