* [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
features:
- I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
- resistive touchscreen controller,
- IDD measurement.
I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
registers STMFX features MFD children.
---
Changes in v4:
- mfd: move registers #define into the header
- mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
- mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
- mfd: fix typos
- mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
- pinctrl: rework registers #define
- dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Changes in v3:
- fix MFD interrupt bindings
- fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
in this function
Changes in v2:
- move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
- improve regmap configuration
- take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
Amelie Delaunay (9):
dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
features:
- I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
- resistive touchscreen controller,
- IDD measurement.
I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
registers STMFX features MFD children.
---
Changes in v4:
- mfd: move registers #define into the header
- mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
- mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
- mfd: fix typos
- mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
- pinctrl: rework registers #define
- dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Changes in v3:
- fix MFD interrupt bindings
- fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
in this function
Changes in v2:
- move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
- improve regmap configuration
- take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
Amelie Delaunay (9):
dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+ Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+ vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+ };
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+ Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+ vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+ };
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+ Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+ vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+ };
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 23:55 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 23:55 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, Alexandre Torgue,
Linus Walleij, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin,
Lee Jones, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 23:55 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
2019-02-27 23:55 ` Rob Herring
(?)
@ 2019-02-28 8:53 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
identical to v3.
I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 8:53 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
identical to v3.
I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 8:53 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
identical to v3.
I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
2019-02-28 8:53 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
(?)
@ 2019-02-28 14:41 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:41 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:41 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
2019-02-28 14:41 ` Rob Herring
(?)
@ 2019-02-28 14:59 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
>
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
>
> Rob
>
Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.
Regards,
Amelie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:59 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
>
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
>
> Rob
>
Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.
Regards,
Amelie
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:59 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
>
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
>
> Rob
>
Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.
Regards,
Amelie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called stpmic1.
+config MFD_STMFX
+ tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+ depends on I2C
+ depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+ select MFD_CORE
+ select REGMAP_I2C
+ help
+ Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+ This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+ additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+ of the device.
+
menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
depends on ARCH_SA1100
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC) += mxs-lradc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC) += sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX) += rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) += stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = 0;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u32 sys_ctrl;
+ u8 mask;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+ * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+ * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+ * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+ */
+ if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .irq_bus_lock = stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+ .irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+ .irq_mask = stmfx_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+ unsigned long n, pending;
+ u32 ack;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+ (u32 *)&pending);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ /*
+ * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+ * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+ */
+ ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+ if (ack) {
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+ irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+ irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+ .map = stmfx_irq_map,
+ .unmap = stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ int hwirq;
+
+ for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+ irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+ irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+ &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+ if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+ irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+ if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+ (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+ NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+ irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ "stmfx", stmfx);
+ if (ret)
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 id;
+ u8 version[2];
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+ * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+ * client->addr is shifted.
+ *
+ * STMFX_I2C_ADDR| STMFX | Linux
+ * input pin | I2C device address | I2C device address
+ *---------------------------------------------------------
+ * 0 | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 | 0x42
+ * 1 | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 | 0x43
+ */
+ if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+ version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+ id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+ .name = "stmfx-idd",
+ .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+ .name = "stmfx-ts",
+ .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+ },
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ switch (reg) {
+ case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .reg_stride = 1,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
+ .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
+ .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!stmfx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+ stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+ stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+ ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (client->irq < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+ ret = client->irq;
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+ stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+ stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+ 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_irq_exit;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+ stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+ &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+ "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+ .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID 0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB 0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB 0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL 0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN 0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN 0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING 0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK 0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2 0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3 0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2 0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3 0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2 0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2 0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2 0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3 0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2 0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3 0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX 0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO = BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW = BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_TS = BIT(3),
+ STMFX_FUNC_IDD = BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device: device reference used for logs
+ * @map: register map
+ * @vdd: STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain: IRQ domain
+ * @lock: IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src: cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl: backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin: backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regulator *vdd;
+ struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+ u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called stpmic1.
+config MFD_STMFX
+ tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+ depends on I2C
+ depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+ select MFD_CORE
+ select REGMAP_I2C
+ help
+ Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+ This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+ additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+ of the device.
