All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	dnbanerg@us.ibm.com, brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:23:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125112359.7a468352@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52660c98-efd6-16e7-e66d-3528e5b32d3d@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:40:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> On 11/23/19 7:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:  
> >> This patch series fixes some shortcomings with the current
> >> VNIC device command implementation. The first patch fixes
> >> the initialization of driver completion structures used
> >> for device commands. Additionally, all waits for device
> >> commands are bounded with a timeout in the event that the
> >> device does not respond or becomes inoperable. Finally,
> >> serialize queries to retain the integrity of device return
> >> codes.  
> > I have minor comments on two patches, but also I think it's
> > a little late in the release cycle for putting this in net.
> >
> > Could you target net-next and repost ASAP so it still makes
> > it into 5.5?
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the late response.  I will make the requested 
> changes ASAP, but I've missed the net-next window.  What should I target 
> for v2?

You're right, sticking to "net" makes sense at this point.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dnbanerg@us.ibm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:23:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125112359.7a468352@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52660c98-efd6-16e7-e66d-3528e5b32d3d@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:40:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> On 11/23/19 7:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:  
> >> This patch series fixes some shortcomings with the current
> >> VNIC device command implementation. The first patch fixes
> >> the initialization of driver completion structures used
> >> for device commands. Additionally, all waits for device
> >> commands are bounded with a timeout in the event that the
> >> device does not respond or becomes inoperable. Finally,
> >> serialize queries to retain the integrity of device return
> >> codes.  
> > I have minor comments on two patches, but also I think it's
> > a little late in the release cycle for putting this in net.
> >
> > Could you target net-next and repost ASAP so it still makes
> > it into 5.5?
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the late response.  I will make the requested 
> changes ASAP, but I've missed the net-next window.  What should I target 
> for v2?

You're right, sticking to "net" makes sense at this point.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-25 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-22 19:41 [PATCH net 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41 ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41 ` [PATCH net 1/4] ibmvnic: Fix completion structure initialization Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41   ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41 ` [PATCH net 2/4] ibmvnic: Terminate waiting device threads after loss of service Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41   ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41 ` [PATCH net 3/4] ibmvnic: Bound waits for device queries Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41   ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-24  1:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-24  1:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-22 19:41 ` [PATCH net 4/4] ibmvnic: Serialize " Thomas Falcon
2019-11-22 19:41   ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-24  1:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-24  1:47     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-24  1:49 ` [PATCH net 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-24  1:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-25 18:40   ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 18:40     ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 19:23     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-11-25 19:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-11-25 23:12       ` [PATCH net v2 " Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12         ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12         ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] ibmvnic: Fix completion structure initialization Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12           ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12         ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] ibmvnic: Terminate waiting device threads after loss of service Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12           ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12         ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] ibmvnic: Bound waits for device queries Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12           ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12         ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] ibmvnic: Serialize " Thomas Falcon
2019-11-25 23:12           ` Thomas Falcon
2019-11-26 21:19         ` [PATCH net v2 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries David Miller
2019-11-26 21:19           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191125112359.7a468352@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dnbanerg@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.