From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: Drop VHE-specific HYP call stub Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:54:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190109135435.178664-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190109135435.178664-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> We now call VHE code directly, without going through any central dispatching function. Let's drop that code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S | 3 --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S | 12 ------------ 2 files changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S index 952f6cb9cf72..2845aa680841 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ * arch/arm64/kernel/hyp_stub.S. */ ENTRY(__kvm_call_hyp) -alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN hvc #0 ret -alternative_else_nop_endif - b __vhe_hyp_call ENDPROC(__kvm_call_hyp) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S index 73c1b483ec39..2b1e686772bf 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S @@ -43,18 +43,6 @@ ldr lr, [sp], #16 .endm -ENTRY(__vhe_hyp_call) - do_el2_call - /* - * We used to rely on having an exception return to get - * an implicit isb. In the E2H case, we don't have it anymore. - * rather than changing all the leaf functions, just do it here - * before returning to the rest of the kernel. - */ - isb - ret -ENDPROC(__vhe_hyp_call) - el1_sync: // Guest trapped into EL2 mrs x0, esr_el2 -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: Drop VHE-specific HYP call stub Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:54:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190109135435.178664-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190109135435.178664-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> We now call VHE code directly, without going through any central dispatching function. Let's drop that code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S | 3 --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S | 12 ------------ 2 files changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S index 952f6cb9cf72..2845aa680841 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ * arch/arm64/kernel/hyp_stub.S. */ ENTRY(__kvm_call_hyp) -alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN hvc #0 ret -alternative_else_nop_endif - b __vhe_hyp_call ENDPROC(__kvm_call_hyp) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S index 73c1b483ec39..2b1e686772bf 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S @@ -43,18 +43,6 @@ ldr lr, [sp], #16 .endm -ENTRY(__vhe_hyp_call) - do_el2_call - /* - * We used to rely on having an exception return to get - * an implicit isb. In the E2H case, we don't have it anymore. - * rather than changing all the leaf functions, just do it here - * before returning to the rest of the kernel. - */ - isb - ret -ENDPROC(__vhe_hyp_call) - el1_sync: // Guest trapped into EL2 mrs x0, esr_el2 -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 13:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-09 13:54 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: Allow direct function calls on VHE Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret() Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: Allow for direct call of HYP functions when using VHE Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:24 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:24 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:45 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:45 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:51 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:51 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:52 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 14:52 ` Julien Thierry 2019-01-09 16:01 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 16:01 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 16:04 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 16:04 ` Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier [this message] 2019-01-09 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: Drop VHE-specific HYP call stub Marc Zyngier 2019-01-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: Allow direct function calls on VHE Andrew Murray 2019-01-09 14:11 ` Andrew Murray
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190109135435.178664-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.