All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225094659.741bf42f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1907 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> But do they need SOBs?

I think so, since they modify the code ..

> The DCO says:
> 
> By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
> 
>         (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
>             have the right to submit it under the open source license
>             indicated in the file; or
> 
>         (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
>             of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
>             license and I have the right under that license to submit that
>             work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
>             by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
>             permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
>             in the file; or
> 
>         (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
>             person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
>             it.
> 
>         (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
>             are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
>             personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
>             maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
>             this project or the open source license(s) involved.
> 
> 
> Only d) really applies to a revert, and as the maintainer I feel like d)
> is kind of implied.

I read this as (a || b || c) && d.  And if there is no SOB, then none
of the above is certified.

> Anyway I'll try and remember to do it in future if that's The Rule ;)

Its just as effective as the rest of our rules ... i.e. a strong
suggestion :-)

Thanks
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225094659.741bf42f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1907 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> But do they need SOBs?

I think so, since they modify the code ..

> The DCO says:
> 
> By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
> 
>         (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
>             have the right to submit it under the open source license
>             indicated in the file; or
> 
>         (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
>             of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
>             license and I have the right under that license to submit that
>             work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
>             by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
>             permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
>             in the file; or
> 
>         (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
>             person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
>             it.
> 
>         (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
>             are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
>             personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
>             maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
>             this project or the open source license(s) involved.
> 
> 
> Only d) really applies to a revert, and as the maintainer I feel like d)
> is kind of implied.

I read this as (a || b || c) && d.  And if there is no SOB, then none
of the above is certified.

> Anyway I'll try and remember to do it in future if that's The Rule ;)

Its just as effective as the rest of our rules ... i.e. a strong
suggestion :-)

Thanks
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-24 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-23 14:05 linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-24 11:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-24 22:47   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2019-02-24 22:47     ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-23 21:16 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-23 21:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-24  3:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-24  3:57   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-05-19 22:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-19 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-20  5:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-05-20  5:20   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-21 21:46 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-21 21:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-24  7:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-24  7:42   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-06 20:35 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-06 20:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-03 18:26 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-14 20:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-15 10:11 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190225094659.741bf42f@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.