From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched.load_balance flag to v2 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:46:13 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180620144613.GP2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <54c607c3-e742-4da9-c89a-4ed54146e3bd@redhat.com> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:42:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Thinking about isolcpus emulation, I now realize that it is more than > just disabling load balancing. it also disables some kernel threads like > kworker from running so that an userspace application can monopolize as > much of a cpu as possible. Disabling kernel threads from running isn't > that hard if it is only done once at boot time. it is trickier if we > have to do it at run time. Don't think it is all that difficult, we just need a notifier for when that housekeeping thing changes and ensure that everybody who uses it re-evaluates crap. > Without good isolcpus emulation, disabling load balance kind of loses > its usefulness. So I am going to take out the load_balance flag for now > unless I hear objection otherwise. I'm not seeing the direct link between the load_balance flag and isolcpus emulation in the proposed stuff. We can tie the housekeeping mask to whatever CPUs remain in the root cgroup, couple that to that notifier and it should all just work I think.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched.load_balance flag to v2 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:46:13 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180620144613.GP2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <54c607c3-e742-4da9-c89a-4ed54146e3bd@redhat.com> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:42:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Thinking about isolcpus emulation, I now realize that it is more than > just disabling load balancing. it also disables some kernel threads like > kworker from running so that an userspace application can monopolize as > much of a cpu as possible. Disabling kernel threads from running isn't > that hard if it is only done once at boot time. it is trickier if we > have to do it at run time. Don't think it is all that difficult, we just need a notifier for when that housekeeping thing changes and ensure that everybody who uses it re-evaluates crap. > Without good isolcpus emulation, disabling load balance kind of loses > its usefulness. So I am going to take out the load_balance flag for now > unless I hear objection otherwise. I'm not seeing the direct link between the load_balance flag and isolcpus emulation in the proposed stuff. We can tie the housekeeping mask to whatever CPUs remain in the root cgroup, couple that to that notifier and it should all just work I think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 14:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-29 13:41 [PATCH v9 0/7] Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] cpuset: " Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.domain_root flag Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 14:18 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 14:18 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 14:57 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 14:57 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched.load_balance flag to v2 Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 13:36 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 13:36 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 13:54 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 13:54 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 15:36 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 15:36 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-05-31 16:42 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-31 16:42 ` Waiman Long 2018-06-20 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2018-06-20 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-06-21 7:40 ` Waiman Long 2018-06-21 7:40 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize isolated_cpus Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] cpuset: Don't rebuild sched domains if cpu changes in non-domain root Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] cpuset: Allow reporting of sched domain generation info Waiman Long 2018-05-29 13:41 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 10:13 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 12:56 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 12:56 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 13:05 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 13:05 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 13:47 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 13:47 ` Waiman Long 2018-05-30 13:52 ` Juri Lelli 2018-05-30 13:52 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180620144613.GP2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=efault@gmx.de \ --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=guro@fb.com \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \ --cc=longman@redhat.com \ --cc=luto@amacapital.net \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \ --cc=pjt@google.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.