Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions

[Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

2017-06-21 0:08 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>:
> Hi!
>
>> >> > This is it.
>> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6219401/
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
>> >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
>> >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
>>
>> What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
>> coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
>> deprecated.
>>
>> I agree that will change nothing of hardware limitation but at least
>> the limit will
>> not come from the framework.
>
>> > Yes, we agree on that but I won't cherry pick working patches from a 51
>> > patches series.
>
> Well, it would be actually nice for you to do the cherry
> picking. That's something maintainers do, because it is hard for
> contributors to guess maintainer's taste.
>
> Anyway, it looks like someone should go through all the RTC drivers,
> and document their limitations of each driver (date in future when
> hardware ceases to be useful). If Benjamin has time to do that, I
> guess that removes all the objections to the series.

Without the datasheet I can check in driver code what they do in read/set
time functions to understand their limitations. All drivers using BCD
like system
or spliting day and time should be fixed. I can do a subset of my patches
including those driver + the acked ones.

Alexandre does that sound reasonable for you ?


> Regards,
>                                                                         Pavel
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html