From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.de>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, will.deacon@arm.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for arm64 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:47:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191210144737.GB3975980@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <11195456.EmMzWPVPDU@skinner.arch.suse.de> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:33:07PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Monday, December 9, 2019 6:38:05 PM CET Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > On Monday, December 9, 2019 11:31:11 AM CET Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 05:24:21PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > > > From: Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.de> > > > > > > > > > > Export all information from /proc/cpuinfo to sysfs: > > > > > implementer, architecture, variant, part, revision, > > > > > bogomips and flags are exported. > > > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/info/:[0]# head * > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > ==> flags <== > > > > > fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid asimdrdm > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > I don't understand why we need this on arm64 > > Again: proc is moving to sys. No. New stuff is to be added to /sys/, don't add new things to /proc unless it deals with processes. There is no mass-migration of existing /proc files to sysfs for no good reason. > You probably export feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo for a good reason. > So where in sysfs should this show up? Why does it have to live in sysfs if it is already in /proc and parsed properly by tools? thanks, greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.de>, Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.com>, x86@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for arm64 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:47:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191210144737.GB3975980@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <11195456.EmMzWPVPDU@skinner.arch.suse.de> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:33:07PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Monday, December 9, 2019 6:38:05 PM CET Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > On Monday, December 9, 2019 11:31:11 AM CET Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 05:24:21PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > > > From: Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.de> > > > > > > > > > > Export all information from /proc/cpuinfo to sysfs: > > > > > implementer, architecture, variant, part, revision, > > > > > bogomips and flags are exported. > > > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/info/:[0]# head * > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > ==> flags <== > > > > > fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid asimdrdm > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > I don't understand why we need this on arm64 > > Again: proc is moving to sys. No. New stuff is to be added to /sys/, don't add new things to /proc unless it deals with processes. There is no mass-migration of existing /proc files to sysfs for no good reason. > You probably export feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo for a good reason. > So where in sysfs should this show up? Why does it have to live in sysfs if it is already in /proc and parsed properly by tools? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 14:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-12-06 16:24 [PATCH v5 0/3] sysfs: add sysfs based cpuinfo Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpuinfo: add sysfs based arch independent cpuinfo framework Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:33 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:33 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:33 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap 2019-12-06 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap 2019-12-06 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap 2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for x86 Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:36 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:36 ` Greg KH 2019-12-10 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner 2019-12-10 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner 2019-12-10 20:53 ` Greg KH 2019-12-10 20:53 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 10:42 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 10:42 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 13:56 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 13:56 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 14:12 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 14:12 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 14:26 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 14:26 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 14:52 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 14:52 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-11 14:57 ` Greg KH 2019-12-11 14:57 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for arm64 Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:37 ` Greg KH 2019-12-06 16:37 ` Greg KH 2019-12-09 10:31 ` Will Deacon 2019-12-09 10:31 ` Will Deacon 2019-12-09 11:28 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-09 11:28 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-09 17:38 ` Will Deacon 2019-12-09 17:38 ` Will Deacon 2019-12-10 13:33 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-10 13:33 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-10 14:47 ` Greg KH [this message] 2019-12-10 14:47 ` Greg KH 2019-12-10 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-10 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] sysfs: add sysfs based cpuinfo Mark Rutland 2019-12-06 16:58 ` Mark Rutland 2019-12-06 17:29 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 17:29 ` Thomas Renninger 2019-12-06 18:16 ` Mark Rutland 2019-12-06 18:16 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191210144737.GB3975980@kroah.com \ --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=fschnizlein@suse.com \ --cc=fschnizlein@suse.de \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=trenn@suse.de \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.