All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Cc: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.de,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add current maximum eDP link rate to sink_rate array.
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:47:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109164715.GD13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEsyxyj6xbHrkKk5=bG5APrD5VW_PP-Cs+nT0vqCjW_LBSG29A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:30:05PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:38 PM Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:26:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:07:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > > > The panel reports 10 bpc color depth in its EDID, and the UEFI
> > > > firmware chooses link settings at boot which support enough
> > > > bandwidth for 10 bpc (324000 kbit/sec to be precise), but the
> > > > DP_MAX_LINK_RATE dpcd register only reports 2.7 Gbps as possible,
> >
> > Does it actually or do we just ignore the fact that it reports 3.24Gbps?
> >
> > If it really reports 3.24 then we should be able to just add that to
> > dp_rates[] in intel_dp_set_sink_rates() and be done with it.
> >
> > Although we'd likely want to skip 3.24 unless it really is reported
> > as the max so as to not use that non-standard rate on other displays.
> > So would require a bit fancier logic for that.
> >
> >
> Was also my initial thought, but the DP_MAX_LINK_RATE reg reports 2.7 Gbps
> as maximum.

So dpcd[0x1] == 0xa ?

What about the magic second version of DP_MAX_LINK_RATE at 0x2201 ?
Hmm. I guess we should already be reading that via
intel_dp_extended_receiver_capabilities().

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Cc: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.de,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add current maximum eDP link rate to sink_rate array.
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:47:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109164715.GD13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEsyxyj6xbHrkKk5=bG5APrD5VW_PP-Cs+nT0vqCjW_LBSG29A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:30:05PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:38 PM Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:26:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:07:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > > > The panel reports 10 bpc color depth in its EDID, and the UEFI
> > > > firmware chooses link settings at boot which support enough
> > > > bandwidth for 10 bpc (324000 kbit/sec to be precise), but the
> > > > DP_MAX_LINK_RATE dpcd register only reports 2.7 Gbps as possible,
> >
> > Does it actually or do we just ignore the fact that it reports 3.24Gbps?
> >
> > If it really reports 3.24 then we should be able to just add that to
> > dp_rates[] in intel_dp_set_sink_rates() and be done with it.
> >
> > Although we'd likely want to skip 3.24 unless it really is reported
> > as the max so as to not use that non-standard rate on other displays.
> > So would require a bit fancier logic for that.
> >
> >
> Was also my initial thought, but the DP_MAX_LINK_RATE reg reports 2.7 Gbps
> as maximum.

So dpcd[0x1] == 0xa ?

What about the magic second version of DP_MAX_LINK_RATE at 0x2201 ?
Hmm. I guess we should already be reading that via
intel_dp_extended_receiver_capabilities().

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-09 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 15:07 Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 15:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 15:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 15:38   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 15:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 16:30     ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 16:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 16:47       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-01-09 16:47         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 17:57         ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 17:57           ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 18:24           ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 18:24             ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 20:19             ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 20:19               ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-10 13:32               ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-10 13:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-10 15:50                 ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-10 15:50                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 16:31     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 16:31       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 16:27   ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 16:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 15:39 ` Alex Deucher
2020-01-09 15:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2020-01-09 16:46   ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 16:46     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 19:49     ` Alex Deucher
2020-01-09 19:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2020-01-09 21:04       ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 21:04         ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-09 21:26         ` Harry Wentland
2020-01-09 21:26           ` [Intel-gfx] " Harry Wentland
2020-01-10 16:02           ` Mario Kleiner
2020-01-10 16:02             ` [Intel-gfx] " Mario Kleiner
2020-01-10 18:09           ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-10 18:09             ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-15 12:34             ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-15 12:34               ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-15 14:17               ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-15 14:17                 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 23:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/dp: Add current maximum eDP link rate to sink_rate array. (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200109164715.GD13686@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
    --cc=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add current maximum eDP link rate to sink_rate array.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.