[PATCH v2 0/9] RPMPD for QCS404 and MSM8998

[PATCH v2 0/9] RPMPD for QCS404 and MSM8998

[Sibi Sankar]

Re-worked the macros of the rpmpd driver. Add power domains support
for QCS404 and MSM8998.

V2:
* Add rpmpd support for msm8998
* fixup corner/vfc with vlfl/vfl

Bjorn Andersson (4):
  soc: qcom: rpmpd: Modify corner defining macros
  dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for qcs404
  soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add QCS404 power-domains
  arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: Add rpmpd node

Sibi Sankar (5):
  soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance state
  soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support to set rpmpd state to max
  dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for msm8998
  soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add MSM8998 power-domains
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add rpmpd node

 .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi         |  51 +++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi          |  55 ++++++++
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c                      | 129 ++++++++++++++----
 include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h        |  34 +++++
 5 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance state

[Sibi Sankar]

Fixup rpmpd state to max if the required state is greater than all the
supported states.

Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("Add support for the .set_performace_state() and
.opp_to_performance_state()")

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 005326050c23..235d01870dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
 	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
 
 	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
-		goto out;
+		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
 
 	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance state

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 3/24/2019 11:19 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Fixup rpmpd state to max if the required state is greater than all the
> supported states.

This should also say why, 'so the clients which just want to vote on whatever
is the max state supported can do so by passing an INT_MAX'?

> 
> Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("Add support for the .set_performace_state() and
> .opp_to_performance_state()")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 005326050c23..235d01870dd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
>   	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>   
>   	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
> -		goto out;
> +		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>   
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance state

[Sibi Sankar]

On 2019-03-25 09:33, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 11:19 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Fixup rpmpd state to max if the required state is greater than all the
>> supported states.
> 
> This should also say why, 'so the clients which just want to vote on 
> whatever
> is the max state supported can do so by passing an INT_MAX'?

will add more detail in v3

> 
>> 
>> Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("Add support for the .set_performace_state() and
>> .opp_to_performance_state()")
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> index 005326050c23..235d01870dd8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct 
>> generic_pm_domain *domain,
>>   	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>>     	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
>> -		goto out;
>> +		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
>>     	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>> 

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH v2 2/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support to set rpmpd state to max

[Sibi Sankar]

Add support to set rpmpd state to max across SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 235d01870dd8..71fdfafad2ea 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -83,12 +83,14 @@ struct rpmpd {
 	const int res_type;
 	const int res_id;
 	struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
+	unsigned int max_state;
 	__le32 key;
 };
 
 struct rpmpd_desc {
 	struct rpmpd **rpmpds;
 	size_t num_pds;
+	unsigned int max_state;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
 static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8996_desc = {
 	.rpmpds = msm8996_rpmpds,
 	.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_rpmpds),
+	.max_state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE,
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id rpmpd_match_table[] = {
@@ -225,8 +228,8 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
 
-	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
-		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
+	if (state > pd->max_state)
+		state = pd->max_state;
 
 	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
 
@@ -287,6 +290,7 @@ static int rpmpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 
 		rpmpds[i]->rpm = rpm;
+		rpmpds[i]->max_state = desc->max_state;
 		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_off = rpmpd_power_off;
 		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_on = rpmpd_power_on;
 		rpmpds[i]->pd.set_performance_state = rpmpd_set_performance;
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support to set rpmpd state to max

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Add support to set rpmpd state to max across SoCs.

Changelog could be better, 'rpmpd max state varies across SoCs
and SoC families, add support in the driver to make it SoC/SoC
family specific'

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 8 ++++++--
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 235d01870dd8..71fdfafad2ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -83,12 +83,14 @@ struct rpmpd {
>   	const int res_type;
>   	const int res_id;
>   	struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
> +	unsigned int max_state;
>   	__le32 key;
>   };
>   
>   struct rpmpd_desc {
>   	struct rpmpd **rpmpds;
>   	size_t num_pds;
> +	unsigned int max_state;
>   };
>   
>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
> @@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
>   static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8996_desc = {
>   	.rpmpds = msm8996_rpmpds,
>   	.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_rpmpds),
> +	.max_state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE,

Maybe this needs to be renamed to avoid confusion, MAX_8996_RPMPD_STATE?