+
menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
depends on ARCH_SA1100
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC) += mxs-lradc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC) += sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX) += rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) += stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = 0;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u32 sys_ctrl;
+ u8 mask;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+ * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+ * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+ * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+ */
+ if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .irq_bus_lock = stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+ .irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+ .irq_mask = stmfx_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+ unsigned long n, pending;
+ u32 ack;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+ (u32 *)&pending);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ /*
+ * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+ * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+ */
+ ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+ if (ack) {
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+ irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+ irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+ .map = stmfx_irq_map,
+ .unmap = stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ int hwirq;
+
+ for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+ irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+ irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+ &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+ if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+ irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+ if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+ (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+ NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+ irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ "stmfx", stmfx);
+ if (ret)
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 id;
+ u8 version[2];
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+ * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+ * client->addr is shifted.
+ *
+ * STMFX_I2C_ADDR| STMFX | Linux
+ * input pin | I2C device address | I2C device address
+ *---------------------------------------------------------
+ * 0 | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 | 0x42
+ * 1 | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 | 0x43
+ */
+ if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+ version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+ id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+ .name = "stmfx-idd",
+ .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+ .name = "stmfx-ts",
+ .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+ },
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ switch (reg) {
+ case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .reg_stride = 1,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
+ .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
+ .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!stmfx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+ stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+ stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+ ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (client->irq < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+ ret = client->irq;
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+ stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+ stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+ 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_irq_exit;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+ stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+ &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+ "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+ .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID 0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB 0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB 0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL 0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN 0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN 0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING 0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK 0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2 0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3 0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2 0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3 0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2 0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2 0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2 0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3 0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2 0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3 0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX 0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO = BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW = BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_TS = BIT(3),
+ STMFX_FUNC_IDD = BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device: device reference used for logs
+ * @map: register map
+ * @vdd: STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain: IRQ domain
+ * @lock: IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src: cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl: backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin: backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regulator *vdd;
+ struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+ u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called stpmic1.
+config MFD_STMFX
+ tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+ depends on I2C
+ depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+ select MFD_CORE
+ select REGMAP_I2C
+ help
+ Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+ This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+ additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+ of the device.
+
menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
depends on ARCH_SA1100
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC) += mxs-lradc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC) += sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX) += rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) += stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = 0;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+ if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+ mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u32 sys_ctrl;
+ u8 mask;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+ * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+ * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+ * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+ */
+ if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+ if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+ (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+ u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+ return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .irq_bus_lock = stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+ .irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+ .irq_mask = stmfx_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+ unsigned long n, pending;
+ u32 ack;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+ (u32 *)&pending);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ /*
+ * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+ * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+ */
+ ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+ if (ack) {
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+ irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+ irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+ irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+ .map = stmfx_irq_map,
+ .unmap = stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ int hwirq;
+
+ for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+ irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+ irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+ &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+ if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+ irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+ if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+ (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+ NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+ irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ "stmfx", stmfx);
+ if (ret)
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ u32 id;
+ u8 version[2];
+ int ret;
+
+ stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&client->dev,
+ "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+ * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+ * client->addr is shifted.
+ *
+ * STMFX_I2C_ADDR| STMFX | Linux
+ * input pin | I2C device address | I2C device address
+ *---------------------------------------------------------
+ * 0 | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 | 0x42
+ * 1 | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 | 0x43
+ */
+ if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+ version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+ id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+ regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+ return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+ .name = "stmfx-idd",
+ .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+ },
+ {
+ .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+ .name = "stmfx-ts",
+ .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+ },
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ switch (reg) {
+ case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+ case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+ case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .reg_stride = 1,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
+ .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
+ .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!stmfx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+ stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+ stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+ ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (client->irq < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+ ret = client->irq;
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_chip_exit;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+ stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+ stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+ 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_irq_exit;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+ stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+ return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+ &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+ &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+ sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+ &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+ ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+ "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-core",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+ .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID 0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB 0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB 0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL 0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN 0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN 0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING 0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK 0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2 0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3 0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2 0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3 0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2 0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2 0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2 0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3 0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2 0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3 0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX 0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO = BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW = BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+ STMFX_FUNC_TS = BIT(3),
+ STMFX_FUNC_IDD = BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device: device reference used for logs
+ * @map: register map
+ * @vdd: STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain: IRQ domain
+ * @lock: IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src: cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl: backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin: backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regulator *vdd;
+ struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+ u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
@ 2019-04-03 10:01 ` Lee Jones
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-03 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
> STMFX functions are not used
> - Main MCU IDD measurement
> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
Just a couple of nits below.
[...]
> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u32 id;
> + u8 version[2];
> + int ret;
> +
> + stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&client->dev,
> + "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
stmfx->vdd = NULL;
} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
}
if (stmfx->vdd) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
[...]
> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
> +};
Please move everything from here --------------->
> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
> + .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
> + .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
> + },
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
> + .name = "stmfx-idd",
> + .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
> + },
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
> + .name = "stmfx-ts",
> + .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .reg_stride = 1,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
> + .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
> + .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> +};
----------------------->
... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct stmfx *stmfx;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!stmfx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
> +
> + stmfx->dev = dev;
> +
> + stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
> +
> + ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (client->irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
> + ret = client->irq;
> + goto err_chip_exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_chip_exit;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
> + stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
> + stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
> + }
Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
...
Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()? That
does exactly the same thing. So you can get this back from the client
via i2c_get_clientdata(). No need to send it though platform data.
> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> + stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
> + 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_irq_exit;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_irq_exit:
> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +err_chip_exit:
> + stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +
> + return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
> + &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
Don't think you need a separate function for this. Just move the
regmap_raw_write() commands here.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev,
> + "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
As above.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "stmfx-core",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
> + .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
> + },
> + .probe = stmfx_probe,
> + .remove = stmfx_remove,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
[...]
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-03 10:01 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-03 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre Torgue, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
> STMFX functions are not used
> - Main MCU IDD measurement
> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
Just a couple of nits below.
[...]
> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u32 id;
> + u8 version[2];
> + int ret;
> +
> + stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&client->dev,
> + "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
stmfx->vdd = NULL;
} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
}
if (stmfx->vdd) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
[...]
> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
> +};
Please move everything from here --------------->
> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
> + .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
> + .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
> + },
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
> + .name = "stmfx-idd",
> + .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
> + },
> + {
> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
> + .name = "stmfx-ts",
> + .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .reg_stride = 1,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
> + .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
> + .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> +};
----------------------->
... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct stmfx *stmfx;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!stmfx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
> +
> + stmfx->dev = dev;
> +
> + stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
> +
> + ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (client->irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
> + ret = client->irq;
> + goto err_chip_exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_chip_exit;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
> + stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
> + stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
> + }
Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
...
Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()? That
does exactly the same thing. So you can get this back from the client
via i2c_get_clientdata(). No need to send it though platform data.
> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> + stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
> + 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_irq_exit;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_irq_exit:
> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +err_chip_exit:
> + stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +
> + return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
'\n' here.
> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
> + &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
Don't think you need a separate function for this. Just move the
regmap_raw_write() commands here.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev,
> + "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
As above.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "stmfx-core",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
> + .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
> + },
> + .probe = stmfx_probe,
> + .remove = stmfx_remove,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
[...]
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
2019-04-03 10:01 ` Lee Jones
(?)
@ 2019-04-04 13:22 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
>
> Just a couple of nits below.
>
> [...]
>
Thanks for reviewing.
>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u32 id;
>> + u8 version[2];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
>
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
>
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
>
Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is
more accurate.
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>
> if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> }
>
> if (stmfx->vdd) {
>
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
>
> Please move everything from here --------------->
>
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> + .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> + .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> + .name = "stmfx-idd",
>> + .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> + .name = "stmfx-ts",
>> + .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + switch (reg) {
>> + case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .reg_stride = 1,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> + .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> + .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> + .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
>
> ----------------------->
>
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
>
I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.
>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!stmfx)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> + stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (client->irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + ret = client->irq;
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> + stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> + stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> + }
>
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
>
> ...
>
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()? That
> does exactly the same thing. So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata(). No need to send it though platform data.
>
Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.
>> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> + stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> + 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> + stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> + &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
>
> Don't think you need a separate function for this. Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
>
I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of
backup/restore failure.
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> + "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
>
> As above.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "stmfx-core",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> + .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> + },
>> + .probe = stmfx_probe,
>> + .remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> [...]
>
I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore
separate functions ?
Regards,
Amelie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-04 13:22 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
>
> Just a couple of nits below.
>
> [...]
>
Thanks for reviewing.
>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u32 id;
>> + u8 version[2];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
>
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
>
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
>
Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is
more accurate.
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>
> if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> }
>
> if (stmfx->vdd) {
>
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
>
> Please move everything from here --------------->
>
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> + .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> + .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> + .name = "stmfx-idd",
>> + .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> + .name = "stmfx-ts",
>> + .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + switch (reg) {
>> + case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .reg_stride = 1,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> + .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> + .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> + .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
>
> ----------------------->
>
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
>
I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.
>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!stmfx)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> + stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (client->irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + ret = client->irq;
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> + stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> + stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> + }
>
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
>
> ...
