From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
JamesHogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
"James E . J .Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan@ru.ibm.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
"Mark A . Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
RobertBaldyga <r.baldyga@hackerion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_56D97C65293D16191A2D88C9@qq.com>
I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for
the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well.
But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front
without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be
merged to stable.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: 陈华才 <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
JamesHogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
"James E . J .Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_56D97C65293D16191A2D88C9@qq.com>
I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for
the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well.
But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front
without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be
merged to stable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20171023071025epcas4p3e9b9c0af7c0a34561f0d57a20a4f9946@epcas4p3.samsung.com>
2017-10-23 7:12 ` [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() Huacai Chen
2017-10-23 7:12 ` Huacai Chen
2017-10-23 7:12 ` [PATCH V9 2/4] MIPS: Implement dma_map_ops::get_cache_alignment() Huacai Chen
2017-11-06 18:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-23 7:12 ` [PATCH V9 3/4] scsi: Align block queue to dma_get_cache_alignment() Huacai Chen
2017-11-05 2:39 ` kbuild test robot
2017-11-05 2:39 ` kbuild test robot
2017-11-05 2:39 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-23 7:12 ` [PATCH V9 4/4] libsas: Align sata_device's rps_resp on a cacheline Huacai Chen
2017-10-24 13:30 ` [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() Marek Szyprowski
2017-10-24 13:30 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-10-25 1:22 ` 陈华才
2017-10-25 1:22 ` 陈华才
2017-10-25 7:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-10-25 7:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-10-26 6:33 ` 陈华才
2017-10-26 6:33 ` 陈华才
2017-11-03 4:48 ` 陈华才
2017-11-03 4:48 ` 陈华才
2017-11-03 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-11-03 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 6:15 ` 陈华才
2017-11-03 6:15 ` 陈华才
2017-10-24 19:11 ` Mark Greer
2017-10-24 19:11 ` Mark Greer
2017-11-06 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-06 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-10 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-10 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-13 8:37 ` 陈华才
2017-11-13 8:37 ` 陈华才
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=ivan@ru.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@hackerion.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=zhangfx@lemote.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.