>   };
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id rpmpd_match_table[] = {
> @@ -225,8 +228,8 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>   
> -	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
> -		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
> +	if (state > pd->max_state)
> +		state = pd->max_state;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>   
> @@ -287,6 +290,7 @@ static int rpmpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		}
>   
>   		rpmpds[i]->rpm = rpm;
> +		rpmpds[i]->max_state = desc->max_state;
>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_off = rpmpd_power_off;
>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_on = rpmpd_power_on;
>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.set_performance_state = rpmpd_set_performance;
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support to set rpmpd state to max

[Sibi Sankar]

On 2019-03-25 09:36, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Add support to set rpmpd state to max across SoCs.
> 
> Changelog could be better, 'rpmpd max state varies across SoCs
> and SoC families, add support in the driver to make it SoC/SoC
> family specific'

will use this in v3

> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 8 ++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> index 235d01870dd8..71fdfafad2ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> @@ -83,12 +83,14 @@ struct rpmpd {
>>   	const int res_type;
>>   	const int res_id;
>>   	struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
>> +	unsigned int max_state;
>>   	__le32 key;
>>   };
>>     struct rpmpd_desc {
>>   	struct rpmpd **rpmpds;
>>   	size_t num_pds;
>> +	unsigned int max_state;
>>   };
>>     static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
>> @@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
>>   static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8996_desc = {
>>   	.rpmpds = msm8996_rpmpds,
>>   	.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_rpmpds),
>> +	.max_state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE,
> 
> Maybe this needs to be renamed to avoid confusion, 
> MAX_8996_RPMPD_STATE?

sure

> 
>>   };
>>     static const struct of_device_id rpmpd_match_table[] = {
>> @@ -225,8 +228,8 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct 
>> generic_pm_domain *domain,
>>   	int ret = 0;
>>   	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>>   -	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
>> -		state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
>> +	if (state > pd->max_state)
>> +		state = pd->max_state;
>>     	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>>   @@ -287,6 +290,7 @@ static int rpmpd_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>   		}
>>     		rpmpds[i]->rpm = rpm;
>> +		rpmpds[i]->max_state = desc->max_state;
>>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_off = rpmpd_power_off;
>>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.power_on = rpmpd_power_on;
>>   		rpmpds[i]->pd.set_performance_state = rpmpd_set_performance;
>> 

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH v2 3/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Modify corner defining macros

[Sibi Sankar]

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

QCS404 uses individual resource type magic for each power-domain, so
adjust the macros slightly to make them reusable for this.

[sibi: Extend rpmpd corner pair to a generic rpmpd pair]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 71fdfafad2ea..17cd59d1ac3b 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
 #define domain_to_rpmpd(domain) container_of(domain, struct rpmpd, pd)
 
 /* Resource types */
-#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73
-#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c
+#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73 /* smpa */
+#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c /* ldoa */
 
 /* Operation Keys */
 #define KEY_CORNER		0x6e726f63 /* corn */
@@ -27,46 +27,41 @@
 
 #define MAX_RPMPD_STATE		6
 
-#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(_platform, _name, _active, r_id)		\
+#define DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(_platform, _name, _active, r_type, r_key,	\
+			  r_id)						\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active;			\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
 		.pd = {	.name = #_name,	},				\
 		.peer = &_platform##_##_active,				\
-		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
 		.res_id = r_id,						\
-		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
+		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
 	};								\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active = {			\
 		.pd = { .name = #_active, },				\
 		.peer = &_platform##_##_name,				\
 		.active_only = true,					\
-		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
 		.res_id = r_id,						\
-		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
+		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
 	}
 
-#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
+#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
 		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
-		.res_type = RPMPD_LDOA,					\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
 		.res_id = r_id,						\
 		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
 	}
 
-#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, r_type)		\
+#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
 		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
-		.res_type = r_type,					\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
 		.res_id = r_id,						\
 		.key = KEY_FLOOR_CORNER,				\
 	}
 
-#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
-	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_SMPA)
-
-#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
-	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_LDOA)
-
 struct rpmpd_req {
 	__le32 key;
 	__le32 nbytes;
@@ -96,12 +91,12 @@ struct rpmpd_desc {
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
 
 /* msm8996 RPM Power domains */
-DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, 1);
-DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, 2);
-DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx, 26);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 1);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 2);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(msm8996, vddsscx, LDOA, 26);
 
-DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, 1);
-DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, 26);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, SMPA, 1);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, LDOA, 26);
 
 static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
 	[MSM8996_VDDCX] =	&msm8996_vddcx,
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Modify corner defining macros

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> 
> QCS404 uses individual resource type magic for each power-domain, so
> adjust the macros slightly to make them reusable for this.
> 
> [sibi: Extend rpmpd corner pair to a generic rpmpd pair]

This needs to be right above your SoB I think.

> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 71fdfafad2ea..17cd59d1ac3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
>   #define domain_to_rpmpd(domain) container_of(domain, struct rpmpd, pd)
>   
>   /* Resource types */
> -#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73
> -#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c
> +#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73 /* smpa */
> +#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c /* ldoa */
>   
>   /* Operation Keys */
>   #define KEY_CORNER		0x6e726f63 /* corn */
> @@ -27,46 +27,41 @@
>   
>   #define MAX_RPMPD_STATE		6
>   
> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(_platform, _name, _active, r_id)		\
> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(_platform, _name, _active, r_type, r_key,	\
> +			  r_id)						\
>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active;			\
>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>   		.pd = {	.name = #_name,	},				\
>   		.peer = &_platform##_##_active,				\
> -		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
> -		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
> +		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
>   	};								\
>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active = {			\
>   		.pd = { .name = #_active, },				\
>   		.peer = &_platform##_##_name,				\
>   		.active_only = true,					\
> -		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
> -		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
> +		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
>   	}
>   
> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>   		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
> -		.res_type = RPMPD_LDOA,					\
> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>   		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
>   	}
>   
> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, r_type)		\
> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>   		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
> -		.res_type = r_type,					\
> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>   		.key = KEY_FLOOR_CORNER,				\
>   	}
>   
> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
> -	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_SMPA)
> -
> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
> -	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_LDOA)
> -
>   struct rpmpd_req {
>   	__le32 key;
>   	__le32 nbytes;
> @@ -96,12 +91,12 @@ struct rpmpd_desc {
>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
>   
>   /* msm8996 RPM Power domains */
> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, 1);
> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, 2);
> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx, 26);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 1);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 2);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(msm8996, vddsscx, LDOA, 26);
>   
> -DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, 1);
> -DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, 26);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, SMPA, 1);
> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, LDOA, 26);
>   
>   static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
>   	[MSM8996_VDDCX] =	&msm8996_vddcx,
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Modify corner defining macros

[Sibi Sankar]

On 2019-03-25 09:37, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> 
>> QCS404 uses individual resource type magic for each power-domain, so
>> adjust the macros slightly to make them reusable for this.
>> 
>> [sibi: Extend rpmpd corner pair to a generic rpmpd pair]
> 
> This needs to be right above your SoB I think.

will re-order them in v3

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 39 
>> +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> index 71fdfafad2ea..17cd59d1ac3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
>> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
>>   #define domain_to_rpmpd(domain) container_of(domain, struct rpmpd, 
>> pd)
>>     /* Resource types */
>> -#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73
>> -#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c
>> +#define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73 /* smpa */
>> +#define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c /* ldoa */
>>     /* Operation Keys */
>>   #define KEY_CORNER		0x6e726f63 /* corn */
>> @@ -27,46 +27,41 @@
>>     #define MAX_RPMPD_STATE		6
>>   -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(_platform, _name, _active, 
>> r_id)		\
>> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(_platform, _name, _active, r_type, r_key,	\
>> +			  r_id)						\
>>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active;			\
>>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>>   		.pd = {	.name = #_name,	},				\
>>   		.peer = &_platform##_##_active,				\
>> -		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
>> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>> -		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
>> +		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
>>   	};								\
>>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active = {			\
>>   		.pd = { .name = #_active, },				\
>>   		.peer = &_platform##_##_name,				\
>>   		.active_only = true,					\
>> -		.res_type = RPMPD_SMPA,					\
>> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>> -		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
>> +		.key = KEY_##r_key,					\
>>   	}
>>   -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
>> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
>>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>>   		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
>> -		.res_type = RPMPD_LDOA,					\
>> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>>   		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
>>   	}
>>   -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, r_type)		\
>> +#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
>>   	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
>>   		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
>> -		.res_type = r_type,					\
>> +		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
>>   		.res_id = r_id,						\
>>   		.key = KEY_FLOOR_CORNER,				\
>>   	}
>>   -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
>> -	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_SMPA)
>> -
>> -#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(_platform, _name, r_id)			\
>> -	DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_id, RPMPD_LDOA)
>> -
>>   struct rpmpd_req {
>>   	__le32 key;
>>   	__le32 nbytes;
>> @@ -96,12 +91,12 @@ struct rpmpd_desc {
>>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
>>     /* msm8996 RPM Power domains */
>> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, 1);
>> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_SMPA(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, 2);
>> -DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx, 26);
>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 1);
>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, SMPA, CORNER, 2);
>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_CORNER(msm8996, vddsscx, LDOA, 26);
>>   -DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, 1);
>> -DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, 26);
>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, SMPA, 1);
>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, LDOA, 26);
>>     static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
>>   	[MSM8996_VDDCX] =	&msm8996_vddcx,
>> 

