All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:31:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820133106.GE29246@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190820081902.24815-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:18:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This is a similar idea to the fs_reclaim fake lockdep lock. It's
> fairly easy to provoke a specific notifier to be run on a specific
> range: Just prep it, and then munmap() it.
> 
> A bit harder, but still doable, is to provoke the mmu notifiers for
> all the various callchains that might lead to them. But both at the
> same time is really hard to reliable hit, especially when you want to
> exercise paths like direct reclaim or compaction, where it's not
> easy to control what exactly will be unmapped.
> 
> By introducing a lockdep map to tie them all together we allow lockdep
> to see a lot more dependencies, without having to actually hit them
> in a single challchain while testing.
> 
> On Jason's suggestion this is is rolled out for both
> invalidate_range_start and invalidate_range_end. They both have the
> same calling context, hence we can share the same lockdep map. Note
> that the annotation for invalidate_ranage_start is outside of the
> mm_has_notifiers(), to make sure lockdep is informed about all paths
> leading to this context irrespective of whether mmu notifiers are
> present for a given context. We don't do that on the
> invalidate_range_end side to avoid paying the overhead twice, there
> the lockdep annotation is pushed down behind the mm_has_notifiers()
> check.
> 
> v2: Use lock_map_acquire/release() like fs_reclaim, to avoid confusion
> with this being a real mutex (Chris Wilson).
> 
> v3: Rebase on top of Glisse's arg rework.
> 
> v4: Also annotate invalidate_range_end (Jason Gunthorpe)
> Also annotate invalidate_range_start_nonblock, I somehow missed that
> one in the first version.
> 
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 8 ++++++++
>  mm/mmu_notifier.c            | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20  8:18 [PATCH 0/4] mmu notifier debug annotations/checks Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20  8:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 13:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-20  8:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, notifier: Prime lockdep Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 13:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-20  8:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end() Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20  8:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 20:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 20:24     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-22 23:14     ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-22 23:14       ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-23  8:34       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23  8:34         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23 12:12         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:12           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-23 12:22             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-23 13:42           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23 13:42             ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23 14:06             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-23 14:06               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-23 15:15               ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23 15:15                 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-23  8:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-23  8:48       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-20  8:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 13:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-20 15:18     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 15:27       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-21  9:34         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-21  9:34           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-21 15:41       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-21 15:41         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-21 16:16         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-22  8:42           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-22  8:42             ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-22 14:24             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-22 14:27               ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-22 14:27                 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-20 11:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for mmu notifier debug annotations/checks Patchwork
2019-08-20 12:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-08-20 18:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190820133106.GE29246@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.