* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: add a register write mask
2018-05-18 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 17:10 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:15 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: verify that we allow LRI on INSTPM Lionel Landwerlin
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2018-05-18 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev
Some register are masked (meaning the 16bits are dedicated to identify
which of the other 16bits have to be taken into account by the
hardware). This change adds the mask to the write but doesn't take it
into account in the value comparison assert.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
index b653b1bd..c37c056e 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
@@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ struct test_lri {
const char *name; /* register name for debug info */
uint32_t reg; /* address to test */
uint32_t read_mask; /* ignore things like HW status bits */
+ uint32_t write_mask; /* mask to write the register with */
uint32_t init_val; /* initial identifiable value to set without LRI */
uint32_t test_val; /* value to attempt loading via LRI command */
bool whitelisted; /* expect to become NOOP / fail if not whitelisted */
@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ test_lri(int fd, uint32_t handle, struct test_lri *test)
uint32_t lri[] = {
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM,
test->reg,
- test->test_val,
+ test->test_val | test->write_mask,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
int bad_lri_errno = parser_version >= 8 ? 0 : -EINVAL;
@@ -284,7 +285,8 @@ test_lri(int fd, uint32_t handle, struct test_lri *test)
test->name, test->reg, test->test_val,
expected_errno, expect);
- intel_register_write(test->reg, test->init_val);
+ intel_register_write(test->reg,
+ test->init_val | test->write_mask);
igt_assert_eq_u32((intel_register_read(test->reg) &
test->read_mask),
@@ -498,14 +500,16 @@ igt_main
}
igt_subtest_group {
-#define REG(R, MSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { #R, R, MSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
+#define REG(R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { #R, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
struct test_lri lris[] = {
/* dummy head pointer */
REG(OASTATUS2,
- 0xffffff80, 0xdeadf000, 0xbeeff000, false, 0),
+ 0xffffff80, 0x00000000,
+ 0xdeadf000, 0xbeeff000, false, 0),
/* NB: [1:0] MBZ */
REG(SO_WRITE_OFFSET_0,
- 0xfffffffc, 0xabcdabc0, 0xbeefbee0, true, 0),
+ 0xfffffffc, 0x00000000,
+ 0xabcdabc0, 0xbeefbee0, true, 0),
/* It's really important for us to check that
* an LRI to OACONTROL doesn't result in an
@@ -521,7 +525,8 @@ igt_main
* while leaving the OA unit disabled
*/
REG(OACONTROL,
- 0xfffff000, 0xfeed0000, 0x31337000, false, 9)
+ 0xfffff000, 0x00000000,
+ 0xfeed0000, 0x31337000, false, 9),
};
#undef REG
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: verify that we allow LRI on INSTPM
2018-05-18 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: add a register write mask Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 17:10 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:20 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+ Lionel Landwerlin
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2018-05-18 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev
INSTPM will be used by Mesa. It's allowed by default on Gen8+.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
index c37c056e..0818a6a5 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#define OASTATUS2 0x2368
#define OACONTROL 0x2360
#define SO_WRITE_OFFSET_0 0x5280
+#define INSTPM 0x20c0
#define HSW_CS_GPR(n) (0x2600 + 8*(n))
#define HSW_CS_GPR0 HSW_CS_GPR(0)
@@ -369,6 +370,7 @@ static void hsw_load_register_reg(void)
OACONTROL, /* filtered */
DERRMR, /* master only */
0x2038, /* RING_START: invalid */
+ INSTPM, /* filtered */
};
int fd;
uint32_t handle;
@@ -378,7 +380,7 @@ static void hsw_load_register_reg(void)
fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
igt_require(IS_HASWELL(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)));
- igt_require(parser_version >= 7);
+ igt_require(parser_version >= 10);
handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
@@ -501,6 +503,7 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest_group {
#define REG(R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { #R, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
+#define REGN(N, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { N, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
struct test_lri lris[] = {
/* dummy head pointer */
REG(OASTATUS2,
@@ -527,8 +530,19 @@ igt_main
REG(OACONTROL,
0xfffff000, 0x00000000,
0xfeed0000, 0x31337000, false, 9),
+ /*
+ * INSTPM is masked and only has 3bits
+ * allowed.
