All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [v8 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:17:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911131742.16482-2-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170911131742.16482-1-guro@fb.com>

The oom_kill_process() function consists of two logical parts:
the first one is responsible for considering task's children as
a potential victim and printing the debug information.
The second half is responsible for sending SIGKILL to all
tasks sharing the mm struct with the given victim.

This commit splits the oom_kill_process() function with
an intention to re-use the the second half: __oom_kill_process().

The cgroup-aware OOM killer will kill multiple tasks
belonging to the victim cgroup. We don't need to print
the debug information for the each task, as well as play
with task selection (considering task's children),
so we can't use the existing oom_kill_process().

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 99736e026712..f061b627092c 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -804,68 +804,12 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
+static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = oc->chosen;
-	unsigned int points = oc->chosen_points;
-	struct task_struct *victim = p;
-	struct task_struct *child;
-	struct task_struct *t;
+	struct task_struct *p;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
-	unsigned int victim_points = 0;
-	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
-					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
 	bool can_oom_reap = true;
 
-	/*
-	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
-	 * its children or threads, just give it access to memory reserves
-	 * so it can die quickly
-	 */
-	task_lock(p);
-	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
-		mark_oom_victim(p);
-		wake_oom_reaper(p);
-		task_unlock(p);
-		put_task_struct(p);
-		return;
-	}
-	task_unlock(p);
-
-	if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
-		dump_header(oc, p);
-
-	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %u or sacrifice child\n",
-		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
-
-	/*
-	 * If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
-	 * the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
-	 * parent.  This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
-	 * still freeing memory.
-	 */
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-	for_each_thread(p, t) {
-		list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
-			unsigned int child_points;
-
-			if (process_shares_mm(child, p->mm))
-				continue;
-			/*
-			 * oom_badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable
-			 */
-			child_points = oom_badness(child,
-				oc->memcg, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
-			if (child_points > victim_points) {
-				put_task_struct(victim);
-				victim = child;
-				victim_points = child_points;
-				get_task_struct(victim);
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-
 	p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
 	if (!p) {
 		put_task_struct(victim);
@@ -939,6 +883,69 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
 }
 #undef K
 
+static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p = oc->chosen;
+	unsigned int points = oc->chosen_points;
+	struct task_struct *victim = p;
+	struct task_struct *child;
+	struct task_struct *t;
+	unsigned int victim_points = 0;
+	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
+	 * its children or threads, just give it access to memory reserves
+	 * so it can die quickly
+	 */
+	task_lock(p);
+	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
+		mark_oom_victim(p);
+		wake_oom_reaper(p);
+		task_unlock(p);
+		put_task_struct(p);
+		return;
+	}
+	task_unlock(p);
+
+	if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
+		dump_header(oc, p);
+
+	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %u or sacrifice child\n",
+		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
+
+	/*
+	 * If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
+	 * the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
+	 * parent.  This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
+	 * still freeing memory.
+	 */
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	for_each_thread(p, t) {
+		list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
+			unsigned int child_points;
+
+			if (process_shares_mm(child, p->mm))
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * oom_badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable
+			 */
+			child_points = oom_badness(child,
+				oc->memcg, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
+			if (child_points > victim_points) {
+				put_task_struct(victim);
+				victim = child;
+				victim_points = child_points;
+				get_task_struct(victim);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+	__oom_kill_process(victim);
+}
+
 /*
  * Determines whether the kernel must panic because of the panic_on_oom sysctl.
  */
-- 
2.13.5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v8 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:17:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911131742.16482-2-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170911131742.16482-1-guro@fb.com>

The oom_kill_process() function consists of two logical parts:
the first one is responsible for considering task's children as
a potential victim and printing the debug information.
The second half is responsible for sending SIGKILL to all
tasks sharing the mm struct with the given victim.

This commit splits the oom_kill_process() function with
an intention to re-use the the second half: __oom_kill_process().

The cgroup-aware OOM killer will kill multiple tasks
belonging to the victim cgroup. We don't need to print
the debug information for the each task, as well as play
with task selection (considering task's children),
so we can't use the existing oom_kill_process().

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 99736e026712..f061b627092c 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -804,68 +804,12 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
+static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = oc->chosen;
-	unsigned int points = oc->chosen_points;
-	struct task_struct *victim = p;
-	struct task_struct *child;
-	struct task_struct *t;
+	struct task_struct *p;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
-	unsigned int victim_points = 0;
-	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
-					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
 	bool can_oom_reap = true;
 
-	/*
-	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
-	 * its children or threads, just give it access to memory reserves
-	 * so it can die quickly
-	 */
-	task_lock(p);
-	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
-		mark_oom_victim(p);
-		wake_oom_reaper(p);
-		task_unlock(p);
-		put_task_struct(p);
-		return;
-	}
-	task_unlock(p);
-
-	if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
-		dump_header(oc, p);
-
-	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %u or sacrifice child\n",
-		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
-
-	/*
-	 * If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
-	 * the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
-	 * parent.  This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
-	 * still freeing memory.
-	 */
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-	for_each_thread(p, t) {
-		list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
-			unsigned int child_points;
-
-			if (process_shares_mm(child, p->mm))
-				continue;
-			/*
-			 * oom_badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable
-			 */
-			child_points = oom_badness(child,
-				oc->memcg, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
-			if (child_points > victim_points) {
-				put_task_struct(victim);
-				victim = child;
-				victim_points = child_points;
-				get_task_struct(victim);
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-
 	p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
 	if (!p) {
 		put_task_struct(victim);
@@ -939,6 +883,69 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
 }
 #undef K
 
