All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lkp@01.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] net: remove sock_poll_busy_loop
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:20:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628142059.10017-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628142059.10017-1-hch@lst.de>

There is no point in hiding this logic in a helper.  Also remove the
useless events != 0 check, and reorder the remaining ones so that the
cheaper test comes first.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 ---------
 net/socket.c            | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index 4a459a0d70d1..71c72a939bf8 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -121,15 +121,6 @@ static inline void sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void sock_poll_busy_loop(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
-{
-	if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) &&
-	    events && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP)) {
-		/* once, only if requested by syscall */
-		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
-	}
-}
-
 /* used in the NIC receive handler to mark the skb */
 static inline void skb_mark_napi_id(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				    struct napi_struct *napi)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index ca300c97b7ba..4354afe8ad96 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,9 @@ static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
 	__poll_t events = poll_requested_events(wait), mask = 0;
 
-	sock_poll_busy_loop(sock, events);
+	/* poll once if requested by the syscall */
+	if ((events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP) && sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk))
+		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
 
 	if (sock->ops->poll) {
 		mask = sock->ops->poll(file, sock, wait);
-- 
2.17.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] net: remove sock_poll_busy_loop
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:20:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628142059.10017-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628142059.10017-1-hch@lst.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]

There is no point in hiding this logic in a helper.  Also remove the
useless events != 0 check, and reorder the remaining ones so that the
cheaper test comes first.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 ---------
 net/socket.c            | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index 4a459a0d70d1..71c72a939bf8 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -121,15 +121,6 @@ static inline void sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void sock_poll_busy_loop(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
-{
-	if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) &&
-	    events && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP)) {
-		/* once, only if requested by syscall */
-		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
-	}
-}
-
 /* used in the NIC receive handler to mark the skb */
 static inline void skb_mark_napi_id(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				    struct napi_struct *napi)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index ca300c97b7ba..4354afe8ad96 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,9 @@ static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
 	__poll_t events = poll_requested_events(wait), mask = 0;
 
-	sock_poll_busy_loop(sock, events);
+	/* poll once if requested by the syscall */
+	if ((events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP) && sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk))
+		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
 
 	if (sock->ops->poll) {
 		mask = sock->ops->poll(file, sock, wait);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28 14:20 [RFC] replace ->get_poll_head with a waitqueue pointer in struct file Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] net: remove sock_poll_busy_flag Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] net: remove bogus RCU annotations on socket.wq Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] net: don't detour through struct to find the poll head Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] net: remove busy polling from sock_get_poll_head Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-06-28 14:20   ` [PATCH 5/6] net: remove sock_poll_busy_loop Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] fs: replace f_ops->get_poll_head with a static ->f_poll_head pointer Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-28 16:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 16:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 18:17     ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 18:17       ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 19:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 19:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 20:28         ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 20:28           ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 20:37           ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 20:37             ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 21:16             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 21:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 21:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 21:11             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 21:30             ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 21:30               ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 21:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 21:39                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 22:20               ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 22:20                 ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 22:35                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 22:35                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 22:49                   ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 22:49                     ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 22:55                     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 22:55                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 23:37                       ` Al Viro
2018-06-28 23:37                         ` Al Viro
2018-06-29  0:13                         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-29  0:13                           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-29 13:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-29 13:29                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-29 13:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-29 13:40                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-29 13:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-29 13:28               ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180628142059.10017-6-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.