All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kprobes: Drop open-coded exception fixup
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:49:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021174926.10992282af1c36d721a6747d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e70f7b9de7e601b9e4a6fedad8eaf64d304b1637.1571326276.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

Hi Robin,

On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:31:42 +0100
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:

> The short-circuit call to fixup_exception() from kprobe_fault_handler()
> poses a problem now that the former wants to consume the fault address
> too, since the common kprobes API offers us no way to pass it through.
> Fortunately, however, it works out to be unnecessary:

Thank you for pointing it out!

> 
> - uaccess instructions themselves are not probeable, so at most we
>   should only ever expect to take a fixable fault from the pre or post
>   handlers.

Right. If it is not fixable, we should handle it as a kernel bug.
(to avoid it we can use probe_kernel_read() in kprobe handler)

> - the pre and post handler run with preemption disabled, thus for any
>   fault they may cause, an unhandled return from kprobe_page_fault()
>   will proceed directly to __do_kernel_fault() thanks to the
>   faulthandler_disabled() check.

OK, this is reasonable.

> - __do_kernel_fault() will immediately call fixup_exception() unless
>   we're in an EL1 instruction abort, and if we've somehow taken one of
>   those on what we think is the middle of a uaccess routine, then the
>   world is already very on fire.

OK, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thank you!

> 
> Thus we can reasonably drop the call from kprobe_fault_handler() and
> leave uaccess fixups to the regular flow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index c4452827419b..422fbd5c6c55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -334,13 +334,6 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
>  		 */
>  		if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
>  			return 1;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
> -		 * zero, try to fix up.
> -		 */
> -		if (fixup_exception(regs))
> -			return 1;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.21.0.dirty
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kprobes: Drop open-coded exception fixup
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:49:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021174926.10992282af1c36d721a6747d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e70f7b9de7e601b9e4a6fedad8eaf64d304b1637.1571326276.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

Hi Robin,

On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:31:42 +0100
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:

> The short-circuit call to fixup_exception() from kprobe_fault_handler()
> poses a problem now that the former wants to consume the fault address
> too, since the common kprobes API offers us no way to pass it through.
> Fortunately, however, it works out to be unnecessary:

Thank you for pointing it out!

> 
> - uaccess instructions themselves are not probeable, so at most we
>   should only ever expect to take a fixable fault from the pre or post
>   handlers.

Right. If it is not fixable, we should handle it as a kernel bug.
(to avoid it we can use probe_kernel_read() in kprobe handler)

> - the pre and post handler run with preemption disabled, thus for any
>   fault they may cause, an unhandled return from kprobe_page_fault()
>   will proceed directly to __do_kernel_fault() thanks to the
>   faulthandler_disabled() check.

OK, this is reasonable.

> - __do_kernel_fault() will immediately call fixup_exception() unless
>   we're in an EL1 instruction abort, and if we've somehow taken one of
>   those on what we think is the middle of a uaccess routine, then the
>   world is already very on fire.

OK, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thank you!

> 
> Thus we can reasonably drop the call from kprobe_fault_handler() and
> leave uaccess fixups to the regular flow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index c4452827419b..422fbd5c6c55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -334,13 +334,6 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
>  		 */
>  		if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
>  			return 1;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
> -		 * zero, try to fix up.
> -		 */
> -		if (fixup_exception(regs))
> -			return 1;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.21.0.dirty
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17 15:31 [PATCH] arm64: kprobes: Drop open-coded exception fixup Robin Murphy
2019-10-17 15:31 ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-21  8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2019-10-21  8:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021174926.10992282af1c36d721a6747d@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.