All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: do not select same victim right again
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:06:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190909080654.GD21625@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69933b7f-48cc-47f9-ba6f-b5ca8f733cba@huawei.com>

On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/9/9 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > GC must avoid select the same victim again.
> 
> Blocks in previous victim will occupy addition free segment, I doubt after this
> change, FGGC may encounter out-of-free space issue more frequently.

Hmm, actually this change seems wrong by sec_usage_check().
We may be able to avoid this only in the suspicious loop?

---
 fs/f2fs/gc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index e88f98ddf396..5877bd729689 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync,
 		round++;
 	}
 
-	if (gc_type == FG_GC)
+	if (gc_type == FG_GC && seg_freed)
 		sbi->cur_victim_sec = NULL_SEGNO;
 
 	if (sync)
-- 
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: do not select same victim right again
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:06:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190909080654.GD21625@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69933b7f-48cc-47f9-ba6f-b5ca8f733cba@huawei.com>

On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/9/9 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > GC must avoid select the same victim again.
> 
> Blocks in previous victim will occupy addition free segment, I doubt after this
> change, FGGC may encounter out-of-free space issue more frequently.

Hmm, actually this change seems wrong by sec_usage_check().
We may be able to avoid this only in the suspicious loop?

---
 fs/f2fs/gc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index e88f98ddf396..5877bd729689 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync,
 		round++;
 	}
 
-	if (gc_type == FG_GC)
+	if (gc_type == FG_GC && seg_freed)
 		sbi->cur_victim_sec = NULL_SEGNO;
 
 	if (sync)
-- 
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-09  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09  1:25 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: do not select same victim right again Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  1:25 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  1:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid infinite GC loop due to stale atomic files Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  1:25   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  3:03   ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  3:03     ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  7:30     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  7:30       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  7:54       ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  7:54         ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:01         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:01           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:05           ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:05             ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:21             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:21               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:27               ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:27                 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:38                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:38                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:44                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09  8:44                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09 11:26                   ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09 11:26                     ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09 14:34                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09 14:34                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-10  0:59                       ` Chao Yu
2019-09-10  0:59                         ` Chao Yu
2019-09-10 11:58                         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-10 11:58                           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-10 12:04                           ` Chao Yu
2019-09-10 12:04                             ` Chao Yu
2019-09-10 12:09                             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-10 12:09                               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-16  1:15                               ` Chao Yu
2019-09-16  1:15                                 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  2:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: do not select same victim right again Chao Yu
2019-09-09  2:56   ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09  8:06   ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2019-09-09  8:06     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09 11:32     ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09 11:32       ` Chao Yu
2019-09-09 12:04       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-09 12:04         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-16  1:22         ` Chao Yu
2019-09-16  1:22           ` Chao Yu
2019-09-16 15:37           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-16 15:37             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-17  1:42             ` Chao Yu
2019-09-17  1:42               ` Chao Yu
2019-09-17 20:55               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-17 20:55                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-18  1:43                 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-18  1:43                   ` Chao Yu
2019-09-18  3:12                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-18  3:12                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-18  3:26                     ` Chao Yu
2019-09-18  3:26                       ` Chao Yu
2019-09-18 16:47                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-18 16:47                         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-19  0:53                         ` Chao Yu
2019-09-19  0:53                           ` Chao Yu
2019-09-19 17:11                           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-19 17:11                             ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190909080654.GD21625@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.