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for qcs404

[Sibi Sankar]

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Add RPM Power domain bindings for the qcs404 family of SoC

[sibis: Add supported rpmpd states for qcs404]
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  |  1 +
 include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
index 980e5413d18f..172ccf940c5c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ which then translates it into a corresponding voltage on a rail
 Required Properties:
  - compatible: Should be one of the following
 	* qcom,msm8996-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the msm8996 family of SoC
+	* qcom,qcs404-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the qcs404 family of SoC
 	* qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd: RPMh Power domain for the sdm845 family of SoC
  - #power-domain-cells: number of cells in Power domain specifier
 	must be 1.
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
index 87d9c6611682..450378662944 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
@@ -36,4 +36,26 @@
 #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX		5
 #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX_VFC	6
 
+/* QCS404 Power Domains */
+#define QCS404_VDDMX		0
+#define QCS404_VDDMX_AO		1
+#define QCS404_VDDMX_VFL	2
+#define QCS404_LPICX		3
+#define QCS404_LPICX_VFL	4
+#define QCS404_LPIMX		5
+#define QCS404_LPIMX_VFL	6
+
+/* RPM SMD Power Domain performance levels */
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION       16
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION_PLUS  32
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_MIN_SVS         48
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_LOW_SVS         64
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS             128
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS_PLUS        192
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM             256
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM_PLUS        320
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO           384
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO_NO_CPR    416
+#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING         512
+
 #endif
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for qcs404

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> 
> Add RPM Power domain bindings for the qcs404 family of SoC
> 
> [sibis: Add supported rpmpd states for qcs404]
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>

SoB ordering seems wrong.

> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  |  1 +
>   include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> index 980e5413d18f..172ccf940c5c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ which then translates it into a corresponding voltage on a rail
>   Required Properties:
>    - compatible: Should be one of the following
>   	* qcom,msm8996-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the msm8996 family of SoC
> +	* qcom,qcs404-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the qcs404 family of SoC
>   	* qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd: RPMh Power domain for the sdm845 family of SoC
>    - #power-domain-cells: number of cells in Power domain specifier
>   	must be 1.
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> index 87d9c6611682..450378662944 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> @@ -36,4 +36,26 @@
>   #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX		5
>   #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX_VFC	6
>   
> +/* QCS404 Power Domains */
> +#define QCS404_VDDMX		0
> +#define QCS404_VDDMX_AO		1
> +#define QCS404_VDDMX_VFL	2
> +#define QCS404_LPICX		3
> +#define QCS404_LPICX_VFL	4
> +#define QCS404_LPIMX		5
> +#define QCS404_LPIMX_VFL	6
> +
> +/* RPM SMD Power Domain performance levels */

so unlike in the sdm845 case where we map these levels to
(contiguous) corners before passing it over to rpm, we seem
to pass these as-is to rpm, right?

Does this work if the user passes some value which does not
really map to a level defined here?
For instance if value passed is 17 for instance do we fall back to
16?
  