>
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()? That
> does exactly the same thing. So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata(). No need to send it though platform data.
>
Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.
>> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> + stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> + 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> + stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> + &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
>
> Don't think you need a separate function for this. Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
>
I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of
backup/restore failure.
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> + "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
>
> As above.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "stmfx-core",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> + .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> + },
>> + .probe = stmfx_probe,
>> + .remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> [...]
>
I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore
separate functions ?
Regards,
Amelie
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-04 13:22 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 ++
>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
>
> Just a couple of nits below.
>
> [...]
>
Thanks for reviewing.
>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u32 id;
>> + u8 version[2];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
>
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
>
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
>
Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is
more accurate.
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>
> if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> } else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> }
>
> if (stmfx->vdd) {
>
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
>
> Please move everything from here --------------->
>
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> + .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> + .resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> + .name = "stmfx-idd",
>> + .resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> + .name = "stmfx-ts",
>> + .resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + switch (reg) {
>> + case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> + case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> + return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .reg_stride = 1,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> + .max_register = STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> + .volatile_reg = stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> + .writeable_reg = stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
>
> ----------------------->
>
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
>
I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.
>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!stmfx)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> + stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (client->irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + ret = client->irq;
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> + stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> + stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> + }
>
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
>
> ...
>
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()? That
> does exactly the same thing. So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata(). No need to send it though platform data.
>
Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.
>> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> + stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> + 0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> + stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> + return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> + &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> + sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> '\n' here.
>
>> + ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> + &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
>
> Don't think you need a separate function for this. Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
>
I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of
backup/restore failure.
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> + "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
>
> As above.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "stmfx-core",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> + .pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> + },
>> + .probe = stmfx_probe,
>> + .remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> [...]
>
I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore
separate functions ?
Regards,
Amelie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+ cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+ second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+ <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+ controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ ...
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ leds {
+ compatible = "gpio-leds";
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
+
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
+ }
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+ cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+ second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+ <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+ controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ ...
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ leds {
+ compatible = "gpio-leds";
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
+
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
+ }
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+ cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+ second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+ <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+ controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+ should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ ...
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ leds {
+ compatible = "gpio-leds";
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
+
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
+ }
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
select PINCONF
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+ tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+ select GENERIC_PINCONF
+ select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+ select MFD_STMFX
+ help
+ Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+ GPIO expander.
+ This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+ and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+ interrupt-controller.
+
config PINCTRL_U300
bool "U300 pin controller driver"
depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ) += pinctrl-lantiq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX) += pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X) += pinctrl-tb10x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) += pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) += pinctrl-stmfx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ) += pinctrl-zynq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC) += pinctrl-ingenic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805) += pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS 3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG 8
+#define get_reg(offset) ((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset) ((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset) (BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+ PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+ struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+ struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+ struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+ /* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+ u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ /* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+ u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 value;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+ return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+ mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+ /*
+ * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+ * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+ */
+
+ return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ u32 dir, type, pupd;
+ u32 arg = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return type;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return pupd;
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ if (dir && type && !pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ if (type && pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ if (dir)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ arg = ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+ unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ enum pin_config_param param;
+ u32 arg;
+ int dir, i, ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range) {
+ dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+ param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+ arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+ pin, arg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+ if (!range)
+ return;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return;
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (!dir) {
+ seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+ pupd ? "with" : "without");
+ else
+ seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+ } else {
+ seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+ pupd ? "up" : "down");
+ else
+ seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+ }
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+ .pin_config_get = stmfx_pinconf_get,
+ .pin_config_set = stmfx_pinconf_set,
+ .pin_config_dbg_show = stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const unsigned int **pins,
+ unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+ .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+ }
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+ /*
+ * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+ * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+ * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+ * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+ */
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+ mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ /*
+ * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+ * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+ * to set the right irq trigger type.
+ */
+ if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+ if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int val;
+
+ if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+ return;
+
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (val) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, 0);
+
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, mask);
+ }
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+ u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+ unsigned long n, status;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+ &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+ u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+ }
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+ }
+
+ return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+ u32 n;
+ int irq, ret;
+
+ pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pctl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+ pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+ if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq <= 0) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+ /* Register pin controller */
+ pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+ pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+ ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+ pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Register gpio controller */
+ pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+ pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+ ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+ for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+ clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+ ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+ 0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+ dev_info(pctl->dev,
+ "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+ return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+ .pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
select PINCONF
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+ tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+ select GENERIC_PINCONF
+ select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+ select MFD_STMFX
+ help
+ Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+ GPIO expander.
