All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/13] btrfs: use btrfs_csum_data() instead of directly calling crc32c
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:18:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522081910.7689-2-jthumshirn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522081910.7689-1-jthumshirn@suse.de>

btrfsic_test_for_metadata() directly calls the crc32c() library function
for calculating the CRC32C checksum, but then uses btrfs_csum_final() to
invert the result.

To ease further refactoring and development around checksumming in BTRFS
convert to calling btrfs_csum_data(), which is a wrapper around crc32c().

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index b0c8094528d1..85774e2fa3e5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ static int btrfsic_test_for_metadata(struct btrfsic_state *state,
 		size_t sublen = i ? PAGE_SIZE :
 				    (PAGE_SIZE - BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE);
 
-		crc = crc32c(crc, data, sublen);
+		crc = btrfs_csum_data(data, crc, sublen);
 	}
 	btrfs_csum_final(crc, csum);
 	if (memcmp(csum, h->csum, state->csum_size))
-- 
2.16.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-22  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22  8:18 [PATCH v3 00/13] Add support for other checksums Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2019-05-22  8:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] btrfs: resurrect btrfs_crc32c() Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] btrfs: use btrfs_crc32c{,_final}() in for free space cache Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] btrfs: don't assume ordered sums to be 4 bytes Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] btrfs: dont assume compressed_bio " Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] btrfs: format checksums according to type for printing Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-27 16:57   ` David Sterba
2019-06-03  9:33     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] btrfs: add common checksum type validation Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-30 15:47   ` David Sterba
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] btrfs: check for supported superblock checksum type before checksum validation Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-30 15:49   ` David Sterba
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] btrfs: Simplify btrfs_check_super_csum() and get rid of size assumptions Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] btrfs: add boilerplate code for directly including the crypto framework Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] btrfs: directly call into crypto framework for checsumming Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:33   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-22  8:35     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  9:04     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-29 19:32   ` David Gstir
2019-05-30 10:14     ` David Sterba
2019-05-30 10:27       ` David Gstir
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] btrfs: remove assumption about csum type form btrfs_print_data_csum_error() Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-22  8:19 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] btrfs: add sha256 as another checksum algorithm Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-27 17:10   ` David Sterba
2019-05-27 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] Add support for other checksums David Sterba
2019-06-03  9:38   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-06-03 12:40     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190522081910.7689-2-jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=david@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.