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION       16
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION_PLUS  32
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_MIN_SVS         48
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_LOW_SVS         64
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS             128
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS_PLUS        192
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM             256
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM_PLUS        320
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO           384
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO_NO_CPR    416
> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING         512
> +
>   #endif
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for qcs404

[Sibi Sankar]

On 2019-03-25 09:51, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 11:20 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> 
>> Add RPM Power domain bindings for the qcs404 family of SoC
>> 
>> [sibis: Add supported rpmpd states for qcs404]
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> 
> SoB ordering seems wrong.

will re-order them in v3

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  |  1 +
>>   include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h        | 22 
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
>> index 980e5413d18f..172ccf940c5c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ which then translates it into a corresponding voltage 
>> on a rail
>>   Required Properties:
>>    - compatible: Should be one of the following
>>   	* qcom,msm8996-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the msm8996 family of 
>> SoC
>> +	* qcom,qcs404-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the qcs404 family of SoC
>>   	* qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd: RPMh Power domain for the sdm845 family of 
>> SoC
>>    - #power-domain-cells: number of cells in Power domain specifier
>>   	must be 1.
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h 
>> b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> index 87d9c6611682..450378662944 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> @@ -36,4 +36,26 @@
>>   #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX		5
>>   #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX_VFC	6
>>   +/* QCS404 Power Domains */
>> +#define QCS404_VDDMX		0
>> +#define QCS404_VDDMX_AO		1
>> +#define QCS404_VDDMX_VFL	2
>> +#define QCS404_LPICX		3
>> +#define QCS404_LPICX_VFL	4
>> +#define QCS404_LPIMX		5
>> +#define QCS404_LPIMX_VFL	6
>> +
>> +/* RPM SMD Power Domain performance levels */
> 
> so unlike in the sdm845 case where we map these levels to
> (contiguous) corners before passing it over to rpm, we seem
> to pass these as-is to rpm, right?
> 
> Does this work if the user passes some value which does not
> really map to a level defined here?
> For instance if value passed is 17 for instance do we fall back to
> 16?

The rpm firmware will ensure that a ceil operation
is performed on any requested level which does not
map to a pre-defined level. I did try to do the
same in kernel however since the opp-levels are not
inserted in ascending order while populating the
opp-table for rpmpd, it becomes difficult to get
ceil/floor levels from the opp-table with minimal
changes.


> 
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION       16
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION_PLUS  32
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_MIN_SVS         48
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_LOW_SVS         64
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS             128
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS_PLUS        192
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM             256
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM_PLUS        320
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO           384
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO_NO_CPR    416
>> +#define RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING         512
>> +
>>   #endif
>> 

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[PATCH v2 5/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add QCS404 power-domains

[Sibi Sankar]

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Add the shared cx/mx and the low-power-island's cx and mx power-domains
found on QCS404.

[sibi: Fixup corner/vfc with vlfl/vfl]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 17cd59d1ac3b..60a305e9d429 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -19,11 +19,16 @@
 /* Resource types */
 #define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73 /* smpa */
 #define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c /* ldoa */
+#define RPMPD_RWMX 0x786d7772 /* rwmx */
+#define RPMPD_RWLC 0x636c7772 /* rwlc */
+#define RPMPD_RWLM 0x6d6c7772 /* rwlm */
 
 /* Operation Keys */
 #define KEY_CORNER		0x6e726f63 /* corn */
 #define KEY_ENABLE		0x6e657773 /* swen */
 #define KEY_FLOOR_CORNER	0x636676   /* vfc */
+#define KEY_FLOOR_LEVEL		0x6c6676   /* vfl */
+#define KEY_LEVEL		0x6c766c76 /* vlvl */
 
 #define MAX_RPMPD_STATE		6
 
@@ -54,6 +59,14 @@
 		.key = KEY_CORNER,					\
 	}
 
+#define DEFINE_RPMPD_LEVEL(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
+	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
+		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
+		.res_id = r_id,						\
+		.key = KEY_LEVEL,					\
+	}
+
 #define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
 		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
@@ -62,6 +75,14 @@
 		.key = KEY_FLOOR_CORNER,				\
 	}
 
+#define DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(_platform, _name, r_type, r_id)		\
+	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
+		.pd = { .name = #_name, },				\
+		.res_type = RPMPD_##r_type,				\
+		.res_id = r_id,						\
+		.key = KEY_FLOOR_LEVEL,					\
+	}
+
 struct rpmpd_req {
 	__le32 key;
 	__le32 nbytes;
@@ -114,8 +135,35 @@ static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8996_desc = {
 	.max_state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE,
 };
 