+ This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+ and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+ interrupt-controller.
+
config PINCTRL_U300
bool "U300 pin controller driver"
depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ) += pinctrl-lantiq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX) += pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X) += pinctrl-tb10x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) += pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) += pinctrl-stmfx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ) += pinctrl-zynq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC) += pinctrl-ingenic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805) += pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS 3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG 8
+#define get_reg(offset) ((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset) ((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset) (BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+ PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+ struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+ struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+ struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+ /* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+ u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ /* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+ u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 value;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+ return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+ mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+ /*
+ * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+ * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+ */
+
+ return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ u32 dir, type, pupd;
+ u32 arg = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return type;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return pupd;
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ if (dir && type && !pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ if (type && pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ if (dir)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ arg = ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+ unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ enum pin_config_param param;
+ u32 arg;
+ int dir, i, ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range) {
+ dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+ param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+ arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+ pin, arg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+ if (!range)
+ return;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return;
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (!dir) {
+ seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+ pupd ? "with" : "without");
+ else
+ seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+ } else {
+ seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+ pupd ? "up" : "down");
+ else
+ seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+ }
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+ .pin_config_get = stmfx_pinconf_get,
+ .pin_config_set = stmfx_pinconf_set,
+ .pin_config_dbg_show = stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const unsigned int **pins,
+ unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+ .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+ }
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+ /*
+ * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+ * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+ * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+ * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+ */
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+ mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ /*
+ * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+ * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+ * to set the right irq trigger type.
+ */
+ if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+ if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int val;
+
+ if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+ return;
+
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (val) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, 0);
+
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, mask);
+ }
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+ u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+ unsigned long n, status;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+ &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+ u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+ }
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+ }
+
+ return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+ u32 n;
+ int irq, ret;
+
+ pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pctl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+ pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+ if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq <= 0) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+ /* Register pin controller */
+ pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+ pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+ ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+ pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Register gpio controller */
+ pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+ pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+ ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+ for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+ clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+ ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+ 0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+ dev_info(pctl->dev,
+ "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+ return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+ .pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
select PINCONF
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+ tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+ select GENERIC_PINCONF
+ select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+ select MFD_STMFX
+ help
+ Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+ GPIO expander.
+ This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+ and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+ interrupt-controller.
+
config PINCTRL_U300
bool "U300 pin controller driver"
depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ) += pinctrl-lantiq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX) += pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X) += pinctrl-tb10x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) += pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) += pinctrl-stmfx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ) += pinctrl-zynq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC) += pinctrl-ingenic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805) += pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS 3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG 8
+#define get_reg(offset) ((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset) ((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset) (BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+ PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct stmfx *stmfx;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+ struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+ struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+ struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+ struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+ unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+ /* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+ u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+ /* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+ u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 value;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+ return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+ mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+ /*
+ * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+ * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+ */
+
+ return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+ u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+ return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ u32 dir, type, pupd;
+ u32 arg = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return type;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return pupd;
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ if (dir && type && !pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ if (type && pupd)
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+ arg = 1;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ if (dir)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ arg = ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+ unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ enum pin_config_param param;
+ u32 arg;
+ int dir, i, ret;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+ if (!range) {
+ dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return dir;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+ param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+ arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+ switch (param) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ if (!dir)
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+ else
+ ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+ pin, arg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+ int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+ range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+ if (!range)
+ return;
+
+ dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (dir < 0)
+ return;
+ type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+ if (type < 0)
+ return;
+ pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+ if (pupd < 0)
+ return;
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (!dir) {
+ seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+ pupd ? "with" : "without");
+ else
+ seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+ } else {
+ seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+ if (type)
+ seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+ pupd ? "up" : "down");
+ else
+ seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+ }
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+ .pin_config_get = stmfx_pinconf_get,
+ .pin_config_set = stmfx_pinconf_set,
+ .pin_config_dbg_show = stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const unsigned int **pins,
+ unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+ .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+ irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+ }
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+ /*
+ * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+ * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+ * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+ * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+ */
+
+ if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+ mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+ u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+ /*
+ * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+ * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+ * to set the right irq trigger type.