+ */
+ REGN("INSTPM-allowed", INSTPM,
+ 0x0000000e, 0x000e0000,
+ 0x00000000, 0x0000000e, true, 10),
+ REGN("INSTPM-disallowed", INSTPM,
+ 0x0000000e, 0x000e0000,
+ 0x00000000, 0x100e100e, false, 10)
};
#undef REG
+#undef REGN
igt_fixture {
intel_register_access_init(intel_get_pci_device(), 0, fd);
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: verify that we allow LRI on INSTPM
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: verify that we allow LRI on INSTPM Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 17:20 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-05-18 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin, igt-dev
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-05-18 18:10:42)
> INSTPM will be used by Mesa. It's allowed by default on Gen8+.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> index c37c056e..0818a6a5 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> #define OASTATUS2 0x2368
> #define OACONTROL 0x2360
> #define SO_WRITE_OFFSET_0 0x5280
> +#define INSTPM 0x20c0
>
> #define HSW_CS_GPR(n) (0x2600 + 8*(n))
> #define HSW_CS_GPR0 HSW_CS_GPR(0)
> @@ -369,6 +370,7 @@ static void hsw_load_register_reg(void)
> OACONTROL, /* filtered */
> DERRMR, /* master only */
> 0x2038, /* RING_START: invalid */
> + INSTPM, /* filtered */
> };
> int fd;
> uint32_t handle;
> @@ -378,7 +380,7 @@ static void hsw_load_register_reg(void)
> fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>
> igt_require(IS_HASWELL(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)));
> - igt_require(parser_version >= 7);
> + igt_require(parser_version >= 10);
Oh, that's painful. We should just filter out individual tests.
>
> @@ -501,6 +503,7 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_subtest_group {
> #define REG(R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { #R, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
> +#define REGN(N, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V) { N, R, RMSK, WMSK, INI, V, OK, MIN_V }
> struct test_lri lris[] = {
> /* dummy head pointer */
> REG(OASTATUS2,
> @@ -527,8 +530,19 @@ igt_main
> REG(OACONTROL,
> 0xfffff000, 0x00000000,
> 0xfeed0000, 0x31337000, false, 9),
> + /*
> + * INSTPM is masked and only has 3bits
> + * allowed.
> + */
> + REGN("INSTPM-allowed", INSTPM,
0x000e, 0x000e << 16
> + 0x0000000e, 0x000e0000,
> + 0x00000000, 0x0000000e, true, 10),
> + REGN("INSTPM-disallowed", INSTPM,
> + 0x0000000e, 0x000e0000,
> + 0x00000000, 0x100e100e, false, 10)
So many negative values to test :) At least do
0xffff | 0xffff << 16
0x0000 | 0xffff << 16
for set-all and clear-all
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+
2018-05-18 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: add a register write mask Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_exec_parse: verify that we allow LRI on INSTPM Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 17:10 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2018-05-18 17:14 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 18:14 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Patchwork
2018-05-19 3:40 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2018-05-18 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev
This register should leak between contexts. Documentation says it's
context saved/restored.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
index 4968e367..48291547 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct named_register {
{ "OA_CONTROL", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x2b00 },
{ "PERF_CNT_1", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91b8, 2 },
{ "PERF_CNT_2", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91c0, 2 },
+ { "INSTPM", GEN7, RCS0, 0x20c0 },
/* Privileged (enabled by w/a + FORCE_TO_NONPRIV) */
{ "CTX_PREEMPT", NOCTX /* GEN_RANGE(9, 10) */, RCS0, 0x2248 },
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+ Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 17:14 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 17:15 ` Lionel Landwerlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-05-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin, igt-dev
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-05-18 18:10:43)
> This register should leak between contexts. Documentation says it's
> context saved/restored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> index 4968e367..48291547 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct named_register {
> { "OA_CONTROL", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x2b00 },
> { "PERF_CNT_1", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91b8, 2 },
> { "PERF_CNT_2", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91c0, 2 },
> + { "INSTPM", GEN7, RCS0, 0x20c0 },
It's already in the list, just marked as GEN9+. Let's fix that one :)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+
2018-05-18 17:14 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2018-05-18 17:15 ` Lionel Landwerlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2018-05-18 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, igt-dev
On 18/05/18 18:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-05-18 18:10:43)
>> This register should leak between contexts. Documentation says it's
>> context saved/restored.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
>> index 4968e367..48291547 100644
>> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
>> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct named_register {
>> { "OA_CONTROL", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x2b00 },
>> { "PERF_CNT_1", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91b8, 2 },
>> { "PERF_CNT_2", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91c0, 2 },
>> + { "INSTPM", GEN7, RCS0, 0x20c0 },
> It's already in the list, just marked as GEN9+. Let's fix that one :)
> -Chris
>
Duh!
