From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:07:51 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181010120751.GP30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATaD=G8BW316fkBWM2A+YXgP5tabaySR2Fs49Za_0p=3Q@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 08:07:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a bunch of vendor (or SoC) names in > Documentation/device/bindings/arm/ > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mrvl > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/npcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32 > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ux500 > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500 These are for arch/arm/mach-* and are the DT root descriptions for the various boards and SoCs. > I also see some vendor names in > Documentation/device/bindings/soc/ > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte These are for individual drivers in drivers/soc/ > Confusingly, I see bcm, mediatek, rockchip > in both locations. Correct, because one is for the SoC and board as a whole, the other is for some subset of the SoC handled via drivers/soc - for example, with Broadcom, there's a Raspberry PI power domain driver in drivers/soc, which is described by Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt whereas Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm2835.txt describes the bindings for the root DT node BCM2835 as used on the Raspberry Pi amongst other boards. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:07:51 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181010120751.GP30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATaD=G8BW316fkBWM2A+YXgP5tabaySR2Fs49Za_0p=3Q@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 08:07:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a bunch of vendor (or SoC) names in > Documentation/device/bindings/arm/ > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mrvl > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/npcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32 > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ux500 > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500 These are for arch/arm/mach-* and are the DT root descriptions for the various boards and SoCs. > I also see some vendor names in > Documentation/device/bindings/soc/ > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte These are for individual drivers in drivers/soc/ > Confusingly, I see bcm, mediatek, rockchip > in both locations. Correct, because one is for the SoC and board as a whole, the other is for some subset of the SoC handled via drivers/soc - for example, with Broadcom, there's a Raspberry PI power domain driver in drivers/soc, which is described by Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt whereas Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm2835.txt describes the bindings for the root DT node BCM2835 as used on the Raspberry Pi amongst other boards. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 12:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-10 11:07 [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Masahiro Yamada 2018-10-10 11:07 ` Masahiro Yamada 2018-10-10 11:19 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 11:19 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 12:04 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:04 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message] 2018-10-10 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 15:01 ` Masahiro Yamada 2018-10-10 15:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181010120751.GP30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \ --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.