From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret() Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:54:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190109135435.178664-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190109135435.178664-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Until now, we haven't differentiated between HYP calls that have a return value and those who don't. As we're about to change this, introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret(), and change all call sites that actually make use of a return value. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h index ca56537b61bc..023c9f2b1eea 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -214,7 +214,10 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *indices); int kvm_arm_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg); int kvm_arm_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg); + unsigned long kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...); +#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__) + void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask); int __kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_events *events); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 7732d0ba4e60..e54cb7c88a4e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm); u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...); #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__) +#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__) void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask); void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c index f39801e4136c..fd917d6d12af 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void restore_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) { - __this_cpu_write(mdcr_el2, kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_get_mdcr_el2)); + __this_cpu_write(mdcr_el2, kvm_call_hyp_ret(__kvm_get_mdcr_el2)); } /** diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index 9e350fd34504..4d55f98f97f7 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) ret = kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(vcpu); kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(); } else { - ret = kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe, vcpu); + ret = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe, vcpu); } vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE; diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c index 9c0dd234ebe8..67f98151c88d 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ early_param("kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable", early_gicv4_enable); */ int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info) { - u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2); + u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2); int ret; /* @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ void vgic_v3_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3; if (likely(cpu_if->vgic_sre)) - cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_read_vmcr); + cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__vgic_v3_read_vmcr); kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_save_aprs, vcpu); -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret() Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:54:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190109135435.178664-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190109135435.178664-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Until now, we haven't differentiated between HYP calls that have a return value and those who don't. As we're about to change this, introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret(), and change all call sites that actually make use of a return value. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h index ca56537b61bc..023c9f2b1eea 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -214,7 +214,10 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *indices); int kvm_arm_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg); int kvm_arm_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg); + unsigned long kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...); +#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__) + void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask); int __kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_events *events); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 7732d0ba4e60..e54cb7c88a4e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm); u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...); #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__) +#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__) void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask); void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c index f39801e4136c..fd917d6d12af 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void restore_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) { - __this_cpu_write(mdcr_el2, kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_get_mdcr_el2)); + __this_cpu_write(mdcr_el2, kvm_call_hyp_ret(__kvm_get_mdcr_el2)); } /** diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index 9e350fd34504..4d55f98f97f7 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) ret = kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(vcpu); kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(); } else { - ret = kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe, vcpu); + ret = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe, vcpu); } vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE; diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c index 9c0dd234ebe8..67f98151c88d 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ early_param("kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable", early_gicv4_enable); */ int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info) { - u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2); + u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2); int ret; /* @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ void vgic_v3_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3; if (likely(cpu_if->vgic_sre)) - cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_read_vmcr); + cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__vgic_v3_read_vmcr); kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_save_aprs, vcpu); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 13:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-09 13:54 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: Allow direct function calls on VHE Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier [this message] 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret() Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: Allow for direct call of HYP functions when using VHE Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:24 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:24 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:45 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:45 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:51 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:51 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:52 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:52 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 16:01 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 16:01 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 16:04 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 16:04 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: Drop VHE-specific HYP call stub Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: Allow direct function calls on VHE Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:11 ` Andrew Murray
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190109135435.178664-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.