All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] spi: pxa2xx: Only claim CS GPIOs when the slave device is created
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:29:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804102929.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a691263ccf9d61134d6184861b37eaf37b13b77.1501760433.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:40:33PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> 
> Avoid hogging chip select GPIOs just because they are listed for the
> master. They might be mulitplexed and, if no slave device is attached,
> used for different purposes. Moreover, this strategy avoids having to
> allocate a cs_gpiods structure.
> 
> Tested on the IOT2000 where the second SPI bus is connected to an
> Arduino-compatible connector and multiplexed between SPI, GPIO and PWM
> usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel-cYrQPVfZoowdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang
	<haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko
	<andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] spi: pxa2xx: Only claim CS GPIOs when the slave device is created
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:29:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804102929.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a691263ccf9d61134d6184861b37eaf37b13b77.1501760433.git.jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:40:33PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Avoid hogging chip select GPIOs just because they are listed for the
> master. They might be mulitplexed and, if no slave device is attached,
> used for different purposes. Moreover, this strategy avoids having to
> allocate a cs_gpiods structure.
> 
> Tested on the IOT2000 where the second SPI bus is connected to an
> Arduino-compatible connector and multiplexed between SPI, GPIO and PWM
> usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com (Mika Westerberg)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/2] spi: pxa2xx: Only claim CS GPIOs when the slave device is created
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:29:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804102929.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a691263ccf9d61134d6184861b37eaf37b13b77.1501760433.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:40:33PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> 
> Avoid hogging chip select GPIOs just because they are listed for the
> master. They might be mulitplexed and, if no slave device is attached,
> used for different purposes. Moreover, this strategy avoids having to
> allocate a cs_gpiods structure.
> 
> Tested on the IOT2000 where the second SPI bus is connected to an
> Arduino-compatible connector and multiplexed between SPI, GPIO and PWM
> usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-03 11:40 [PATCH RFC 0/2] spi: pxa2xx: gpiod cleanups and late CS GPIO allocation Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] spi: pxa2xx: Convert to GPIO descriptor API where possible Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40   ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40   ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-04 10:10   ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:10     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:10     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:18     ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-04 10:18       ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-04 10:18       ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-04 10:24       ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:24         ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:24         ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 11:43         ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:43           ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:43           ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:44   ` Applied "spi: pxa2xx: Convert to GPIO descriptor API where possible" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:44     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:44     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-03 11:40 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] spi: pxa2xx: Only claim CS GPIOs when the slave device is created Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40   ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-03 11:40   ` Jan Kiszka
2017-08-04 10:29   ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2017-08-04 10:29     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 10:29     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-08-04 11:43   ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:43     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-04 11:43     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170804102929.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.