+/* qcs404 RPM Power domains */
+DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(qcs404, vddmx, vddmx_ao, RWMX, LEVEL, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(qcs404, vddmx_vfl, RWMX, 0);
+
+DEFINE_RPMPD_LEVEL(qcs404, vdd_lpicx, RWLC, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(qcs404, vdd_lpicx_vfl, RWLC, 0);
+
+DEFINE_RPMPD_LEVEL(qcs404, vdd_lpimx, RWLM, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(qcs404, vdd_lpimx_vfl, RWLM, 0);
+
+static struct rpmpd *qcs404_rpmpds[] = {
+	[QCS404_VDDMX] = &qcs404_vddmx,
+	[QCS404_VDDMX_AO] = &qcs404_vddmx_ao,
+	[QCS404_VDDMX_VFL] = &qcs404_vddmx_vfl,
+	[QCS404_LPICX] = &qcs404_vdd_lpicx,
+	[QCS404_LPICX_VFL] = &qcs404_vdd_lpicx_vfl,
+	[QCS404_LPIMX] = &qcs404_vdd_lpimx,
+	[QCS404_LPIMX_VFL] = &qcs404_vdd_lpimx_vfl,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmpd_desc qcs404_desc = {
+	.rpmpds = qcs404_rpmpds,
+	.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(qcs404_rpmpds),
+	.max_state = RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id rpmpd_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-rpmpd", .data = &msm8996_desc },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-rpmpd", .data = &qcs404_desc },
 	{ }
 };
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: Add rpmpd node

[Sibi Sankar]

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Add the rpmpd node on the qcs404 and define the available levels.

[sibis: fixup available levels]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
index e8fd26633d57..a7d46647c416 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qcs404.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
 
 / {
 	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
@@ -230,6 +231,60 @@
 				compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404";
 				#clock-cells = <1>;
 			};
+
+			rpmpd: power-controller {
+				compatible = "qcom,qcs404-rpmpd";
+				#power-domain-cells = <1>;
+				operating-points-v2 = <&rpmpd_opp_table>;
+
+				rpmpd_opp_table: opp-table {
+					compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+					rpmpd_opp_ret: opp1 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_ret_plus: opp2 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_min_svs: opp3 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_MIN_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_low_svs: opp4 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_LOW_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_svs: opp5 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_svs_plus: opp6 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_nom: opp7 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_nom_plus: opp8 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_turbo: opp9 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_turbo_no_cpr: opp10 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO_NO_CPR>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_turbo_plus: opp11 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING>;
+					};
+				};
+			};
 		};
 	};
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 7/9] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domain bindings for msm8998

[Sibi Sankar]

Add RPM Power domain bindings for the msm8998 family of SoC

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt         |  1 +
 include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h               | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
index 172ccf940c5c..eb35b22f9e23 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ which then translates it into a corresponding voltage on a rail
 Required Properties:
  - compatible: Should be one of the following
 	* qcom,msm8996-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the msm8996 family of SoC
+	* qcom,msm8998-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the msm8998 family of SoC
 	* qcom,qcs404-rpmpd: RPM Power domain for the qcs404 family of SoC
 	* qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd: RPMh Power domain for the sdm845 family of SoC
  - #power-domain-cells: number of cells in Power domain specifier
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
index 450378662944..93e36d011527 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
@@ -36,6 +36,18 @@
 #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX		5
 #define MSM8996_VDDSSCX_VFC	6
 
+/* MSM8998 Power Domain Indexes */
+#define MSM8998_VDDCX		0
+#define MSM8998_VDDCX_AO	1
+#define MSM8998_VDDCX_VFL	2
+#define MSM8998_VDDMX		3
+#define MSM8998_VDDMX_AO	4
+#define MSM8998_VDDMX_VFL	5
+#define MSM8998_SSCCX		6
+#define MSM8998_SSCCX_VFL	7
+#define MSM8998_SSCMX		8
+#define MSM8998_SSCMX_VFL	9
+
 /* QCS404 Power Domains */
 #define QCS404_VDDMX		0
 #define QCS404_VDDMX_AO		1
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 8/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add MSM8998 power-domains

[Sibi Sankar]

