All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, lv.zheng@intel.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, fu.wei@linaro.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	gengdongjiu@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, shijie.huang@arm.com,
	labbott@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, harba@codeaurora.org,
	john.garry@huawei.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	punit.agrawal@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, nkaje@codeaurora.org,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, rruigrok@codeaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, astone@redhat.com,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, joe@perches.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, bristot@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:04:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35cc4ae0-e8fa-fd3a-5d7f-243ed2e82ea0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170421122150.76cce2cfrt767glv@pd.tnic>

On 4/21/2017 6:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:15PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 spec added a timestamp to the HEST generic data
> HEST?
>
> I see the timestamp in
>
> Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry
>
> where those things are "One or more Generic Error Data Entry structures
> may be recorded in the Generic Error Data Entries field of the Generic
> Error Status Block structure."
>
> And those are part of the "18.3.2.7 Generic Hardware Error Source",
> i.e., GHES. So why do you say "HEST" above?
Ah yes, this should be GHES no HEST. There are too many acronyms 
involved here :)
>
>> structure. Print the timestamp out when printing out the error
>> status information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Remove those Reviewed-by:s
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> index 8328a6f..46585f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/aer.h>
>> +#include <linux/printk.h>
>> +#include <linux/bcd.h>
>>   #include <acpi/ghes.h>
>>   
>>   #define INDENT_SP	" "
>> @@ -387,6 +389,29 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>>   	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
> cper_print_tstamp()
>
>> +				   struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata)
>> +{
>> +	__u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp;
>> +
>> +	if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) {
>> +		timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp);
>> +		sec       = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]);
>> +		min       = bcd2bin(timestamp[1]);
>> +		hour      = bcd2bin(timestamp[2]);
>> +		day       = bcd2bin(timestamp[4]);
>> +		mon       = bcd2bin(timestamp[5]);
>> +		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>> +		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>> +
>> +		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
>> +			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
>> +
>> +		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
>> +			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
> Yeah, about the precise tstamp, you can do something like this:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 46585f92b741..a649884e2264 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,8 @@ static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
>   		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>   		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>   
> -		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
> -			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
> -
> -		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +		printk("%s%ststamp: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +			(timestamp[3] & 0x1 ? "precise " : ""),
>   			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
>   	}
>   }
This is basically what I already had in v14...you asked to move it into 
a different if-statement? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/397

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
	robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org,
	zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com,
	labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com,
	rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
	tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
	Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com,
	harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
	john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, joe@perches.com,
	rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, gengdongjiu@huawei.com,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:04:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35cc4ae0-e8fa-fd3a-5d7f-243ed2e82ea0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170421122150.76cce2cfrt767glv@pd.tnic>

On 4/21/2017 6:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:15PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 spec added a timestamp to the HEST generic data
> HEST?
>
> I see the timestamp in
>
> Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry
>
> where those things are "One or more Generic Error Data Entry structures
> may be recorded in the Generic Error Data Entries field of the Generic
> Error Status Block structure."
>
> And those are part of the "18.3.2.7 Generic Hardware Error Source",
> i.e., GHES. So why do you say "HEST" above?
Ah yes, this should be GHES no HEST. There are too many acronyms 
involved here :)
>
>> structure. Print the timestamp out when printing out the error
>> status information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Remove those Reviewed-by:s
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> index 8328a6f..46585f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/aer.h>
>> +#include <linux/printk.h>
>> +#include <linux/bcd.h>
>>   #include <acpi/ghes.h>
>>   
>>   #define INDENT_SP	" "
>> @@ -387,6 +389,29 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>>   	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
> cper_print_tstamp()
>
>> +				   struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata)
>> +{
>> +	__u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp;
>> +
>> +	if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) {
>> +		timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp);
>> +		sec       = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]);
>> +		min       = bcd2bin(timestamp[1]);
>> +		hour      = bcd2bin(timestamp[2]);
>> +		day       = bcd2bin(timestamp[4]);
>> +		mon       = bcd2bin(timestamp[5]);
>> +		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>> +		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>> +
>> +		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
>> +			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
>> +
>> +		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
>> +			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
> Yeah, about the precise tstamp, you can do something like this:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 46585f92b741..a649884e2264 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,8 @@ static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
>   		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>   		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>   
> -		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
> -			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
> -
> -		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +		printk("%s%ststamp: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +			(timestamp[3] & 0x1 ? "precise " : ""),
>   			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
>   	}
>   }
This is basically what I already had in v14...you asked to move it into 
a different if-statement? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/397

