[U-Boot] [PATCH] pinctrl: Kconfig: remove duplicated nodes

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pinctrl: Kconfig: remove duplicated nodes

[Patrick Delaunay]

Remove the duplicated configs introduced when the same patch is
applied twice times:
- commit e878b53a79d1 ("dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE
  option")
- commit c20851b3d850 ("dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE
  option")


Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
---

 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 6b41f66a86..deee92411c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -75,22 +75,6 @@ config PINCONF_RECURSIVE
 	  configuration; you can save memory footprint when this feature is
 	  no needed.
 
-config PINCONF_RECURSIVE
-	bool "Support recursive binding for pin configuration nodes"
-	depends on PINCTRL_FULL
-	default n if ARCH_STM32MP
-	default y
-	help
-	  In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes need not be
-	  direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for
-	  example). It is define is each individual pin controller device.
-	  Say Y here if you want to keep this behavior with the pinconfig
-	  u-class: all sub are recursivelly bounded.
-	  If the option is disabled, this behavior is deactivated and only
-	  the direct children of pin controller will be assumed as pin
-	  configuration; you can save memory footprint when this feature is
-	  no needed.
-
 config SPL_PINCTRL
 	bool "Support pin controllers in SPL"
 	depends on SPL && SPL_DM
@@ -145,15 +129,6 @@ config SPL_PINCONF_RECURSIVE
 	  This option is an SPL-variant of the PINCONF_RECURSIVE option.
 	  See the help of PINCONF_RECURSIVE for details.
 
-config SPL_PINCONF_RECURSIVE
-	bool "Support recursive binding for pin configuration nodes in SPL"
-	depends on SPL_PINCTRL_FULL
-	default n if ARCH_STM32MP
-	default y
-	help
-	  This option is an SPL-variant of the PINCONF_RECURSIVE option.
-	  See the help of PINCONF_RECURSIVE for details.
-
 if PINCTRL || SPL_PINCTRL
 
 config PINCTRL_AR933X
-- 
2.17.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pinctrl: Kconfig: remove duplicated nodes

[Anatolij Gustschin]

Hi Patrick,

On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:07:54 +0200
Patrick Delaunay patrick.delaunay at st.com wrote:

> Remove the duplicated configs introduced when the same patch is
> applied twice times:

There is already a patch pending http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1179889

--
Anatolij

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pinctrl: Kconfig: remove duplicated nodes

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:07:54PM +0200, Patrick Delaunay wrote:

> Remove the duplicated configs introduced when the same patch is
> applied twice times:
> - commit e878b53a79d1 ("dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE
>   option")
> - commit c20851b3d850 ("dm: pinctrl: introduce PINCONF_RECURSIVE
>   option")
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20191021/cb3ae99d/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pinctrl: Kconfig: remove duplicated nodes

[Patrick DELAUNAY]

Hi Anatolij,

> From: Uboot-stm32 <uboot-stm32-bounces@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com> On
> Behalf Of Anatolij Gustschin
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:07:54 +0200
> Patrick Delaunay patrick.delaunay at st.com wrote:
> 
> > Remove the duplicated configs introduced when the same patch is
> > applied twice times:
> 
> There is already a patch pending http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1179889

Yes, I see your just after that I sent my correction.

Thanks and sorry for the duplicate patch.

> --
> Anatolij

Regards

Patrick