From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/gem: Honour O_NONBLOCK before throttling execbuf submissions Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:05:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191115160546.896305-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191115160546.896305-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Check the user's flags on the struct file before deciding whether or not to stall before submitting a request. This allows us to reasonably cheaply honour O_NONBLOCK without checking at more critical phases during request submission. Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 21 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index f0998f1225af..8da95772c8f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -2249,15 +2249,22 @@ static int __eb_pin_engine(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, struct intel_context *ce) intel_context_timeline_unlock(tl); if (rq) { - if (i915_request_wait(rq, - I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE, - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0) { - i915_request_put(rq); - err = -EINTR; - goto err_exit; - } + bool nonblock = eb->file->filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK; + long timeout; + + timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT; + if (nonblock) + timeout = 0; + timeout = i915_request_wait(rq, + I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE, + timeout); i915_request_put(rq); + + if (timeout < 0) { + err = nonblock ? -EWOULDBLOCK : timeout; + goto err_exit; + } } eb->engine = ce->engine; -- 2.24.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/gem: Honour O_NONBLOCK before throttling execbuf submissions Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:05:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191115160546.896305-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw) Message-ID: <20191115160546.0qTPpijYhqR076oJlxQ42RZjq90Zar7qa2R7YB0YaGw@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191115160546.896305-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Check the user's flags on the struct file before deciding whether or not to stall before submitting a request. This allows us to reasonably cheaply honour O_NONBLOCK without checking at more critical phases during request submission. Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 21 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index f0998f1225af..8da95772c8f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -2249,15 +2249,22 @@ static int __eb_pin_engine(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, struct intel_context *ce) intel_context_timeline_unlock(tl); if (rq) { - if (i915_request_wait(rq, - I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE, - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0) { - i915_request_put(rq); - err = -EINTR; - goto err_exit; - } + bool nonblock = eb->file->filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK; + long timeout; + + timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT; + if (nonblock) + timeout = 0; + timeout = i915_request_wait(rq, + I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE, + timeout); i915_request_put(rq); + + if (timeout < 0) { + err = nonblock ? -EWOULDBLOCK : timeout; + goto err_exit; + } } eb->engine = ce->engine; -- 2.24.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 16:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-11-15 16:05 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting Chris Wilson 2019-11-15 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson 2019-11-15 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Allow userspace to specify ringsize on construction Chris Wilson 2019-11-15 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson 2019-11-18 11:14 ` Janusz Krzysztofik 2019-11-18 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Janusz Krzysztofik 2019-11-18 11:28 ` Chris Wilson 2019-11-18 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson 2019-11-25 10:05 ` Chris Wilson 2019-11-25 10:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson 2019-11-15 16:05 ` Chris Wilson [this message] 2019-11-15 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/gem: Honour O_NONBLOCK before throttling execbuf submissions Chris Wilson 2019-11-15 20:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting Patchwork 2019-11-15 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork 2019-11-17 9:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2019-11-17 9:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork 2019-11-25 12:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting (rev2) Patchwork 2019-11-25 12:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191115160546.896305-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.