From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: UBIFS quota support Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:44:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190110114448.vcx6w76ibmxwvlh3@pengutronix.de> (raw) Hi all, I'm currently working on resurrecting the UBIFS quota patches posted back in 2015 by Dongsheng Yang, last posted here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-September/061812.html First of all I think work stopped there, there is no newer UBIFS quota support I am missing, right? One problem with this series was that the quotactl systemcall expects a path to a block device. UBIFS doesn't work on a block device but on a character device instead. The solution in this series was to pass the path to the cdev in quotactl. A struct cdev * member was added to struct super_block which was used to identify the superblock for a given cdev. This approach was rejected by Christoph ("I don't think the cdev has any business in core VFS code."). Apart from that UBIFS can not only be mounted with a path to the character device (mount -t ubifs /dev/ubix_y /mnt) but also in the form ubix:volname (mount -t ubifs ubix:volname /mnt) in which case userspace doesn't have any valid path it could pass in quotactl. An idea out of this would be to allow to pass the mountpoint instead of the path to the block device in quotactl which would work with nfs or even tmpfs aswell. Would that be acceptable? Any other ideas? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: UBIFS quota support Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:44:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190110114448.vcx6w76ibmxwvlh3@pengutronix.de> (raw) Message-ID: <20190110114448.oNRoB8ZebFcGJvxxH23Of31NEKdZI6hXrMdrO1ED3kQ@z> (raw) Hi all, I'm currently working on resurrecting the UBIFS quota patches posted back in 2015 by Dongsheng Yang, last posted here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-September/061812.html First of all I think work stopped there, there is no newer UBIFS quota support I am missing, right? One problem with this series was that the quotactl systemcall expects a path to a block device. UBIFS doesn't work on a block device but on a character device instead. The solution in this series was to pass the path to the cdev in quotactl. A struct cdev * member was added to struct super_block which was used to identify the superblock for a given cdev. This approach was rejected by Christoph ("I don't think the cdev has any business in core VFS code."). Apart from that UBIFS can not only be mounted with a path to the character device (mount -t ubifs /dev/ubix_y /mnt) but also in the form ubix:volname (mount -t ubifs ubix:volname /mnt) in which case userspace doesn't have any valid path it could pass in quotactl. An idea out of this would be to allow to pass the mountpoint instead of the path to the block device in quotactl which would work with nfs or even tmpfs aswell. Would that be acceptable? Any other ideas? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 11:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-10 11:44 Sascha Hauer [this message] 2019-01-10 11:44 ` UBIFS quota support Sascha Hauer 2019-01-22 23:07 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-22 23:07 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-23 9:43 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-23 9:43 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-23 9:46 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-23 9:46 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-23 9:55 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-23 9:55 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-23 10:47 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-23 10:47 ` Richard Weinberger 2019-01-23 15:47 ` Jan Kara 2019-01-23 15:47 ` Jan Kara 2019-01-25 9:21 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-25 9:21 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-28 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-01-28 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-01-30 12:45 ` Jan Kara 2019-01-30 12:45 ` Jan Kara 2019-01-31 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer 2019-01-31 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190110114448.vcx6w76ibmxwvlh3@pengutronix.de \ --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \ --cc=hch@infradead.org \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=richard@nod.at \ --cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.