From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> To: DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Subject: [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:07:52 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAK7LNATaD=G8BW316fkBWM2A+YXgP5tabaySR2Fs49Za_0p=3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hi, I see a bunch of vendor (or SoC) names in Documentation/device/bindings/arm/ ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mrvl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/npcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ux500 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500 I also see some vendor names in Documentation/device/bindings/soc/ ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte Confusingly, I see bcm, mediatek, rockchip in both locations. Is there any rule to choose one than the other? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com (Masahiro Yamada) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:07:52 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAK7LNATaD=G8BW316fkBWM2A+YXgP5tabaySR2Fs49Za_0p=3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hi, I see a bunch of vendor (or SoC) names in Documentation/device/bindings/arm/ ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mrvl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/npcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ux500 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500 I also see some vendor names in Documentation/device/bindings/soc/ ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte Confusingly, I see bcm, mediatek, rockchip in both locations. Is there any rule to choose one than the other? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 11:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-10 11:07 Masahiro Yamada [this message] 2018-10-10 11:07 ` [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding Masahiro Yamada 2018-10-10 11:19 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 11:19 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 12:04 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:04 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 12:16 ` Stefan Wahren 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 18:59 ` Rob Herring 2018-10-10 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-10-10 15:01 ` Masahiro Yamada 2018-10-10 15:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAK7LNATaD=G8BW316fkBWM2A+YXgP5tabaySR2Fs49Za_0p=3Q@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.