+ */
+ if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+ if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+ else
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+ u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+ int val;
+
+ if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+ return;
+
+ val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+ if (val < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (val) {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, 0);
+
+ } else {
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+ regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+ STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+ mask, mask);
+ }
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+ u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+ u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+ unsigned long n, status;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+ &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+ for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+ handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+ }
+
+ regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+ u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+ }
+
+ gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+ if (gpio_range) {
+ func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+ pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+ }
+
+ return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+ u32 n;
+ int irq, ret;
+
+ pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pctl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+ pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+ if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq <= 0) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+ /* Register pin controller */
+ pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+ pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+ pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+ ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+ pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Register gpio controller */
+ pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+ pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+ pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+ ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+ pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+ for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+ clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+ ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+ 0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+ dev_info(pctl->dev,
+ "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+ return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+ pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+ pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+ .of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+ .pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+ .remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 13:55 ` Linus Walleij
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Mark Rutland,
open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones, linux-stm32, Linux ARM
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 13:55 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Mark Rutland,
open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones, linux-stm32, Linux ARM
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 13:55 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay
Cc: Lee Jones, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
Maxime Coquelin, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, linux-kernel,
open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
Linux ARM, linux-stm32
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "stm32f746.dtsi"
#include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&rtc {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "stm32f746.dtsi"
#include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&rtc {
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "stm32f746.dtsi"
#include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&rtc {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
};
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ };
+
usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
#phy-cells = <0>;
compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
};
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ };
+
usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
#phy-cells = <0>;
compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
};
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+ };
+
usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
#phy-cells = <0>;
compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
};
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
red {
gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
};
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
};
gpio_keys {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
};
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
red {
gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
};
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
};
gpio_keys {
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
};
+ orange {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+ };
red {
gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
};
+ blue {
+ gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+ };
};
gpio_keys {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&i2c5 {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&i2c5 {
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
status = "okay";
+
+ stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+ reg = <0x42>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+ stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+ compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+ };
+ };
};
&i2c5 {
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
ethernet0 = ðernet0;
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
compatible = "gpio-backlight";
gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-down;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
ethernet0 = ðernet0;
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
compatible = "gpio-backlight";
gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-down;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay
The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
/ {
model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
ethernet0 = ðernet0;
};
+ joystick {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ button-0 {
+ label = "JoySel";
+ linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-1 {
+ label = "JoyDown";
+ linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-2 {
+ label = "JoyLeft";
+ linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-3 {
+ label = "JoyRight";
+ linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ button-4 {
+ label = "JoyUp";
+ linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+ interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+ };
+
panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
compatible = "gpio-backlight";
gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+ joystick_pins: joystick {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+ drive-push-pull;
+ bias-pull-down;
+ };
};
};
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
@ 2019-02-28 8:51 ` Alexandre Torgue
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Torgue @ 2019-02-28 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay, Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring,
Mark Rutland, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-stm32, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree
Hi Amélie
On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
>
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
>
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
>
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
> dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>
DT patches looks good. I'll take them in STM32 soc tree as soon as Lee
takes driver part.
Regards
Alex
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-28 8:51 ` Alexandre Torgue
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Torgue @ 2019-02-28 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie Delaunay, Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring,
Mark Rutland, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
Hi Amélie
On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
>
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
>
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
>
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
> dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>
DT patches looks good. I'll take them in STM32 soc tree as soon as Lee
takes driver part.
Regards
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
2019-02-27 9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
(?)
@ 2019-03-29 8:48 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
Hi,
A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
taken in STM32 soc tree).
Regards,
Amelie
On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
>
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
>
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
>
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
> dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-03-29 8:48 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-stm32, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree
Hi,
A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
taken in STM32 soc tree).
Regards,
Amelie
On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
>
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
>
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
>
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
> dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-03-29 8:48 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
Hi,
A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
taken in STM32 soc tree).
Regards,
Amelie
On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
>
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
>
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
>
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
> dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
2019-03-29 8:48 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
(?)
@ 2019-04-01 10:19 ` Lee Jones
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
> taken in STM32 soc tree).
I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.
Please be patient. You are on the list.
> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> >
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> >
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> > i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> > in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> >
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> > dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> > mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> > dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> > pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> > 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> >
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-04-01 10:19 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
> taken in STM32 soc tree).
I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.
Please be patient. You are on the list.
> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> >
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> >
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> > i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> > in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> >
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> > dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> > mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> > dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> > pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> > 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> >
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-04-01 10:19 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amelie DELAUNAY
Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be
> taken in STM32 soc tree).
I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.
Please be patient. You are on the list.
> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> >
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> >
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> > i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> > in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> >
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> > dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> > mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> > dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> > pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt | 116 +++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 66 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 60 ++
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 13 +
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 568 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++
> > 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> >
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread