All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>, "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] monitor: flush qmp responses when CLOSED
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:58:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180620025811.GA18985@xz-mi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7rqvq60.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Previously we clean up the queues when we got CLOSED event.  It was used
> > to make sure we won't send leftover replies/events of a old client to a
> > new client which makes perfect sense. However this will also drop the
> > replies/events even if the output port of the previous chardev backend
> > is still open, which can lead to missing of the last replies/events.
> > Now this patch does an extra operation to flush the response queue
> > before cleaning up.
> >
> > In most cases, a QMP session will be based on a bidirectional channel (a
> > TCP port, for example, we read/write to the same socket handle), so in
> > port and out port of the backend chardev are fundamentally the same
> > port. In these cases, it does not really matter much on whether we'll
> > flush the response queue since flushing will fail anyway.  However there
> > can be cases where in & out ports of the QMP monitor's backend chardev
> > are separated.  Here is an example:
> >
> >   cat $QMP_COMMANDS | qemu -qmp stdio ... | filter_commands
> >
> > In this case, the backend is fd-typed, and it is connected to stdio
> > where in port is stdin and out port is stdout.  Now if we drop all the
> > events on the response queue then filter_command process might miss some
> > events that it might expect.  The thing is that, when stdin closes,
> > stdout might still be there alive!
> >
> > In practice, I encountered SHUTDOWN event missing when running test with
> > iotest 087 with Out-Of-Band enabled.  Here is one of the ways that this
> > can happen (after "quit" command is executed and QEMU quits the main
> > loop):
> >
> > 1. [main thread] QEMU queues a SHUTDOWN event into response queue.
> >
> > 2. "cat" terminates (to distinguish it from the animal, I quote it).
> >
> > 3. [monitor iothread] QEMU's monitor iothread reads EOF from stdin.
> >
> > 4. [monitor iothread] QEMU's monitor iothread calls the CLOSED event
> >    hook for the monitor, which will destroy the response queue of the
> >    monitor, then the SHUTDOWN event is dropped.
> >
> > 5. [main thread] QEMU's main thread cleans up the monitors in
> >    monitor_cleanup().  When trying to flush pending responses, it sees
> >    nothing.  SHUTDOWN is lost forever.
> >
> > Note that before the monitor iothread was introduced, step [4]/[5] could
> > never happen since the main loop was the only place to detect the EOF
> > event of stdin and run the CLOSED event hooks.  Now things can happen in
> > parallel in the iothread.
> >
> > Without this patch, iotest 087 will have ~10% chance to miss the
> > SHUTDOWN event and fail when with Out-Of-Band enabled (the output is
> > manually touched up to suite line width requirement):
> 
> I wouldn't wrap lines when quoting a diff.
> 
> >
> > --- /home/peterx/git/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/087.out
> > +++ /home/peterx/git/qemu/bin/tests/qemu-iotests/087.out.bad
> > @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
> >  {"return": {}}
> >  {"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "'node-name' must be
> >   specified for the root node"}}
> >  {"return": {}}
> > -{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP},
> > - "event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false}}
> >
> >  === Duplicate ID ===
> > @@ -53,7 +52,6 @@
> >  {"return": {}}
> >  {"return": {}}
> >  {"return": {}}
> >
> > -{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP},
> > - "event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false}}
> 
> Please indent the quoted diff a bit, so make it more obviously not part
> of the patch.  In fact, git-am chokes on it for me.

To make it even simpler, I plan to remove the whole chunk of the diff
from the commit message if you won't disagree.

> 
> >
> > This patch fixes the problem.
> >
> > Fixes: 6d2d563f8c ("qmp: cleanup qmp queues properly", 2018-03-27)
> > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  monitor.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index d4a463f707..c9a02ee40c 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -512,6 +512,27 @@ struct QMPResponse {
> >  };
> >  typedef struct QMPResponse QMPResponse;
> >  
> > +static QObject *monitor_qmp_response_pop_one(Monitor *mon)
> > +{
> > +    QObject *data;
> > +
> > +    qemu_mutex_lock(&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);
> > +    data = g_queue_pop_head(mon->qmp.qmp_responses);
> > +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);
> > +
> > +    return data;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void monitor_qmp_response_flush(Monitor *mon)
> > +{
> > +    QObject *data;
> > +
> > +    while ((data = monitor_qmp_response_pop_one(mon))) {
> > +        monitor_json_emitter_raw(mon, data);
> > +        qobject_unref(data);
> > +    }
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Pop a QMPResponse from any monitor's response queue into @response.
> >   * Return false if all the queues are empty; else true.
> > @@ -523,9 +544,7 @@ static bool monitor_qmp_response_pop_any(QMPResponse *response)
> >  
> >      qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
> >      QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) {
> > -        qemu_mutex_lock(&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);
> > -        data = g_queue_pop_head(mon->qmp.qmp_responses);
> > -        qemu_mutex_unlock(&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);
> > +        data = monitor_qmp_response_pop_one(mon);
> >          if (data) {
> >              response->mon = mon;
> >              response->data = data;
> > @@ -4364,6 +4383,14 @@ static void monitor_qmp_event(void *opaque, int event)
> >          mon_refcount++;
> >          break;
> >      case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> > +        /*
> > +         * Note: this is only useful when the output of the chardev
> > +         * backend is still open.  For example, when the backend is
> > +         * stdio, it's possible that stdout is still open when stdin
> > +         * is closed.  After all, CHR_EVENT_CLOSED event is currently
> > +         * only bound to stdin.
> > +         */
> 
> I'm not sure I get the last sentence.  What do you mean by "bound to
> stdin"?

I want to express that the event is only related to the state of
stdin, meanwhile it's never related to the state of stdout.  How about
I remove the sentence after "after all"?  I think it's clear enough
with the rest of the comments.

> 
> > +        monitor_qmp_response_flush(mon);
> >          monitor_qmp_cleanup_queues(mon);
> >          json_message_parser_destroy(&mon->qmp.parser);
> >          json_message_parser_init(&mon->qmp.parser, handle_qmp_command);

Regards,

-- 
Peter Xu

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-20  2:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] monitor: enable OOB by default Peter Xu
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] chardev: comment details for CLOSED event Peter Xu
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] monitor: rename *_pop_one to *_pop_any Peter Xu
2018-06-19 11:48   ` Eric Blake
2018-06-19 13:44   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] monitor: flush qmp responses when CLOSED Peter Xu
2018-06-19  5:53   ` Peter Xu
2018-06-19 13:55     ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  3:04       ` Peter Xu
2018-06-19 13:53   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  2:58     ` Peter Xu [this message]
2018-06-20  7:17       ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/7] tests: iotests: drop some stderr line Peter Xu
2018-06-19 13:57   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  3:06     ` Peter Xu
2018-06-20  7:12       ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  7:21         ` Peter Xu
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/7] docs: mention shared state protect for OOB Peter Xu
2018-06-19 13:59   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] monitor: remove "x-oob", turn oob on by default Peter Xu
2018-06-19 14:16   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  3:15     ` Peter Xu
2018-06-20  7:20       ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-20  7:28         ` Peter Xu
2018-06-19  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] Revert "tests: Add parameter to qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake" Peter Xu
2018-06-19 14:20   ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-19  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] monitor: enable OOB by default Thomas Huth
2018-06-19  6:03   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180620025811.GA18985@xz-mi \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.