From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock.
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:41:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120104129.GA25042@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120094237.z6h3kx3ne5ld64pl@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:42:37AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The patch has been dropped because allnoconfig failed to compile back
> then http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAP=VYLr0rPWi1aeuk4w1On9CYRNmnEWwJgGtaX=wEvGaBURtrg@mail.gmail.com
> I have problem to find the follow up discussion though. The main
> argument was that SRC is not generally available and so the core
> kernel should rely on it.
Paul,
isthere any good reason to not use SRCU in the core kernel and
instead try to reimplement it using atomic counters?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock.
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:41:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120104129.GA25042@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120094237.z6h3kx3ne5ld64pl@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:42:37AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The patch has been dropped because allnoconfig failed to compile back
> then http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAP=VYLr0rPWi1aeuk4w1On9CYRNmnEWwJgGtaX=wEvGaBURtrg@mail.gmail.com
> I have problem to find the follow up discussion though. The main
> argument was that SRC is not generally available and so the core
> kernel should rely on it.
Paul,
isthere any good reason to not use SRCU in the core kernel and
instead try to reimplement it using atomic counters?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-13 21:37 [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-13 21:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-13 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,vmscan: Allow parallel registration/unregistration of shrinkers Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-13 21:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-13 22:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock Shakeel Butt
2017-11-13 22:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-15 0:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-15 0:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-15 6:28 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-15 6:28 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-16 0:46 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-16 0:46 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-16 1:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-16 1:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-16 4:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-16 4:50 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-15 8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 9:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 9:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-16 17:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-16 17:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-23 23:46 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-23 23:46 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-15 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 10:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-15 10:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-15 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-16 0:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-16 0:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-11-15 13:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-15 13:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-16 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-16 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-15 14:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-15 14:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-11-15 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 2:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-25 2:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-25 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-25 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-25 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 22:19 ` Eric Wheeler
2018-01-25 22:19 ` Eric Wheeler
2018-01-26 3:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-26 3:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-26 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-26 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-17 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-17 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-17 17:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-17 17:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-17 17:53 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-17 17:53 ` Shakeel Butt
2017-11-17 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-17 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-20 9:25 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-20 9:25 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-20 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-20 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-20 9:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-20 9:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-20 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-11-20 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-20 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-20 10:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-20 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-20 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171120104129.GA25042@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.