All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:29:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190912002929.78873-1-yuzhao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911071331.770ecddff6a085330bf2b5f2@linux-foundation.org>

Mask of slub objects per page shouldn't be larger than what
page->objects can hold.

It requires more than 2^15 objects to hit the problem, and I don't
think anybody would. It'd be nice to have the mask fixed, but not
really worth cc'ing the stable.

Fixes: 50d5c41cd151 ("slub: Do not use frozen page flag but a bit in the page counters")
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
 mm/slub.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 8834563cdb4b..62053ceb4464 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static inline bool kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s)
  */
 #define DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
-#define OO_SHIFT	16
+#define OO_SHIFT	15
 #define OO_MASK		((1 << OO_SHIFT) - 1)
 #define MAX_OBJS_PER_PAGE	32767 /* since page.objects is u15 */
 
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ static inline unsigned int oo_order(struct kmem_cache_order_objects x)
 
 static inline unsigned int oo_objects(struct kmem_cache_order_objects x)
 {
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(OO_MASK > MAX_OBJS_PER_PAGE);
+
 	return x.x & OO_MASK;
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0.162.g0b9fbb3734-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-12  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09  6:10 [PATCH] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-09  6:10 ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-09 16:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-09 20:57   ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-09 21:39     ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-10  1:41       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-10  2:16         ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-10  9:16       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-11 14:13 ` Andrew Morton
2019-09-12  0:29   ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2019-09-12  0:29     ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29     ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29       ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:44       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  1:31         ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31         ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31           ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: clean up validate_slab() Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  9:46             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 10:04             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: lock slub page when listing objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 10:06             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 21:12               ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-13 14:58             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-13 14:58               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-12  9:40           ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 21:11             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 22:03               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-14  0:07           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: clean up validate_slab() Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07             ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07               ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-16  8:39             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: clean up validate_slab() Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-11-08 19:39             ` [PATCH v4 " Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39               ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39               ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39                 ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-09 20:52                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 20:52                   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 23:01                   ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-09 23:16                     ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 23:16                       ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-10 18:47                       ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-11 15:47                         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 15:47                           ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 15:55                           ` [FIX] slub: Remove kmalloc under list_lock from list_slab_objects() V2 Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 15:55                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-30 23:09                             ` Andrew Morton
2019-12-01  1:17                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-12-02 15:12                               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-12-02 15:12                                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-12-07 22:03                                 ` Yu Zhao
2020-01-10 14:11                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-12 11:03                                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-01-13  1:34                                       ` Christopher Lameter
2020-01-13  1:34                                         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 18:15                           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Shakeel Butt
2019-11-11 18:15                             ` Shakeel Butt
2019-09-12  0:29     ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: lock slub page when listing objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29       ` Yu Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190912002929.78873-1-yuzhao@google.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.