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register
2018-05-18 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Lionel Landwerlin
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-18 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] test/gem_ctx_isolation: verify INSTPM isolation on Gen7+ Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2018-05-18 18:14 ` Patchwork
2018-05-19 3:40 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-18 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin; +Cc: igt-dev
== Series Details ==
Series: intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43436/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4193 -> IGTPW_1376 =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with IGTPW_1376 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_1376, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43436/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_1376:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic:
fi-pnv-d510: SKIP -> PASS
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_1376 that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
fi-snb-2520m: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103713)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
fi-cfl-s3: FAIL (fdo#103481) -> PASS +1
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
fi-cnl-psr: DMESG-WARN (fdo#104951) -> PASS
fdo#103481 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103481
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fdo#104951 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
== Participating hosts (41 -> 38) ==
Additional (3): fi-kbl-guc fi-cfl-guc fi-snb-2520m
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-bxt-dsi fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-skl-6700hq
== Build changes ==
* IGT: IGT_4485 -> IGTPW_1376
* Piglit: piglit_4485 -> piglit_4487
CI_DRM_4193: 9322e3903ce6c89bde0c24877fe730b808427caf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_1376: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1376/
IGT_4485: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
piglit_4485: 62ef6b0db8967e7021fd3e0b57d03ff164b984fe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
piglit_4487: 6ab75f7eb5e1dccbb773e1739beeb2d7cbd6ad0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Testlist changes ==
+igt@gem_exec_parse@test-lri-instpm-allowed
+igt@gem_exec_parse@test-lri-instpm-disallowed
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1376/issues.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register
2018-05-18 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Lionel Landwerlin
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-18 18:14 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register Patchwork
@ 2018-05-19 3:40 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-19 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin; +Cc: igt-dev
== Series Details ==
Series: intel/gem: test the partial whitelisting of the INSTPM register
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43436/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4485_full -> IGTPW_1376_full =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with IGTPW_1376_full need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_1376_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43436/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_1376_full:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_parse@load-register-reg:
shard-hsw: PASS -> SKIP
igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2:
shard-kbl: SKIP -> PASS
igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-bsd2:
shard-kbl: PASS -> SKIP
igt@gem_pwrite@big-gtt-fbr:
shard-glk: PASS -> SKIP
igt@kms_chv_cursor_fail@pipe-a-64x64-top-edge:
shard-apl: PASS -> SKIP +36
igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-128x128-random:
shard-snb: SKIP -> PASS
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_1376_full that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@gem_eio@execbuf:
shard-glk: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +3
shard-hsw: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +3
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us:
shard-snb: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +3
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate:
shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +2
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-external:
shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523)
igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-128x42-offscreen:
shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#105602, fdo#103558) +17
igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend:
shard-kbl: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103665)
igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105363)
igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)
igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105707)
igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103060) +1
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-y-tiled:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#104724, fdo#103822)
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#103558) +1
igt@kms_setmode@basic:
shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#99912)
igt@pm_rpm@fences-dpms:
shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#105602, fdo#103558) +15
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3:
shard-kbl: INCOMPLETE (fdo#103665) -> PASS +1
igt@gem_eio@hibernate:
shard-hsw: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +3
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-immediate:
shard-apl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +3
shard-snb: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +4
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-internal-immediate:
shard-glk: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +4
igt@gem_eio@wait-wedge-10ms:
shard-kbl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +2
igt@kms_atomic_transition@1x-modeset-transitions-nonblocking:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105703) -> PASS
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#106509) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#100368) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105707) -> PASS +1
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-to-y-tiled:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#104724, fdo#103822) -> PASS
igt@perf_pmu@idle-vcs0:
shard-glk: INCOMPLETE (k.org#198133, fdo#103359) -> PASS
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#103060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103060
fdo#103359 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359
fdo#103558 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103558
fdo#103665 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
fdo#103822 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103822
fdo#104724 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104724
fdo#105363 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363
fdo#105602 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105602
fdo#105703 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105703
fdo#105707 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105707
fdo#106509 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106509
fdo#106523 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106523
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
k.org#198133 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133
== Participating hosts (5 -> 5) ==
No changes in participating hosts
== Build changes ==
* IGT: IGT_4485 -> IGTPW_1376
* Linux: CI_DRM_4191 -> CI_DRM_4193
* Piglit: piglit_4485 -> piglit_4487
CI_DRM_4191: 70daebf1a83c2ed6eff118d2a2806086c0c89027 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
CI_DRM_4193: 9322e3903ce6c89bde0c24877fe730b808427caf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_1376: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1376/
IGT_4485: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
piglit_4485: 62ef6b0db8967e7021fd3e0b57d03ff164b984fe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
piglit_4487: 6ab75f7eb5e1dccbb773e1739beeb2d7cbd6ad0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1376/shards.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread