[PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..b86b83b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int irq;
+	int irq;
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (irq < 0)
+		return irq;
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
 			       IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, pdev->name, info);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..b86b83b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int irq;
+	int irq;
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (irq < 0)
+		return irq;
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
 			       IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, pdev->name, info);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..b86b83b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int irq;
+	int irq;
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (irq < 0)
+		return irq;
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
 			       IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, pdev->name, info);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
chnages in v2 :
              irq_id was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 8a643a3..11f5f2a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int mt8173_afe_init_audio_clk(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
 static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret, i;
-	unsigned int irq_id;
+	int irq_id;
 	struct mtk_base_afe *afe;
 	struct mt8173_afe_private *afe_priv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	afe->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
+	if (irq_id < 0) {
 		dev_err(afe->dev, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
+		return irq_id;
 	}
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8173_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
chnages in v2 :
              irq_id was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 8a643a3..11f5f2a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int mt8173_afe_init_audio_clk(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
 static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret, i;
-	unsigned int irq_id;
+	int irq_id;
 	struct mtk_base_afe *afe;
 	struct mt8173_afe_private *afe_priv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	afe->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
+	if (irq_id < 0) {
 		dev_err(afe->dev, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
+		return irq_id;
 	}
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8173_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
chnages in v2 :
              irq_id was unsigned. so changed it to signed.

 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 8a643a3..11f5f2a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int mt8173_afe_init_audio_clk(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
 static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret, i;
-	unsigned int irq_id;
+	int irq_id;
 	struct mtk_base_afe *afe;
 	struct mt8173_afe_private *afe_priv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	afe->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
+	if (irq_id < 0) {
 		dev_err(afe->dev, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
+		return irq_id;
 	}
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8173_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
             nuc900_audio->irq_num is unsigned. so handle through signed variable.

 sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
index b6615af..71fce7c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
@@ -345,11 +345,10 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!nuc900_audio->irq_num) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
+	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
+	nuc900_audio->irq_num = ret;
 
 	nuc900_ac97_data = nuc900_audio;
 
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
             nuc900_audio->irq_num is unsigned. so handle through signed variable.

 sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
index b6615af..71fce7c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
@@ -345,11 +345,10 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!nuc900_audio->irq_num) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
+	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
+	nuc900_audio->irq_num = ret;
 
 	nuc900_ac97_data = nuc900_audio;
 
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
             nuc900_audio->irq_num is unsigned. so handle through signed variable.

 sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
index b6615af..71fce7c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
@@ -345,11 +345,10 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!nuc900_audio->irq_num) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
+	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
+	nuc900_audio->irq_num = ret;
 
 	nuc900_ac97_data = nuc900_audio;
 
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:51AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:51AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

[PATCH 1/5 v2] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:51AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync@8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Re: [PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:52AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Re: [PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:52AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

[PATCH 2/5 v2] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:52AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync@8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:53AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:53AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

[PATCH 3/5 v2] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:57:53AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.

IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt.  The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync@8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up