All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard
	<benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org>,
	"patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org"
	<patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Walleij
	<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Jonathan Hunter
	<jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Sylvain Lemieux
	<slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth
	<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org"
	<linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
	"rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org"
	<rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:35:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net> (raw)

On 20/06/2017 at 22:15:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > 2017-06-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>:
> > >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
> > >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
> > >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
> > 
> > What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
> > coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
> > deprecated.
> 
> I'd say that they should not be marked as deprecated.  They're entirely
> appropriate for use with hardware that only supports a 32-bit
> representation of time.
> 
> It's entirely reasonable to fix the ones that use other representations
> that exceed that, but for those which do not, we need to keep using the
> 32-bit versions.  Doing so actually gives us _more_ flexibility in the
> future.
> 
> Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> start at a well known epoch.  We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean
> dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross
> another 0x40000000 seconds.  Unless someone invents a real time machine,
> we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970.
> 

I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
(apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")

I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
platform can pass 2038 properly.
My opinion is that as long as userspace is not ready to handle those
dates, it doesn't really matter because it is quite unlikely that
anything will be able to continue running anyway.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
	"patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
	<patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
	"adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:35:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net> (raw)

On 20/06/2017 at 22:15:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > 2017-06-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>:
> > >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
> > >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
> > >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
> > 
> > What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
> > coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
> > deprecated.
> 
> I'd say that they should not be marked as deprecated.  They're entirely
> appropriate for use with hardware that only supports a 32-bit
> representation of time.
> 
> It's entirely reasonable to fix the ones that use other representations
> that exceed that, but for those which do not, we need to keep using the
> 32-bit versions.  Doing so actually gives us _more_ flexibility in the
> future.
> 
> Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> start at a well known epoch.  We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean
> dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross
> another 0x40000000 seconds.  Unless someone invents a real time machine,
> we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970.
> 

I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
(apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")

I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
platform can pass 2038 properly.
My opinion is that as long as userspace is not ready to handle those
dates, it doesn't really matter because it is quite unlikely that
anything will be able to continue running anyway.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
	"patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
	<patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
	"adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:35:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net> (raw)

On 20/06/2017 at 22:15:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > 2017-06-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>:
> > >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
> > >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
> > >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
> > 
> > What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
> > coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
> > deprecated.
> 
> I'd say that they should not be marked as deprecated.  They're entirely
> appropriate for use with hardware that only supports a 32-bit
> representation of time.
> 
> It's entirely reasonable to fix the ones that use other representations
> that exceed that, but for those which do not, we need to keep using the
> 32-bit versions.  Doing so actually gives us _more_ flexibility in the
> future.
> 
> Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> start at a well known epoch.  We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean
> dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross
> another 0x40000000 seconds.  Unless someone invents a real time machine,
> we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970.
> 

I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
(apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")

I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
platform can pass 2038 properly.
My opinion is that as long as userspace is not ready to handle those
dates, it doesn't really matter because it is quite unlikely that
anything will be able to continue running anyway.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard
	<benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org>,
	"patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org"
	<patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Walleij
	<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Jonathan Hunter
	<jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Sylvain Lemieux
	<slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth
	<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org"
	<linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
	"rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org"
	<rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:35:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net> (raw)

On 20/06/2017 at 22:15:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > 2017-06-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>:
> > >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
> > >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
> > >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
> > 
> > What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
> > coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
> > deprecated.
> 
> I'd say that they should not be marked as deprecated.  They're entirely
> appropriate for use with hardware that only supports a 32-bit
> representation of time.
> 
> It's entirely reasonable to fix the ones that use other representations
> that exceed that, but for those which do not, we need to keep using the
> 32-bit versions.  Doing so actually gives us _more_ flexibility in the
> future.
> 
> Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> start at a well known epoch.  We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean
> dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross
> another 0x40000000 seconds.  Unless someone invents a real time machine,
> we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970.
> 

I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
(apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")

I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
platform can pass 2038 properly.
My opinion is that as long as userspace is not ready to handle those
dates, it doesn't really matter because it is quite unlikely that
anything will be able to continue running anyway.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

             reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-20 21:35 Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2017-06-20 21:35 ` [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 21:35 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 21:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found] ` <20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 22:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:00     ` [rtc-linux] " Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-20 22:38     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:38       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:38       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:38       ` [rtc-linux] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:38       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  7:51     ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  7:51       ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  7:51       ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  7:51       ` [rtc-linux] " Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  7:51       ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  8:39       ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  8:39         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  8:39         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  8:39         ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  8:39         ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found]         ` <20170621083907.y3gadsmsoufa5niv-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21  6:34           ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  6:34             ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  6:34             ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  6:34             ` [rtc-linux] " Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  6:34             ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 12:35             ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 12:35               ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 12:35               ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 12:35               ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21 12:35               ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found]               ` <20170621123535.b5fvwlydfhnhuqll-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21 18:08                 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 18:08                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 18:08                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 18:08                   ` [rtc-linux] " Pavel Machek
2017-06-21 18:08                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  9:19           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  9:19             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  9:19             ` [rtc-linux] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  9:19             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]             ` <20170621091948.GP4902-l+eeeJia6m9URfEZ8mYm6t73F7V6hmMc@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21  9:41               ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  9:41                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  9:41                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  9:41                 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-21  9:41                 ` Alexandre Belloni
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-20  9:35 Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20  9:35 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20  9:35 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20  9:35 ` Benjamin Gaignard
     [not found] ` <1497951359-13334-1-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 10:03   ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:03     ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:03     ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:03     ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found]     ` <20170620100348.zh4ygvjjgnhxvmvl-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 10:07       ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:07         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:07         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 10:07         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 12:10       ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 12:10         ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 12:10         ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 12:10         ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 12:24         ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 12:24           ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 12:24           ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 12:24           ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found]           ` <20170620122400.sm7qqvwyj6cuzarw-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 13:26             ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:26               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:26               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:26               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:37               ` Steve Twiss
2017-06-20 13:37                 ` Steve Twiss
2017-06-20 13:37                 ` Steve Twiss
2017-06-20 13:37                 ` Steve Twiss
     [not found]                 ` <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7018CD96FCD-68WUHU125fLzLL1Oxlh9IgLouzNaz+3S@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 13:44                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:44                     ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:44                     ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:44                     ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 13:48                     ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 13:48                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 13:48                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-20 13:48                       ` Alexandre Belloni
     [not found]                       ` <20170620134827.ubvzhh25klaotupv-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 15:07                         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20 15:07                           ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20 15:07                           ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-20 15:07                           ` Benjamin Gaignard
     [not found]                           ` <CA+M3ks68+z6nDtYM8CDpso7SxjB6Nt5E=rOc1yxx=kDz6PUeVQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 21:15                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 21:15                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 21:15                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 21:15                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]                               ` <20170620211536.GM4902-l+eeeJia6m9URfEZ8mYm6t73F7V6hmMc@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21  9:26                                 ` David Laight
2017-06-21  9:26                                   ` David Laight
2017-06-21  9:26                                   ` David Laight
2017-06-21  9:26                                   ` David Laight
     [not found]                                   ` <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD00278C0-VkEWCZq2GCInGFn1LkZF6NBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21  9:35                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  9:35                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-21  9:35                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-20 22:08                             ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 22:08                               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 22:08                               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-20 22:08                               ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-21  9:14                               ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-21  9:14                                 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-21  9:14                                 ` Benjamin Gaignard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170620213507.urobmtg34vzubrdq@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=baruch-NswTu9S1W3P6gbPvEgmw2w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.