* [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 @ 2019-03-22 13:47 Thomas Preston 2019-03-25 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Preston @ 2019-03-22 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rjw, lenb, linux-acpi, linux-kernel; +Cc: Thomas Preston Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. Signed-off-by: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> --- Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt index 7bcf9c3d9fbe..391db643065a 100644 --- a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt +++ b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt @@ -410,6 +410,33 @@ Specifically, the device IDs returned by _HID and preceding PRP0001 in the _CID return package will be checked first. Also in that case the bus type the device will be enumerated to depends on the device ID returned by _HID. +For example, the following ACPI sample might be used to enumerate an lm75-type +I2C temperature sensor and match it to the driver using the Device Tree +namespace link: + + Device (TMP0) + { + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ + Name (_CID, "PRP0001") + Name (_DSD, Package() { + ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), + Package () { + Package (2) { "compatible", "ti,tmp75" }, + } + }) + Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) + { + Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate () + { + I2cSerialBusV2 (0x48, ControllerInitiated, + 400000, AddressingMode7Bit, + "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C1", 0x00, + ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,) + }) + Return (SBUF) + } + } + It is valid to define device objects with a _HID returning PRP0001 and without the "compatible" property in the _DSD or a _CID as long as one of their ancestors provides a _DSD with a valid "compatible" property. Such device -- 2.11.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-22 13:47 [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 Thomas Preston @ 2019-03-25 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-03-25 10:05 ` Mika Westerberg 2019-03-25 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2019-03-25 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Preston, Mika Westerberg, Andy Shevchenko Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? > Signed-off-by: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> > --- > Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > index 7bcf9c3d9fbe..391db643065a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > +++ b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > @@ -410,6 +410,33 @@ Specifically, the device IDs returned by _HID and preceding PRP0001 in the _CID > return package will be checked first. Also in that case the bus type the device > will be enumerated to depends on the device ID returned by _HID. > > +For example, the following ACPI sample might be used to enumerate an lm75-type > +I2C temperature sensor and match it to the driver using the Device Tree > +namespace link: > + > + Device (TMP0) > + { > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > + Name (_CID, "PRP0001") > + Name (_DSD, Package() { > + ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > + Package () { > + Package (2) { "compatible", "ti,tmp75" }, > + } > + }) > + Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) > + { > + Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate () > + { > + I2cSerialBusV2 (0x48, ControllerInitiated, > + 400000, AddressingMode7Bit, > + "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C1", 0x00, > + ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,) > + }) > + Return (SBUF) > + } > + } > + > It is valid to define device objects with a _HID returning PRP0001 and without > the "compatible" property in the _DSD or a _CID as long as one of their > ancestors provides a _DSD with a valid "compatible" property. Such device > -- > 2.11.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2019-03-25 10:05 ` Mika Westerberg 2019-03-25 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mika Westerberg @ 2019-03-25 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Thomas Preston, Andy Shevchenko, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? Looks good to me. Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-03-25 10:05 ` Mika Westerberg @ 2019-03-25 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Thomas Preston, Mika Westerberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? Good to me, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] umbrella as a database for such excerpts. Thomas, can you do that? [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> > > --- > > Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > index 7bcf9c3d9fbe..391db643065a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > @@ -410,6 +410,33 @@ Specifically, the device IDs returned by _HID and preceding PRP0001 in the _CID > > return package will be checked first. Also in that case the bus type the device > > will be enumerated to depends on the device ID returned by _HID. > > > > +For example, the following ACPI sample might be used to enumerate an lm75-type > > +I2C temperature sensor and match it to the driver using the Device Tree > > +namespace link: > > + > > + Device (TMP0) > > + { > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > > + Name (_CID, "PRP0001") > > + Name (_DSD, Package() { > > + ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > > + Package () { > > + Package (2) { "compatible", "ti,tmp75" }, > > + } > > + }) > > + Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) > > + { > > + Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate () > > + { > > + I2cSerialBusV2 (0x48, ControllerInitiated, > > + 400000, AddressingMode7Bit, > > + "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C1", 0x00, > > + ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,) > > + }) > > + Return (SBUF) > > + } > > + } > > + > > It is valid to define device objects with a _HID returning PRP0001 and without > > the "compatible" property in the _DSD or a _CID as long as one of their > > ancestors provides a _DSD with a valid "compatible" property. Such device > > -- > > 2.11.0 > > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 14:42 ` Thomas Preston 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Thomas Preston, Mika Westerberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > > <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? > > Good to me, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch > per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] > umbrella as a database for such excerpts. > > Thomas, can you do that? > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ Sorry for not noticing earlier. Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on their own. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 14:42 ` Thomas Preston 2019-03-25 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Preston @ 2019-03-25 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko, Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Mika Westerberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List Hi, Thanks for looking at this. On 25/03/2019 13:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston >>> <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching >>>> ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. >>>> It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. >>> >>> Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? >> >> Good to me, >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >> >> Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch >> per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] >> umbrella as a database for such excerpts. >> >> Thomas, can you do that? >> >> [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi I will :) >> >>>> + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > > Sorry for not noticing earlier. > > Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on > their own. > > The device is a TI tmp75b temperature sensor [0]. The HID is completely made up, I'm afraid. It doesn't exist in the registry. [0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmp75b.pdf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 14:42 ` Thomas Preston @ 2019-03-25 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 15:04 ` Thomas Preston 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Preston Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Mika Westerberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:42:09PM +0000, Thomas Preston wrote: > On 25/03/2019 13:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch > > > per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] > > > umbrella as a database for such excerpts. > > > > > > Thomas, can you do that? > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > I will :) Thank you! I will take either GH PR, or you may send an email to maintainers, i.e. Mika and me (PR is preferable because it would be seen publicly) > > > > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > > > > Sorry for not noticing earlier. > > > > Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on > > their own. > The device is a TI tmp75b temperature sensor [0]. The HID is completely > made up, I'm afraid. It doesn't exist in the registry. Thanks for clarification. In that case I would rather recommend to use simple PRP0001 as a _HID. > [0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmp75b.pdf -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 2019-03-25 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-25 15:04 ` Thomas Preston 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Preston @ 2019-03-25 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Mika Westerberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 25/03/2019 15:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:42:09PM +0000, Thomas Preston wrote: >> On 25/03/2019 13:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>>> Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch >>>> per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] >>>> umbrella as a database for such excerpts. >>>> >>>> Thomas, can you do that? >>>> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi >> >> I will :) > > Thank you! I will take either GH PR, or you may send an email to maintainers, > i.e. Mika and me (PR is preferable because it would be seen publicly) > I will get around to this, later this week. >>>>>> + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ >>> >>> Sorry for not noticing earlier. >>> >>> Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on >>> their own. > >> The device is a TI tmp75b temperature sensor [0]. The HID is completely >> made up, I'm afraid. It doesn't exist in the registry. > > Thanks for clarification. In that case I would rather recommend to use simple > PRP0001 as a _HID. > Alright, I will resend with this modification. >> [0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmp75b.pdf > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-25 15:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-03-22 13:47 [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 Thomas Preston 2019-03-25 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2019-03-25 10:05 ` Mika Westerberg 2019-03-25 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 14:42 ` Thomas Preston 2019-03-25 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko 2019-03-25 15:04 ` Thomas Preston
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.