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tbaicar@codeaurora.org (Baicar, Tyler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:04:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35cc4ae0-e8fa-fd3a-5d7f-243ed2e82ea0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170421122150.76cce2cfrt767glv@pd.tnic>

On 4/21/2017 6:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:15PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 spec added a timestamp to the HEST generic data
> HEST?
>
> I see the timestamp in
>
> Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry
>
> where those things are "One or more Generic Error Data Entry structures
> may be recorded in the Generic Error Data Entries field of the Generic
> Error Status Block structure."
>
> And those are part of the "18.3.2.7 Generic Hardware Error Source",
> i.e., GHES. So why do you say "HEST" above?
Ah yes, this should be GHES no HEST. There are too many acronyms 
involved here :)
>
>> structure. Print the timestamp out when printing out the error
>> status information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Remove those Reviewed-by:s
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> index 8328a6f..46585f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/aer.h>
>> +#include <linux/printk.h>
>> +#include <linux/bcd.h>
>>   #include <acpi/ghes.h>
>>   
>>   #define INDENT_SP	" "
>> @@ -387,6 +389,29 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>>   	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
> cper_print_tstamp()
>
>> +				   struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata)
>> +{
>> +	__u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp;
>> +
>> +	if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) {
>> +		timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp);
>> +		sec       = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]);
>> +		min       = bcd2bin(timestamp[1]);
>> +		hour      = bcd2bin(timestamp[2]);
>> +		day       = bcd2bin(timestamp[4]);
>> +		mon       = bcd2bin(timestamp[5]);
>> +		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>> +		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>> +
>> +		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
>> +			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
>> +
>> +		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
>> +			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
> Yeah, about the precise tstamp, you can do something like this:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 46585f92b741..a649884e2264 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,8 @@ static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
>   		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>   		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>   
> -		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
> -			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
> -
> -		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +		printk("%s%ststamp: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +			(timestamp[3] & 0x1 ? "precise " : ""),
>   			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
>   	}
>   }
This is basically what I already had in v14...you asked to move it into 
a different if-statement? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/397

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-18 23:05 [PATCH V15 00/11] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 01/11] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-2-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 18:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 18:31       ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]       ` <20170419183112.x7tmjzpoq7ds64s2-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 20:31         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:31           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-19 20:41           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-19 20:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 02/11] ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-3-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20 11:14     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-20 11:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 12:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 12:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 12:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 16:04     ` Baicar, Tyler [this message]
2017-04-21 16:04       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 16:04       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 17:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:08         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:08           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:08           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:12           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:12             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:12             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-21 17:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 17:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-21 18:22     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:22       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-21 18:22       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-24 17:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 17:52         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 17:52         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:05         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:05           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:05           ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 16:31           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 16:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 05/11] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 06/11] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-25 17:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:41     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:41       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-04-25 17:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:28   ` James Morse
2017-05-08 17:28     ` James Morse
2017-05-08 17:28     ` James Morse
     [not found]     ` <5910AAB8.8070703-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-08 19:59       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:59         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:59         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-12 16:45         ` James Morse
2017-05-12 16:45           ` James Morse
2017-05-12 16:45           ` James Morse
     [not found]   ` <1492556723-9189-7-git-send-email-tbaicar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55   ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-08-14  7:55     ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 07/11] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-28 13:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-28 13:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-28 13:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 08/11] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 13:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 13:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 13:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 09/11] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-05 17:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 17:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 17:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:44   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-05 18:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-05 18:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH V15 11/11] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-04-18 23:05   ` Tyler Baicar
2017-05-08 17:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 17:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 19:54     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 19:54       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-05-08 20:22       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-08 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35cc4ae0-e8fa-fd3a-5d7f-243ed2e82ea0@codeaurora.org \
    --to=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=astone@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=eun.taik.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=nkaje@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rruigrok@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.