All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] input: adp5589: Make keypad support optional
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:50:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910250833.IlbJgJPZ%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023070541.13940-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3541 bytes --]

Hi Alexandru,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on input/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.4-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20191024]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexandru-Ardelean/input-adp5589-Make-keypad-support-optional/20191025-034654
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git next
config: x86_64-kexec (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:575:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
     struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
            ^~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:581:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
     struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
            ^~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1049:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_add'; did you mean 'adp5589_keypad_add'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     error = adp5589_gpio_add(kpad, pdata);
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
             adp5589_keypad_add
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_remove':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1074:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_remove'; did you mean 'adp5589_remove'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     adp5589_gpio_remove(kpad, pdata);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     adp5589_remove
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1019:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      kpad->support_row5 = true;
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1020:2: note: here
     case ADP5585_01:
     ^~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +575 drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c

   552	
   553	static void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
   554		const struct adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   555	{
   556		struct device *dev = &kpad->client->dev;
   557		const struct adp5589_gpio_platform_data *gpio_data = pdata->gpio_data;
   558		int error;
   559	
   560		if (!kpad->export_gpio)
   561			return;
   562	
   563		if (gpio_data->teardown) {
   564			error = gpio_data->teardown(kpad->client,
   565						    kpad->gc.base, kpad->gc.ngpio,
   566						    gpio_data->context);
   567			if (error)
   568				dev_warn(dev, "teardown failed %d\n", error);
   569		}
   570	
   571		gpiochip_remove(&kpad->gc);
   572	}
   573	#else
   574	static inline int adp5589_gpio_add(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
 > 575		struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   576	{
   577		return 0;
   578	}
   579	
   580	static inline void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
 > 581		struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   582	{
   583	}
   584	#endif
   585	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 27445 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] input: adp5589: Make keypad support optional
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:50:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910250833.IlbJgJPZ%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023070541.13940-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3630 bytes --]

Hi Alexandru,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on input/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.4-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20191024]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexandru-Ardelean/input-adp5589-Make-keypad-support-optional/20191025-034654
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git next
config: x86_64-kexec (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:575:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
     struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
            ^~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:581:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
     struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
            ^~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1049:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_add'; did you mean 'adp5589_keypad_add'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     error = adp5589_gpio_add(kpad, pdata);
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
             adp5589_keypad_add
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_remove':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1074:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_remove'; did you mean 'adp5589_remove'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     adp5589_gpio_remove(kpad, pdata);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     adp5589_remove
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1019:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
      kpad->support_row5 = true;
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1020:2: note: here
     case ADP5585_01:
     ^~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +575 drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c

   552	
   553	static void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
   554		const struct adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   555	{
   556		struct device *dev = &kpad->client->dev;
   557		const struct adp5589_gpio_platform_data *gpio_data = pdata->gpio_data;
   558		int error;
   559	
   560		if (!kpad->export_gpio)
   561			return;
   562	
   563		if (gpio_data->teardown) {
   564			error = gpio_data->teardown(kpad->client,
   565						    kpad->gc.base, kpad->gc.ngpio,
   566						    gpio_data->context);
   567			if (error)
   568				dev_warn(dev, "teardown failed %d\n", error);
   569		}
   570	
   571		gpiochip_remove(&kpad->gc);
   572	}
   573	#else
   574	static inline int adp5589_gpio_add(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
 > 575		struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   576	{
   577		return 0;
   578	}
   579	
   580	static inline void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
 > 581		struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
   582	{
   583	}
   584	#endif
   585	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 27445 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190717122133.24333-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
2019-09-27 12:38 ` [PATCH][RESEND] input: adp5589: Make keypad support optional Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-27 12:38   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-10-23  7:05   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-10-23 22:59     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-24  9:24       ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-10-24 20:30     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-24 20:30       ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-25  0:50     ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-10-25  0:50       ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201910250833.IlbJgJPZ%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.