All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:47:03 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911111543420.10669@www.lameter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191110184721.GA171640@google.com>

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019, Yu Zhao wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:16:28PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, Yu Zhao wrote:
> >
> > > >  	struct page *page, *h;
> > > > +	unsigned long *map = bitmap_alloc(oo_objects(s->max), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!map)
> > > > +		return;
> > >
> > > What would happen if we are trying to allocate from the slab that is
> > > being shut down? And shouldn't the allocation be conditional (i.e.,
> > > only when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y)?
> >
> > Kmalloc slabs are never shut down.
>
> Maybe I'm not thinking straight -- isn't it what caused the deadlock in
> the first place?

Well if kmalloc allocations become a problem then we have numerous
issues all over the kernel to fix.

> Kmalloc slabs can be shut down when memcg is on.

Kmalloc needs to work even during shutdown of a memcg.

Maybe we need to fix memcg to not allocate from the current memcg during
shutdown?



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09  6:10 [PATCH] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-09  6:10 ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-09 16:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-09 20:57   ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-09 21:39     ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-10  1:41       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-10  2:16         ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-10  9:16       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-11 14:13 ` Andrew Morton
2019-09-12  0:29   ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29     ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29     ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29       ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:44       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  1:31         ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31         ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31           ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: clean up validate_slab() Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  9:46             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 10:04             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12  2:31           ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: lock slub page when listing objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  2:31             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 10:06             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 21:12               ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-13 14:58             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-13 14:58               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-12  9:40           ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 21:11             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-12 22:03               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-14  0:07           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: clean up validate_slab() Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07             ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07             ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-09-14  0:07               ` Yu Zhao
2019-09-16  8:39             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: clean up validate_slab() Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-11-08 19:39             ` [PATCH v4 " Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39               ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39               ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Yu Zhao
2019-11-08 19:39                 ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-09 20:52                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 20:52                   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 23:01                   ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-09 23:16                     ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-09 23:16                       ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-10 18:47                       ` Yu Zhao
2019-11-11 15:47                         ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2019-11-11 15:47                           ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 15:55                           ` [FIX] slub: Remove kmalloc under list_lock from list_slab_objects() V2 Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 15:55                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-30 23:09                             ` Andrew Morton
2019-12-01  1:17                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-12-02 15:12                               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-12-02 15:12                                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-12-07 22:03                                 ` Yu Zhao
2020-01-10 14:11                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-12 11:03                                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-01-13  1:34                                       ` Christopher Lameter
2020-01-13  1:34                                         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-11 18:15                           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock Shakeel Butt
2019-11-11 18:15                             ` Shakeel Butt
2019-09-12  0:29     ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: lock slub page when listing objects Yu Zhao
2019-09-12  0:29       ` Yu Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1911111543420.10669@www.lameter.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.