From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>, "Patel, Chintan M" <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 16:58:11 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180523155811.GO4828@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CABXOdTeCr-ExO9O3XAHK-DnNf5yLGO0TPkXgs60TB90jGNB2_Q@mail.gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --] On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:54:18AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:56 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:54:54PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > And I'm wondering whether we should move these definitions to uapi > > > headers. > > Yes, we should. > Are you sure ? They used to be in > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-tplg-interface.h. > I took my clue from sound/soc/soc-topology.c, where the v4 structures are > also > declared locally and not in the uapi files. I'm saying we should move them there. They're clearly part of the userspace ABI and therefore belong in uapi, it was a mistake to let them be elsewhere. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, "Patel, Chintan M" <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 16:58:11 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180523155811.GO4828@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CABXOdTeCr-ExO9O3XAHK-DnNf5yLGO0TPkXgs60TB90jGNB2_Q@mail.gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --] On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:54:18AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:56 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:54:54PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > And I'm wondering whether we should move these definitions to uapi > > > headers. > > Yes, we should. > Are you sure ? They used to be in > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-tplg-interface.h. > I took my clue from sound/soc/soc-topology.c, where the v4 structures are > also > declared locally and not in the uapi files. I'm saying we should move them there. They're clearly part of the userspace ABI and therefore belong in uapi, it was a mistake to let them be elsewhere. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 15:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-22 16:58 [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files Guenter Roeck 2018-05-22 17:14 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-22 17:14 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-22 19:59 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart 2018-05-22 21:59 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 9:49 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2018-05-23 9:49 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-23 13:15 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 8:24 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2018-05-23 8:24 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-23 13:42 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart 2018-05-23 13:42 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart 2018-05-23 13:56 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 13:56 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 14:49 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 14:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 14:58 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 15:52 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown 2018-05-23 13:54 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 13:54 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-23 13:56 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-23 13:56 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-23 15:54 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2018-05-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-23 16:17 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-24 9:52 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-24 9:52 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-05-24 14:18 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-24 14:18 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-24 14:55 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-24 14:55 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-24 15:11 ` Mark Brown 2018-05-25 9:04 ` [alsa-devel] " Lin, Mengdong 2018-05-25 13:20 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 16:29 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-23 20:28 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart 2018-05-23 21:22 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-24 3:38 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart 2018-05-25 13:40 ` Shreyas NC 2018-05-25 14:09 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-05-25 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180523155811.GO4828@sirena.org.uk \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=chintan.m.patel@intel.com \ --cc=groeck@chromium.org \ --cc=groeck@google.com \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=perex@perex.cz \ --cc=tiwai@suse.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.