Add the shared cx/mx and sensor sub-system's cx and mx
power-domains found on MSM8998.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 60a305e9d429..bc09874a343c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -19,9 +19,12 @@
 /* Resource types */
 #define RPMPD_SMPA 0x61706d73 /* smpa */
 #define RPMPD_LDOA 0x616f646c /* ldoa */
+#define RPMPD_RWCX 0x78637772 /* rwcx */
 #define RPMPD_RWMX 0x786d7772 /* rwmx */
 #define RPMPD_RWLC 0x636c7772 /* rwlc */
 #define RPMPD_RWLM 0x6d6c7772 /* rwlm */
+#define RPMPD_RWSC 0x63737772 /* rwsc */
+#define RPMPD_RWSM 0x6d737772 /* rwsm */
 
 /* Operation Keys */
 #define KEY_CORNER		0x6e726f63 /* corn */
@@ -135,6 +138,38 @@ static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8996_desc = {
 	.max_state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE,
 };
 
+/* msm8998 RPM Power domains */
+DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8998, vddcx, vddcx_ao, RWCX, LEVEL, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(msm8998, vddcx_vfl, RWCX, 0);
+
+DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(msm8998, vddmx, vddmx_ao, RWMX, LEVEL, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(msm8998, vddmx_vfl, RWMX, 0);
+
+DEFINE_RPMPD_LEVEL(msm8998, vdd_ssccx, RWSC, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(msm8998, vdd_ssccx_vfl, RWSC, 0);
+
+DEFINE_RPMPD_LEVEL(msm8998, vdd_sscmx, RWSM, 0);
+DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(msm8998, vdd_sscmx_vfl, RWSM, 0);
+
+static struct rpmpd *msm8998_rpmpds[] = {
+	[MSM8998_VDDCX] =		&msm8998_vddcx,
+	[MSM8998_VDDCX_AO] =		&msm8998_vddcx_ao,
+	[MSM8998_VDDCX_VFL] =		&msm8998_vddcx_vfl,
+	[MSM8998_VDDMX] =		&msm8998_vddmx,
+	[MSM8998_VDDMX_AO] =		&msm8998_vddmx_ao,
+	[MSM8998_VDDMX_VFL] =		&msm8998_vddmx_vfl,
+	[MSM8998_SSCCX] =		&msm8998_vdd_ssccx,
+	[MSM8998_SSCCX_VFL] =		&msm8998_vdd_ssccx_vfl,
+	[MSM8998_SSCMX] =		&msm8998_vdd_sscmx,
+	[MSM8998_SSCMX_VFL] =		&msm8998_vdd_sscmx_vfl,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmpd_desc msm8998_desc = {
+	.rpmpds = msm8998_rpmpds,
+	.num_pds = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8998_rpmpds),
+	.max_state = RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING,
+};
+
 /* qcs404 RPM Power domains */
 DEFINE_RPMPD_PAIR(qcs404, vddmx, vddmx_ao, RWMX, LEVEL, 0);
 DEFINE_RPMPD_VFL(qcs404, vddmx_vfl, RWMX, 0);
@@ -163,6 +198,7 @@ static const struct rpmpd_desc qcs404_desc = {
 
 static const struct of_device_id rpmpd_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-rpmpd", .data = &msm8996_desc },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-rpmpd", .data = &msm8998_desc },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-rpmpd", .data = &qcs404_desc },
 	{ }
 };
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add rpmpd node

[Sibi Sankar]

Add the rpmpd node on the msm8998 and define the available levels.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index 3fd0769fe648..b7e3e0646b9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8998.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
 
 / {
@@ -272,6 +273,56 @@
 				compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", "qcom,rpmcc";
 				#clock-cells = <1>;
 			};
+
+			rpmpd: power-controller {
+				compatible = "qcom,msm8998-rpmpd";
+				#power-domain-cells = <1>;
+				operating-points-v2 = <&rpmpd_opp_table>;
+
+				rpmpd_opp_table: opp-table {
+					compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+					rpmpd_opp_ret: opp1 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_ret_plus: opp2 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_RETENTION_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_min_svs: opp3 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_MIN_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmpd_opp_low_svs: opp4 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_LOW_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_svs: opp5 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_svs_plus: opp6 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_SVS_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_nom: opp7 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_nom_plus: opp8 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_NOM_PLUS>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_turbo: opp9 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO>;
+					};
+
+					rpmhpd_opp_turbo_plus: opp10 {
+						opp-level = <RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING>;
+					};
+				};
+			};
 		};
 	};
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project