+static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p = oc->chosen;
+	unsigned int points = oc->chosen_points;
+	struct task_struct *victim = p;
+	struct task_struct *child;
+	struct task_struct *t;
+	unsigned int victim_points = 0;
+	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
+	 * its children or threads, just give it access to memory reserves
+	 * so it can die quickly
+	 */
+	task_lock(p);
+	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
+		mark_oom_victim(p);
+		wake_oom_reaper(p);
+		task_unlock(p);
+		put_task_struct(p);
+		return;
+	}
+	task_unlock(p);
+
+	if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
+		dump_header(oc, p);
+
+	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %u or sacrifice child\n",
+		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
+
+	/*
+	 * If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
+	 * the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
+	 * parent.  This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
+	 * still freeing memory.
+	 */
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	for_each_thread(p, t) {
+		list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
+			unsigned int child_points;
+
+			if (process_shares_mm(child, p->mm))
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * oom_badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable
+			 */
+			child_points = oom_badness(child,
+				oc->memcg, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
+			if (child_points > victim_points) {
+				put_task_struct(victim);
+				victim = child;
+				victim_points = child_points;
+				get_task_struct(victim);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+	__oom_kill_process(victim);
+}
+
 /*
  * Determines whether the kernel must panic because of the panic_on_oom sysctl.
  */
-- 
2.13.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-11 13:17 [v8 0/4] cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2017-09-11 13:17   ` [v8 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:51   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-11 20:51     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-14 13:42   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 13:42     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-13 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 20:46     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 21:59     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-13 21:59       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-13 21:59       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 3/4] mm, oom: add cgroup v2 mount option for " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:48   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-11 20:48     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-12 20:01     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-12 20:01       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-12 20:23       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-12 20:23         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 12:23       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 12:23         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 4/4] mm, oom, docs: describe the " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:44 ` [v8 0/4] " David Rientjes
2017-09-11 20:44   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 12:29   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 12:29     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 20:46     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 20:46       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-14 13:34       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 13:34         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 20:07         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-14 20:07           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 21:56     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-13 21:56       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-14 13:40       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 13:40         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 16:05         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-14 16:05           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 10:58           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-15 10:58             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-15 15:23             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 15:23               ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 19:55               ` David Rientjes
2017-09-15 19:55                 ` David Rientjes
2017-09-15 21:08                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 21:08                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-18  6:20                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18  6:20                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18 15:02                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-18 15:02                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-18 15:02                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21  8:30                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21  8:30                         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-19 20:54                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-19 20:54                     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-20 22:24                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-20 22:24                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21  8:27                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21  8:27                         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-18  6:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18  6:16                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-19 20:51                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-19 20:51                     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-18  6:14               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18  6:14                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-20 21:53                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-20 21:53                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-20 21:53                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-25 12:24                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 12:24                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 17:00                     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-25 17:00                       ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-25 18:15                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-25 18:15                         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-25 20:25                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 20:25                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 20:25                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 10:59                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 10:59                             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 11:21                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 11:21                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 12:13                               ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 12:13                                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 12:13                                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 13:30                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 13:30                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 17:26                                   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-26 17:26                                     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-27  3:37                                     ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27  3:37                                       ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27  7:43                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  7:43                                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 10:19                                         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 10:19                                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 10:19                                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 15:35                                         ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27 15:35                                           ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27 16:23                                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 16:23                                             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 18:11                                             ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27 18:11                                               ` Tim Hockin
2017-10-01 23:29                                               ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-01 23:29                                                 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 11:56                                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-02 11:56                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-02 12:24                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 12:24                                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 12:47                                                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-10-02 12:47                                                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-10-02 14:29                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 14:29                                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 14:29                                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:00                                                   ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:00                                                     ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:28                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:28                                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:45                                                       ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:45                                                         ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:56                                                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:56                                                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:00                                                           ` Tim Hockin
2017-10-02 20:00                                                             ` Tim Hockin
2017-10-02 20:08                                                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:08                                                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:09                                                             ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:20                                                             ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:20                                                               ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:24                                                           ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:24                                                             ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:34                                                             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-10-02 20:34                                                               ` Johannes Weiner
2017-10-02 20:55                                                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:55                                                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 22:21                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-25 22:21                         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-26  8:46                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26  8:46                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 21:04                           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-26 21:04                             ` David Rientjes
2017-09-27  7:37                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  7:37                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  9:57                               ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27  9:57                                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21 14:21   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-21 14:21     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-21 21:17     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21 21:17       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21 21:17       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21 21:51       ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-21 21:51         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-22 20:53         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 20:53           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 15:44       ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-22 15:44         ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-22 15:44         ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-22 20:39         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 20:39           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 20:39           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 21:05           ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-22 21:05             ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-23  8:16             ` David Rientjes
2017-09-23  8:16               ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170911131742.16482-2-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.